Computing.Net > Forums > Linux > Small Linux for 486 4mb RAM

Computer Problems? Computing.Net has over 1,000,000 posts about all things technology related! Over 90% answered within 24 hours! Click here to start participating now! Also, be sure to check out the New User Guide.

Small Linux for 486 4mb RAM

Reply to Message Icon

Name: KalasMannen
Date: January 16, 2006 at 08:53:46 Pacific
OS: Windows XP sp2
CPU/Ram: Intel p4 3.2 HT, 1024 ddr
Comment:

Hello!
I have an old 486 running at 33mhz and with 4mb ram, and i want to be able to hook it to my network. I tried dos first, but it couldn't get it on the network, so i tried FreeBSD, didn't boot from the disks, says that it can't find a kernel on the bootdisk, so i looked on the net for some kind of Linux that will run on my hardware.

I found 2 alternatives, tomsrtbt wich i don't know if you can install to a harddrive, and minix 3 that requiers a cd-rom. Minix3 Would be great, if it existed on floppies only install, but it appears that you need a cd-rom to install it..

So what can you guys recommend? I wan't a small Linux or similiar that has installation floppies so i can put it on my harddrive. It must fit on the hardrive that is 200mb and it would be great if i could hook it to the network. It must also run on my machine wich has 33mhz 486 and 4mb RAM.

Thanks!



Sponsored Link
Ads by Google

Response Number 1
Name: Grusomhat
Date: January 16, 2006 at 09:35:15 Pacific
Reply:

DSL is a great Linux that i bilieve would run on your computer Just google "DSL" or "Damn Small Linux" not sure were you can download it from but i used bittorrent to get mine. Heres a page to start looking at any way [url]http://www.damnsmalllinux.org]http://www.damnsmalllinux.org[/url]

Ignorance is Bliss but Knowledge is Power


0

Response Number 2
Name: Grusomhat
Date: January 16, 2006 at 09:36:15 Pacific
Reply:

Any help on creating links would be appreciated as i dont seem very good Thanks and good luck getting with DSL

Ignorance is Bliss but Knowledge is Power


0

Response Number 3
Name: KalasMannen
Date: January 16, 2006 at 09:43:39 Pacific
Reply:

Thanks but DSL seems to need 16mb RAM and i only have 4mb to play with :S

Thanks for the tip, might come in handy :D


0

Response Number 4
Name: Jake2
Date: January 16, 2006 at 10:15:47 Pacific
Reply:

16Mb is minimum for X. 4Mb is the minimum for command-line only. DSL might need the ram during the installation process for decompression, but actually running Linux should only take 4Mb.

You could pop the hard drive into your XP machine for installation.

I'm curious why FreeBSD didn't work. Did you try version 4.11 or something newer? I'd go with 4.11 for that machine.


0

Response Number 5
Name: KalasMannen
Date: January 16, 2006 at 10:38:56 Pacific
Reply:

I was trying to run FreeBSD 6.0, the floppies that is.. I read that the minimum should be a 386 with 4mb of RAM or something, but when i tried to boot it i stopped when i tried to load the kernel for installation, it said that there was no kernel to be found..

FreeBSD would be a great alternative since i've got some (limited) experience of it from before, so it's a pity that it didn't work. :(

I might do as you say though and try 4.11? Or maybe some other version that is before 6.0 and see if that makes any difference..


0

Related Posts

See More



Response Number 6
Name: KalasMannen
Date: January 16, 2006 at 10:52:24 Pacific
Reply:

Well i've tried to run it again, this time with 5.4 and boot from the floppy... It says "elf32_loadimage: read failed"

And after a few retries it says unable to load kernel!.. Any ideas?


0

Response Number 7
Name: Jake2
Date: January 16, 2006 at 13:44:46 Pacific
Reply:

I really think 4.11 would be best. It's the last version before the developers started introducing SMP optimizations that adversely affect UP performance, and somewhere around 5.x or 6.x I think FreeBSD broke pure 386 support and possibly 486 as well.

NetBSD and OpenBSD both support floppy/FTP installations as well, and I don't think you'd have any trouble fitting either into 200Mb if you don't install X. Of the two, NetBSD would probably be better because its focus is simplicity and corectness whereas OpenBSD focuses on security.


0

Response Number 8
Name: gdivens51
Date: January 16, 2006 at 19:37:53 Pacific
Reply:

http://www.linuxlinks.com/Distributions/Mini_Distributions/


0

Response Number 9
Name: 3Dave
Date: January 17, 2006 at 08:41:59 Pacific
Reply:

You may find this link useful, it covers desktops as well as laptops:
http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/4mb-Laptops.html


0

Sponsored Link
Ads by Google
Reply to Message Icon






Post Locked

This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.


Go to Linux Forum Home


Sponsored links

Ads by Google


Results for: Small Linux for 486 4mb RAM

linux for 386SX 4MB Ram www.computing.net/answers/linux/linux-for-386sx-4mb-ram/2887.html

Small Linux distributions?? www.computing.net/answers/linux/small-linux-distributions/3617.html

Damn Small Linux Install www.computing.net/answers/linux/damn-small-linux-install/27068.html