Computing.Net > Forums > Linux > Windows (server) with Linux viaCAT5

Computer Problems? Computing.Net has over 1,000,000 posts about all things technology related! Over 90% answered within 24 hours! Click here to start participating now! Also, be sure to check out the New User Guide.

Windows (server) with Linux viaCAT5

Reply to Message Icon

Name: JustinCS
Date: February 20, 2005 at 23:39:26 Pacific
OS: XP
CPU/Ram: 512ddr
Comment:

Howdy, I'm interested in running linux, but not to interested in burning all the latest isos to try finding the right one. I have two computers and one being a laptop I've had not much problems getting it networked to share internet with a program called CCproxy. I can't dump my Windows on main computer because my cable company only supports windows for hardware installation but I'm allowed to (**with their permission**) to share a connection with another computer. I'd like to change to a linux secondary computer.


I'm interested in one that is easy to get XP to see and network with a cat5 crossover cable (NIC to NIC), no router, no hub!!! (router/hub not allowed by the way on my ISP)and I'm interested in it being a secure version and interact friendly with my Windows computer! Any ideas on what is quick, easy, reliable, and secure would be greatly interested in knowing about.


Not that important but I'd love to run linux!
Thankyou



Sponsored Link
Ads by Google

Response Number 1
Name: iamc
Date: February 21, 2005 at 17:24:00 Pacific
Reply:

Pretty much all modern Linux distributions can do what you're asking. Any of them will be able to "share a connection" with your Windows computer with little or no configuration necessary.

Alternatively, just spend 40 bucks on a router. Simpler to setup and maintain than any proxy software on your Windows box, and it frees all your computers from being dependent on the one Windows box for their Internet connection.

To get started on the Linux side of things, I would recommend a "live CD" distribution, such as knoppix. It will allow you to run a full, graphical Linux environment without installing or configuring anything. Once you're comfortable with that, I'd recommend SuSE Linux


0

Response Number 2
Name: JustinCS
Date: February 21, 2005 at 21:30:31 Pacific
Reply:

Problem with router is my ISP will not allow it. It requires an additional IP address which I DO NOT want to pay for. Ethernet = free, and my isp gave me their email blessing with it without reprecussions, so I want to do a direct connect.

I've used Knoppix, Mandrake, and Redhat before. I just want to know if any ISOs are especially geared towards a network via ethernet. It is specifically necessary to be ethernet though.


0

Response Number 3
Name: FishMonger
Date: February 21, 2005 at 23:58:07 Pacific
Reply:

The router doesn't require an additional IP address. You connect the modem to the router's WAN port instead of to your computer and the your computers are then connected to the router's LAN ports. The router will use NAT (Network Address Translation) to hide the LAN segment. Depending on the brand, most routers assign the LAN segment IPs in the 192.168.0.x or 192.168.1.x range.

Without the router, you'll need to setup ICS (Internet Connection Sharing) on the Windows host computer. ICS is Microsoft's version of a software implemented router. ICS also assigns IP addresses in 1 or the other of those ranges So, in either case, you're using a router (1 hardware based and the other is software based).

These days, with the advent of the bouadband routers, ISP's can't and most don't even try to dictate that you can't use a hardware router but you can use the "software [ICS] router".


0

Response Number 4
Name: iamc
Date: February 22, 2005 at 09:14:23 Pacific
Reply:

"I just want to know if any ISOs are especially geared towards a network via ethernet"

All Linux distributions are "specifically geared" towards ethernet networking. Let me ask you this: if Knoppix, Mandrake, and Redhat don't do what you are looking for, what is it exactly that you want to do?


0

Response Number 5
Name: 3Dave
Date: February 23, 2005 at 01:55:30 Pacific
Reply:

There is no difference if you use a
hub/switch or a crossover cable....the
machines will have to be set up the same.
FishMonger's NAT'd router solution is
probably the best way to go.


0

Related Posts

See More



Sponsored Link
Ads by Google
Reply to Message Icon






Post Locked

This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.


Go to Linux Forum Home


Sponsored links

Ads by Google


Results for: Windows (server) with Linux viaCAT5

networking with linux and windows 2000 www.computing.net/answers/linux/networking-with-linux-and-windows-2000/10237.html

redhat slow compared to windows www.computing.net/answers/linux/redhat-slow-compared-to-windows/13820.html

Networking with Linux www.computing.net/answers/linux/networking-with-linux/14284.html