Computing.Net > Forums > Linux > Small Linux distribution

Computer Problems? Computing.Net has over 1,000,000 posts about all things technology related! Click here to start participating now! Also, check out the New User Guide.

Small Linux distribution

Reply to Message Icon

Name: Vladimir88
Date: November 29, 2005 at 01:46:11 Pacific
OS: Windows 98 SE, Windows XP
CPU/Ram: Celeron 850 MHz, 128 MB S
Comment:

Hello dudes!
A firend of mine is trying to build a small home network (LAN) and he intends to use his old 386 machine as a server. At the moment this machine has Windows 3.1 installed.
Apparently, Windows 3.1 is not the best choice for running a server on, so we decided to install Linux. The machine's HDD volume is 81 MB, so we needed a small linux distribution.
We tried to install muLinux on a floppy disk but something went wrong and we were unable to even launch the OS.
My question is: what is a good Linux distribution that would do the job in this case?
It should be small (less than 81 MB) and light and it should be easy to use since we are both newbies in the world of Linux.
Thanks!



Sponsored Link
Ads by Google

Response Number 1
Name: 3Dave
Date: November 30, 2005 at 04:40:03 Pacific
Reply:

What services do you want this server to provide? Have you tried FreeSCO? It can provide the following:
* a simple bridge with up to 10 Ethernet segments
* a router with up to 10 Ethernet segments
* a dialup line router
* a leased line router
* an Ethernet router
* a dial-in server with up to 10 modems (with multiport modems).
* a time server
* a dhcp server
* a http server
* a ftp server
* a dns server
* a ssh server
* a print server (requires TCP/IP printing client software)

And all this fits onto a bootable floppy which you don't even need to install to your hard drive.

http://www.freesco.org/


0

Response Number 2
Name: MikeAtVillage
Date: November 30, 2005 at 07:39:45 Pacific
Reply:

Will he not also need smb to allow his Windows PC (I'm assuming) to connect to share on this server ?


0

Response Number 3
Name: 3Dave
Date: December 1, 2005 at 01:41:32 Pacific
Reply:

Hmmm...I didn't think about windoze...I very rarely do! He could still use FTP/HTTP to transfer files but if the hard drive is only 81Mb there is not going to be much room to store files on the server. The windoze PCs on the network will still be able to talk to each other and transfer files without having samba on the server as one of the workstations will become browse master.


0

Response Number 4
Name: ket
Date: December 1, 2005 at 19:28:06 Pacific
Reply:

I think you will find DamnSmall linux useful for your purpose.


0

Sponsored Link
Ads by Google
Reply to Message Icon

Related Posts

See More


mouse w/ suse 9.3 Cannot get bootloader to ...



Post Locked

This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.


Go to Linux Forum Home


Sponsored links

Ads by Google


Results for: Small Linux distribution

Small Linux distributions?? www.computing.net/answers/linux/small-linux-distributions/3617.html

Damn Small Linux Kernel Source www.computing.net/answers/linux/damn-small-linux-kernel-source/26967.html

need linux distribution tips www.computing.net/answers/linux/need-linux-distribution-tips/26491.html