Tom's Guide | Tom's Hardware | Tom's Games
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Name: MikeG
I just got broadband (cable) for my iMac G3 350 MHz. The
advertised speed of the service is 3000k download.
Whenever I run internet speed tests on my WIndows XP
laptop, I get around 3096k, but whenever I run a speed
test on my Mac, I get around 800k-1300k (much slower
than the PC). The computers are all connected via a
Linksys WRT54G (with the latest firmware). I know the
router is not the problem, because the Windows laptop
gets the full speeds perfectly. Why is this happening? Is it
a simple setting that I overlooked? Thanks for any help!!-MikeG

Wow... very interesting... BTW, it seems that I can
get a bit more speed on my Internet Explorer
(Mac) than on safari... I would much rather use
Safari, any other suggestions?-MikeG

That's not a hard and fast rule..my G3 450 MH is almost twice as fast..real world..i routinely get (350 KB/S +) 300 meg downloads done in well under 15 minutes whereas the PCon the sme download can end up never going over 250 KB/S ..it rarely downloads over 350 KB/S whereas this is a more common occurence with the mac..as they both have the older 10/100 cards in them i expect there's just a lot of variables that can make any generalizations difficult..the net cards play a large part, as well as any potential bottlenecks.
I would expect, in fact, any newer mac to be faster than a factory assembled PC..due to the integration of the circuit board and hardware in the newer macs..this kind of integrated design is really beeficial for PC's too, i have a Compaq 486 66MH all-in -one that, despite a slower net card, andharddrive, etc, is much faster in every real world way , including net access, than this 'assembled' pentium100 mmx (an older MDG).
It was in fact true about the first powermacs, that their broadband access were very much slower than a comparable P.C. also using broadband..again, due to a motherboard design flaw...
The 350 MHZ iMacs, if i'm not mistaken, have only a 10mbps card anyways, so for it to be even close in performance to a 10/100 NIC speaks wads about design...

![]() |
![]() |
![]() |

This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.
| Ads by Google |