Computing.Net > Forums > Linux > LogWatch long unidentified 'other'

Computer Problems? Computing.Net has over 1,000,000 posts about all things technology related! Over 90% answered within 24 hours! Click here to start participating now! Also, be sure to check out the New User Guide.

LogWatch long unidentified 'other'

Reply to Message Icon

Name: fuad
Date: July 9, 2004 at 10:19:34 Pacific
OS: Fedora C 2
CPU/Ram: 1 g / 380m
Comment:

does any body know what is this? thanks for any help!
I usually get the following LogWatch for http server with long long of the following:
--------------------- httpd B

A total of 1 sites probed the server
217.229.16.130

A total of 2 unidentified 'other' records logged
SEARCH
/\x90\x02\xb1\x02\xb1\x02\xb1\x02\xb1\x02\xb1\x02\xb1\x02\xb1\x02\xb1\x02\xb1\x02
\xb1\x02\xb1\x02\xb1\x02\xb1\x02\xb1\x02\xb1\xx02\xb1\x02\xb1\x02\xb1\x02\xb1\x02\
xb1\x02\xb1\x02\xb1\x02\xb1\x02\xb1\x02\xb1\x02\xb1\x02\xb1\x02\xb1\x02\xb1\x02\x
b1\x02\xb1\x02\xb1\x02\xb1\x02\xb1\x02\xb1\x02\xb1\x02\xb1\x02\xb1\x02\xb1\x02\xb
1\x02\xb1\x02\xb1\x02\xb1\x02\xb1\x02\xb1\x02\xb1\x02\xb1\x02\xb1\x02\xb1\x

.......... ..etc




Sponsored Link
Ads by Google

Response Number 1
Name: Peeyush Maurya
Date: July 9, 2004 at 10:46:13 Pacific
Reply:

as far as i know junk character in log of apache(httpd) mean u have been hacked

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
http://www.peeyush.tk/
http://geocities.com/peeyush_maurya/
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


0

Response Number 2
Name: fuad
Date: July 9, 2004 at 23:05:24 Pacific
Reply:

Thank you for the reply; so, how can I protect myself. and how do I know which things to check.
thanks


0

Response Number 3
Name: 3Dave
Date: July 10, 2004 at 01:37:01 Pacific
Reply:

Looks like it's probably someone trying to exploit a buffer overflow....just make sure that you are running a new/secure/patched version of apache and anything else that may be accessed (eg perl). Thankfully most hacks seemed to be aimed at M$ IIS....


0

Response Number 4
Name: fuad
Date: July 10, 2004 at 13:33:28 Pacific
Reply:

Thanks Dave, how do I know about perl. and also sendmail, will the log file be enough. Thanks


0

Response Number 5
Name: 3Dave
Date: July 12, 2004 at 02:55:06 Pacific
Reply:

If you are not using perl on your website (eg with CGI scripts) then you don't have to worry about it.

With fedota you can use apt-get or yum to make sure that you are running up to date versions of software.

Do you really need to run sendmail? You can download the source and security patches from http://www.sendmail.org/. You probably have a relatively new version anyway is you are running Fedora C2.

If you are security concious then maybe installing tripwire is a good idea (http://www.tripwire.org/). It wont prevent hacks but will inform you of any if they happen. Nessus (http://www.nessus.org/) is a good security scanner which you can run on your machine to check for any vulnerabilities.


0

Related Posts

See More



Response Number 6
Name: fuad
Date: July 13, 2004 at 08:47:03 Pacific
Reply:

Thanks Dave,
In fact I need sendmail for Mailman mailing lists. I am tring these tools now. Thank you again.


0

Response Number 7
Name: 3Dave
Date: July 13, 2004 at 09:19:51 Pacific
Reply:

Sendmail can be a b17ch to configure unless you know what you are doing. The .cf config file is one of the very few GNU/Linux files which is not quite as straight forward as plain text and is confusing to read (unless you're a sendmail guru!=o). Instead you edit an .m4 file which is easier to read and then use m4 to create a .cf file....all rather confusing.

A much easier way to configure it (as well as your entire system) is to install webmin (www.webmin.com) which I strongly recommend.


0

Response Number 8
Name: fuad
Date: July 13, 2004 at 12:15:21 Pacific
Reply:

You are right, I have configured it with webmin. and it is working just fine. Webmin is a very good tool.


0

Response Number 9
Name: WaltzKing
Date: August 17, 2004 at 13:24:08 Pacific
Reply:

These entries should be identified as a "probe" , rather than an unidentified 'other' entry. There is a bug in logwatch-5.1 (which is fixed in logwatch-5.2) that cause the parser to identify these lines incorrectly. You can fix this by editing the "http" logwatch script or by upgrading to the lasted logwatch version. If you go the editing route, look for lines like these:
'\\x90\\x02\\xb1\\x02\\xb1',
'\\x02\\xb1\\x02\\xb1',
'\\x90\\x90\\x90\\x90',
'\\x04\\x01',
'\\x05\\x01',
and add another backslash to each pair so they look like this:
'\\\x90\\\x02\\\xb1\\\x02\\\xb1',
'\\\x02\\\xb1\\\x02\\\xb1',
'\\\x90\\\x90\\\x90\\\x90',
'\\\x04\\\x01',
'\\\x05\\\x01',



0

Response Number 10
Name: fuad
Date: August 19, 2004 at 11:01:14 Pacific
Reply:

Thank you WaltzKing, I have upgraded to 5.2.2. and hopefully that will fix it.


0

Sponsored Link
Ads by Google
Reply to Message Icon

compilling 2.6.6 woes (ur... Linspire / lindows



Post Locked

This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.


Go to Linux Forum Home


Sponsored links

Ads by Google


Results for: LogWatch long unidentified 'other'

RedHat 7.0 www.computing.net/answers/linux/redhat-70-/4146.html

Which Linux to use www.computing.net/answers/linux/which-linux-to-use/24122.html

Why is Linux slow? www.computing.net/answers/linux/why-is-linux-slow/14371.html