Computing.Net > Forums > Linux > DEACENT 486 distro

Computer Problems? Computing.Net has over 1,000,000 posts about all things technology related! Over 90% answered within 24 hours! Click here to start participating now! Also, be sure to check out the New User Guide.

DEACENT 486 distro

Reply to Message Icon

Name: Mac
Date: February 21, 2002 at 18:22:47 Pacific
Comment:

its such an awful shame to toss a 486. windows abandoned them nearly a decade ago! its up to linux to make these fallen soldiers ride again.

so which distro provides a workable interface for newbies(IE a GUI) and will run on the following:
486SX2/66MHz
53 Megs of ram
2 gig HD
1MB vid card

i have several of these machines, i just couldnt let anyone throw them away. what do people sudgest as a viable distro? i've looked at peanut, vector, and all the floppy-oppy's(which drive me nuts). mandrake 6.1 AND red hat7.2 all refuse to install on less than 64 megs of ram. slackware is TOO hard! debain and suse all like 64 megs too, or atleast the only versions i could find did.

i wanna have phun with it using apache n' whatever else will boost the networking skills.

thanks!



Sponsored Link
Ads by Google

Response Number 1
Name: Rapidweather
Date: February 21, 2002 at 18:48:30 Pacific
Reply:

Just some thoughts on the older 486 situation. I have an IBM PS/1 with a 25mhz
bus, upgraded to an Evergreen 586 processor,and 32 MB of 30-pin ram.
I have a 1 GB hard drive. I dual boot Redhat 6.1 and Windows 95. It runs both of them fairly well, but slow compared to other machines that I have that are at least
Pentium 75 or 90 based.
Now, back to the IBM PS/1. I hooked up a 50x cdrom drive to do the Redhat install, and used dos interlnk/intersvr to place all of the win95 installer files on the drive through the serial port. I can run Opera 6 on both OS's.
I can use KDE, Gnome or AnotherLevel in
Redhat. Win 95, once set up, is very nice, but Redhat will give you years of
fun with the configuration. Go to:
http://www.rapidweather.com and look down the page for the "linux" button, and
there is information on how to get your
Redhat 6.1 connected to the internet without using the kppp setup. One thing about 486's, however. They should be upgraded to run linux, or you will need a nice glacier outside your window to watch while you wait and wait for things to happen. linux really needs a pentium of some sort to do well. I have run Windows 98 on the PS/1, and it is as good as win 95, but again, too easy to set up. Linux is great fun if you have a little experience fooling around with it.


0

Response Number 2
Name: littlejon
Date: February 22, 2002 at 12:03:37 Pacific
Reply:


Have you tried mulinux. Its an expandable floppy version with x11 windows expansion available and can run Netscape 3.0 if all is "cloned" to hardrive. Netscape 3.0 cant be run if using mu in ramdisk only.

Far as I know this is best and most complete version of Linux to run on 386 and 486 computers.


0

Sponsored Link
Ads by Google
Reply to Message Icon

Related Posts

See More







Post Locked

This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.


Go to Linux Forum Home


Sponsored links

Ads by Google


Results for: DEACENT 486 distro

what distro to choose for 486 www.computing.net/answers/linux/what-distro-to-choose-for-486/27315.html

Version or distro of linux run in a 486? www.computing.net/answers/linux/version-or-distro-of-linux-run-in-a-486/7806.html

the best distro! www.computing.net/answers/linux/the-best-distro/22152.html