|
|
|
Linux.... *Scraches Head* What one
|
Original Message
|
Name: Metthew
Date: July 17, 2004 at 16:38:32 Pacific
Subject: Linux.... *Scraches Head* What one OS: 98seCPU/Ram: 1.4/256mb |
Comment: I know absolutly NOTHING about linux sept that its called Linux. I need to most Stable Fastest Coolest & the moast slim looking Ver. I talked to my bro he said somthing about get the right ver. for your hdware mainboard: M7VIG Pro twin hdd: total of 120gb Ram: 512mb DDR266 CPU: AMD Athlon XP 2600+ CD-rom: Artec MadDog 52x32x52 burner floppy: no floppy I plan on formating bolth hdds and deleting windows xp completly off my hdds and just having linux on there with linux installed just on one hdd cus i need one of my hdd for my vids. Peace ICQ me for help with any computer problems you might have. 270056517 Matt
Report Offensive Message For Removal
|
|
Response Number 2
|
Name: Tony Iommi
Date: July 17, 2004 at 19:59:22 Pacific
Subject: Linux.... *Scraches Head* What one
|
Reply: (edit)Ummm..... The hell it is. Fedora Core is a branch off of Redhat
Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal
|
|
Response Number 3
|
Name: anenefan
Date: July 17, 2004 at 20:52:26 Pacific
Subject: Linux.... *Scraches Head* What one |
Reply: (edit)Hi Install floppy drive first thing. You're gunna be a bit lost without one. Next install a distro that understands that you don't have a phd in linux. (ie. tries to aviod hi tech jargon and obscure desciptions) One of the better ones is Mandrake. I favour Mandrake as it is moderately stable. On the first install, will get most services that you expect of a computer up and running. Coolest? Well for starters - it aint Microsoft -thats cool.
Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal
|
|
Response Number 4
|
Name: Wolfbone
Date: July 17, 2004 at 22:02:38 Pacific
Subject: Linux.... *Scraches Head* What one |
Reply: (edit)Stable: Slackware,Debian,... Fastest: Gentoo from a stage-1 build with machine specific optimization. Given your hardware and likely usage though, you shouldn't need to worry about either stability or speed. Coolness is irrelevant, initial appearance is irrelevant. The right version of a distro is almost invariably the latest one and the slimness of any installation is up to you. It's pointless trying to predict which distro will suit you and your hardware best and since you can try them all without much risk of hardware destruction, bankruptcy, disease or death, you should just repeatedly stick a pin in the list at distrowatch.
Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal
|
|
Response Number 5
|
Name: hwood
Date: July 18, 2004 at 13:46:15 Pacific
Subject: Linux.... *Scraches Head* What one
|
Reply: (edit)I am not sure why anenefan mentioned "Install floppy drive first thing. You're gunna be a bit lost without one.", maybe Mandrake needs one. Many distributions can be downloaded from various websites as CDRom images. Once these images are burned to CD, you can boot and start the install from the first CD (no boot floppy required.) I personally am mainly familiar with the RedHat distributions, Including 7.2/7.3, 9.0, Fedora and Enterprise 3.0 (a commercial version.) I have installed each of those on a number of systems with minimal effort and no problems after completing the setup. Of the RedHat distributions I would recommend either 9.0 or Fedora as they have additional drivers built-in to handle the more recent devices in the newer systems. All of the versions of Redhat I mentioned install easily using the default settings and come with the Gnome desktop (a GUI similar to Windows) I have never had any stability problems with "Redhat".
Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal
|
|
Response Number 6
|
Name: anenefan
Date: July 18, 2004 at 17:55:50 Pacific
Subject: Linux.... *Scraches Head* What one |
Reply: (edit)Hi Who was interested in the installing part, thats the easy bit. Work with any system long enough, and you find a lot of good tools over the net unpack on a floppy. (like bootable diagnostics) A newbie isn't going to work out a way around it.
Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal
|
|
Response Number 7
|
Name: Dlonra
Date: July 18, 2004 at 18:33:06 Pacific
Subject: Linux.... *Scraches Head* What one |
Reply: (edit)my 2c: I have Mandrake,RH and Fedora installed. I find my old (8.2) mandrake a bit faster to startup, but I can not detect any noticeable runtime speed difference in the other distros. With your CPU,RAM and HDD storage,any current distro should run well and fast. You definitely do not need a floppy for linux. The only software I have encountered that requires one is called "linux on diskette" - used for trouble shooting. Knoppix (linux which runs from a CD) does an equally good, if not better, job. (BTW, I always boot from floppy, so I am not anti-flop) What you do need is google: linux tutorial linux install tutorial
Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal
|
|
Response Number 8
|
Name: 3Dave
Date: July 19, 2004 at 06:00:18 Pacific
Subject: Linux.... *Scraches Head* What one |
Reply: (edit)Of my two machines at home which have had mandrake and slackware on them for eons....neither have had a floppy drive.
Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal
|
|
Response Number 9
|
Name: anenefan
Date: July 19, 2004 at 08:26:08 Pacific
Subject: Linux.... *Scraches Head* What one |
Reply: (edit)Hi I didn't say linux needed a floppy drive. But I will agree the way it reads - it implied that. Things are easier for a newbie if they create a lilo boot disk though. (unless they are using grub) You may operate without one, but it is somewhat tiresome when things go wrong. If nothing goes wrong thats cool. Newbies though always seem to have some sort of problem, sooner or latter. Floppy drives are not all that expensive. It is an extra booting device that will come in handy. eg bootable diagnostics, tools or as quick boot recovery device. A floppy drive suits a newbies needs as an easy temporary medium to shift small files about between machines. eg pdfs and txt files. To an experienced user (whichever os) a floppy might not seem important, until they have to diagnose an intermittent problem involving one or both ide channels. A bit hard without booting a floppy diagnostic.
Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal
|
|
Response Number 10
|
Name: Dlonra
Date: July 19, 2004 at 08:40:24 Pacific
Subject: Linux.... *Scraches Head* What one |
Reply: (edit)in practice, I agree with anenefan. I have 2 boxes, both with diskettes including 1 with a 5 1/4 drive (honest to gosh - haven't used it in a lonng time). I would never configure a system without diskette. However, with a 52x32x52 burner and R/W CD's, you can approach diskette-like use of a CD. I have never run into IDE channel problems. Most of mine fall into the careless user category. Booting from diskette has greatly reduced the impact of this category.
Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal
|
|
Response Number 11
|
Name: 3Dave
Date: July 20, 2004 at 20:41:36 Pacific
Subject: Linux.... *Scraches Head* What one |
Reply: (edit)I agree and would recommend that you don't skip the "make a boot floppy" section in just about every distro I have tried....and also make a backup of that floppy!
Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal
|
|
Response Number 12
|
Name: Hmmm
Date: July 21, 2004 at 12:25:56 Pacific
Subject: Linux.... *Scraches Head* What one |
Reply: (edit)The Simply Linux Book-http://jetblackz.cjb.net/ would be worth a read first before you start. It has a lot of good info reguarding Linux for those new to it.
Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal
|
|
Response Number 13
|
Name: Mseitz
Date: July 21, 2004 at 19:54:49 Pacific
Subject: Linux.... *Scraches Head* What one
|
Reply: (edit)Yeh, had the same question about which distro of Linux to install. Knoppix was by far the easiest- boots and runs from a CD, problem was everything ran a little slow. Suse 9.1 had sweet graphics, everything worked at the start except for the dual boot to Xp. Couldn't figure out how to mod the bootloader or how to add programs from Yast(?) without becoming a member. Simular good/bad issues with Mandrake. Super easy in install, most things worked at startup but could only find "last years model" 9.2. Mandrake 10.0 and updates may be for members only. I'm not 100% on this. Can anyone verify? Favorite is Fedora core 2. I use apt-get and yum for extra program install and update. Use yum.comf from: fedorafaq.orq/samples/yum.conf Apt-get from: dag.wieers.com/packages/apt/ FC2 i386 Do yum update, apt-get update then apt-get install synaptic. Synaptic is an easy to use, graphical, update utility.
Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal
|

|

|
Use following form to reply to current message:
|
|

|