Computing.Net > Forums > General Hardware > To upgrade or not to upgrade

Computer Problems? Computing.Net has over 1,000,000 posts about all things technology related! Over 90% answered within 24 hours! Click here to start participating now! Also, be sure to check out the New User Guide.

To upgrade or not to upgrade

Reply to Message Icon

Name: hakoreh (by hakoreh21)
Date: December 14, 2004 at 11:53:00 Pacific
OS: Windows XP Pro SP2
CPU/Ram: P4 2.8GHZ 533MHZ FSB/1GB
Comment:

Hey there,

First thanks in advance to anyonee who can offer their expertise. I built my system about two-three years ago. It is still running well but there are the occasional slowdowns even with 1GB ram. I'm mainly interested in an AMD Athlon 64 (undecided on speed), PCI Express, & SATA I and II.

Based on my specs below, what do you all think I should do?

Intel D850EMV2 Motherboard
Intel 2.8GHZ 533FSB CPU
1GB Samsung DDR PC800 RAM
Creative Audigy 2
ATI All in Wonder 9700 Pro
Sony DRU500A (getting a dual layer already)
TDK 40X CDRW/CDR Burner
160GB Maxtor ATA133 HD
WD 40GB ATA133 HD

Thanks to all who reply...

Morris



Sponsored Link
Ads by Google

Response Number 1
Name: OtheHill
Date: December 14, 2004 at 12:29:57 Pacific
Reply:

To upgrade simply because there is something better out there is a unattainable goal. That said, if your machine still meets your needs most of the time then maybe all you really need is a system cleanup/ tuneup. Do you perform regular system maintenence? Scandisk, defrag, spyware/malware removal. As far as what you are considering goes, SATA drives aren't much faster than ATA drives. PCI Express is in its infancy. Any graphics cards available won't be drastically faster than AGP versions of the same chip. In Short, there aren't many compelling reasons to run to these new technologies, except for the fact that they come along with the Athlon64 boards. If you are upgrading and need new drives and graphics, it makes sense to go that way to get the most time out of the upgrades.


0

Response Number 2
Name: ValuCPU
Date: December 14, 2004 at 13:57:34 Pacific
Reply:

If you do choose to upgrade, then i would get
a 939 pin Athlon 64 & motherboard as I feel
that these will hold the greatest upgrade
potential in years to come, If you chose to
go down this route, be aware that these are
VERY expensive and that you should not settle
for any motherboard that does not support
PCI-Express, that would just be stupid, Athlon
64 motherboards with PCI-Express support are
only just appearing on the market so you
might have to wait a little while. If you
wait and take an Nforce 4 motherboard then
you will have the ability to run 2
PCI-Express Nvidia cards (from the 6600 / 6800
families) together with 1 output, giving
about 70% better performance than a single
card through Nvidia's SLI technology, this
would, however mean scrapping your graphics
card, but may be worth-while given the geater long-term upgrade potential.
What ever you decide something faster will
allways be around the corner ;-)
Merry Christmas!

Never argue with the fellow that packs your parachute


0

Response Number 3
Name: ComputerDude929
Date: December 14, 2004 at 14:12:34 Pacific
Reply:

IMO that is still a very nice system you have there, perhaps, as others have already mentioned, you should take a good close look at your software and OS.

Computer nut since 1985 and still loving it...


0

Response Number 4
Name: SkipCox
Date: December 14, 2004 at 16:44:21 Pacific
Reply:

I gotta agree. My system is 3 years old and does everything I ask of it. You have a nicer machine and I can't imagine anything it won't do unless you're into high end video editing or cad.

I'd like a new A64 system with pci express too but feel I need to wait for another year or so for a better deal with better components.

Skip


0

Response Number 5
Name: j1mbo
Date: December 15, 2004 at 04:20:52 Pacific
Reply:

If money's no object then why not - if your on any kind of budget I'd stick with the P4 you've got already.

I don't have any slow-downs doing everyday tasks on my P3-866(oc'ed just a little hehe), OtheHill hit the nail on the head.


j1mbo

Win2k / MEPIS linux
PIII 966 / 640MB


0

Related Posts

See More



Response Number 6
Name: atarileaf
Date: December 15, 2004 at 06:15:22 Pacific
Reply:

Actually CAD and video editing is perfectly reasonable with the system the original poster has. IMO, his system is still an excellent system and upgrading is unnecessary.

Asus K8V-X
Athlon 64 2800+
ATI Radeon 9550
512 PC3200
20 Gig Maxtor & 80 SATA HD's
HP CD-RW
LG DVD


0

Response Number 7
Name: Free Weasel
Date: December 15, 2004 at 10:12:25 Pacific
Reply:

@ValuCPU
Sound like I'm stupid because I will do exactly that, buying a socket939 AGP board with a Athlon64 3000+! ;)

The reason is my Athlon TBird 1,2@1,33GHz, 512MB SD Ram becomes too slow lately but a you wrote a new PCIe system would be too costly.
By taking an AGP board I can still keep my FX5900XT graphic card which which should be enough for the next years.

And by the way, with the long-term upgrade potential there maybe a problem with BTX cases, SATA300 and most likely double core cpus from both Intel and AMD. Noone knows if those cpus fit on the actual boards!


@Morris
In your case I'd wait a while and see where this leads. There are quite a lot of changes at the moment and still coming.


0

Sponsored Link
Ads by Google
Reply to Message Icon






Post Locked

This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.


Go to General Hardware Forum Home


Sponsored links

Ads by Google


Results for: To upgrade or not to upgrade

to upgrade or not to upgrade what www.computing.net/answers/hardware/to-upgrade-or-not-to-upgrade-what-/40803.html

Raid or Not to Raid...... www.computing.net/answers/hardware/raid-or-not-to-raid/50316.html

upgrade or not www.computing.net/answers/hardware/upgrade-or-not/31743.html