Tom's Guide | Tom's Hardware | Tom's Games
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
I just got a second 80GB SATA HDD and I plugged it up. I never had two before so I never installed the RAID drivers. I tried installing the drivers and everything was fine until I restarted my PC. I got blue screen before windows even loaded so I restarted my PC and restored it. Were can I find RAID drivers that won't mess up my PC?
P.S. I have a Soltek SL-K8AN2E-GR motherboard. I tried there drivers from the website but the same thing happened.
AMD Athlon 64 3300+
512 MB DDR SDRAM
ATI RADEON 9700 Pro
Samsung 160GB HDD
Windows XP Home Edition

Are you trying to install RAID 0 or RAID 1?
RAID 0 makes your 2 disks look like one big one. It is NOT recommended, as a failure of either disk will result in total loss of data on both. It has no noticeable benefit on speed.
RAID 1 is mirroring the disks - only one drive is seen, and data is written to both in parallel, making the second a "mirror" of the first. This is great for avoiding down time or loss of data if a disk fails, but still requires regular external backups, as other errors can result in corrupted data.
Personally, I think RAID 5 is the only one worth bothering with, but that runs pricey!.
Are you sure you really want to run RAID?

I agree will oldfogey. Don't use RAID unless you have an overwhelming reason to do so, like mission critical data storage.
You don't have to run RAID. There seems to be a misconception that two SATA drives must be configured as a RAID array as the drivers for both SATA and RAID are loaded at the same point during the installation procedure. Two SATA drives can be configured independently just like PATA drives.
Stuart

Well I just wanted to try a RAID because I am always trying new things. I was going to try to do a RAID 0, but if its not that great then I guess I won't. So how do I configure it to run seperatly? Also, how do I remove the password on my setup? I tried taking out the lithium battery then putting it back in but that didn't clear the CMOS I guess.
AMD Athlon 64 3300+
512 MB DDR SDRAM
ATI RADEON 9700 Pro
Samsung 160GB HDD
Windows XP Home Edition

There is nothing wrong with trying new things at all..As a matter of fact I encourage it..
Raid set-ups are nothing to be scared off if configured correctly.....
I have run a raid 0 array since the very first mother boards came out with the IDE raid controllers, with no trouble at all..Wel except the ones that I caused.
The only way you can lose anything is if the drive fails altogether, but no diff to having a single drive do the same thing on a standard set-up.
On most controllers you will need 2 or more drives before you can build a raid array, there are some which will accept a single drive and still create a raid array.
Tho whole point of raid is for system and file read and write perfomance...Raid 0 in particular..Most common use is for video editing...as you can format the drive in 64 K cluster size for optimum performance, against the normal default of 4K for XP.
You support CD will have a raid array manager tool on it, if you install it and configure the tool it will warn you far in advance of impending disk fail...And it will also tell you how to install a new drive and rebuild the array with no data loss...
You can even change boards, providing the new board has the same raid controller and you don't delete the raid array, and also remember which drive was connected to which port..
Installation of the OS is a little diff than normal, special drivers are needed and they are supplied ether on floppy or on the CD with a floppy drive creator.
Unlike normal drivers raid driver needs to be installed before the windows installer event starts to copy the folder to the drive.. Note the very first blue screen of the XP install. At the bottom it says press PF6 to install additional drivers etc...Other wise the installer will not even recognise the hard d rives.
This is a SCSI interface used on large servers for many many years....
So if you want have a play with raid GO DO IT, all its going to cost you is a bit of time, but a darn good learning exercise I say.....
IF IT AINT BROKE, DONT FIX IT
A8N-SLI Deluxe
AMD X64 3500+ Wnchst
Corsair 2x512 DDR400 Dual Channel
GV-NX6600128D PCIX Graphics Card
Ggbyte GT Pro CPU Cooler
Zalman VF700-CU VGA Cool

>> The only way you can lose anything is if the drive fails altogether, but no diff to having a single drive do the same thing on a standard set-up. <<
Not true. If you have a software error that prevents the OS from loading and have to reinstall the OS you have lost your RAID array although the disks my be in perfect working order. Recovering data from a broken RAID O array is nigh on impossible
>> Tho whole point of raid is for system and file read and write perfomance...Raid 0 in particular..<<
Not true. The whole point of RAID is redundancy. (Redundant Array of Inexpensive Disks) Only RAID 0 promises a performance increase at the expense of redundancy and even then it is minimal. Most RAID configurations cause a performance hit because data has to written twice. There are configurations that will bring the performance up to normal using a combination of stripped and mirrored drives, but that usually requires fours drives.
Stuart

Not true. If you have a software error that prevents the OS from loading and have to reinstall the OS you have lost your RAID array although the disks my be in perfect working order. Recovering data from a broken RAID O array is nigh on impossible
Aboe statement is not coorect !!!!!!!!!
A faultu program can only prevent the OS from booting but will NOT I repeat WILL NOT delete the array !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The only way to actualy delete the stripe or any other array is to do it YOURSELF MANUALY !!!!!!! first you need to delete the partitons, than you neet to delete the arraythrough the raid controller BIOS....
recovery of an os on raid setupis not diff to normal setups, you can infact delete the C partition altogether and reinstate it, and as long as you dont delete any of the other partiitons all data will stay there.
Ben there done this a number of times, just to rey what can or can not be done !!!!!!!
It is a known fact that raid arrays have a much faster file read and write times that has been proven time and time again, i particular if you use the high speed drives like the Raptor 10K units... Dont forget that in a stripe o array data is not written twice !!! But once only and in a random order, over a number of drives not just a particular one !!!!!!!!!I say again as long as YOU dont delete the array you can recover........
I suggest you have a bit more of aread and study into this !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I have ued and still do use Raid 0 with 100% stability and absltly no data loss at any time !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I am also unfortunate to be part of the team at work who look afater a Raid 5 corporate setup with about 2 tbts of corpporate data storage etc, so i sort of think that gives me slight edge... But mind you if you would like to swap by all means, the whole system is old and its driving us nuts !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Nothign wrong with raid , set it up correctly it it works a treat !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
IF IT AINT BROKE, DONT FIX IT
A8N-SLI Deluxe
AMD X64 3500+ Wnchst
Corsair 2x512 DDR400 Dual Channel
GV-NX6600128D PCIX Graphics Card
Ggbyte GT Pro CPU Cooler
Zalman VF700-CU VGA Cool

God I just cant help my self !!!!!!!!!!!
Why do people knock something whe it works, and trying to discourage someone from learning about things like that is a negative stance !!!!!!!!!!!!
How about we help and encourage these people that like to learn and try new things .........
Explain the good and the negatives of each I agree but dont knock somehting that works, just cos you dont / we dont like it.
Boogyman !!!
Go d it !!!!!!!!!!!!!! And have fun, you wil soon know if its for you or not !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
IF IT AINT BROKE, DONT FIX IT
A8N-SLI Deluxe
AMD X64 3500+ Wnchst
Corsair 2x512 DDR400 Dual Channel
GV-NX6600128D PCIX Graphics Card
Ggbyte GT Pro CPU Cooler
Zalman VF700-CU VGA Cool

Fine to experiment if you understand the risks - the reason RAID 0 is criticised so often on the forum is that so many users don't understand what it is for, and don't understand the risk.
It can give a speed increase in particular situations - basically to do with heavy disk use and large files - which are not that common for most domestic users.
The risk is that if one disk fails, the data off BOTH disks is lost; agreed this is not a much greater risk than having one V large disk, but when so many people see "RAID" and think "data security", without understanding the nature of the beast.
Even RAID 5 is not 100% secure - I lost a whole stack once when a disk failed, the hot spare cut in, and failed instantly. A third disk went down before I could get to it with a hot plug spare. It later turned out there was a fault in a batch of disks. (Fortunately this was such a critical system that I was running an entire mirrored server with it's own RAID stack, and the users never noticed a thing).

Well I keep hearing people say that when 1 disk fails...you loose everything. Well how often do disks fail? I've had about 10 HDDs over a period of time and the only one that has failed was a 20GB maxtor drive, and it didn't really fail but that was like 5 years before that happened. Also, if I read that correct that would mean I would have to reformat my 2 HDDs to setup an array? Is this the reason windows would fail to load when I tried to install the RAID drivers?
AMD Athlon 64 3300+
512 MB DDR SDRAM
ATI RADEON 9700 Pro
Samsung 160GB HDD
Windows XP Home Edition

It hard to determine exactly why the thing didnt work etc...
But if you have any data on eather of the drives it needs to be removed, the partitons need to be removed, also.
The 2 drives need to be the same type and size ( how ever if one is larger than the other when you set up the raid array the size of the larger drive will be made the same size as the smaller drive of the 2, so you would loose capacity ).
When the drives are both empty and no partitions on them, connect them to the raid controller you are going to use, etaher the nforce3 controller or a Sillicon image (IN YOUR CASE ITS THE PROMISE PDC )controller the choice is yours...
The drivers for each controller are very different so you will need to use the correct ones.
For your board I would use the Promise controller for the 2 drives on raid, and leave the Nforce controller as a normal SATA, this wil allow you to add extra SATA drives on the Nforce controller if you so wish..But they will not be part of the raid array...that measn they can be removed or added at any time...
I hope that answers your question.
Regards
IF IT AINT BROKE, DONT FIX IT
A8N-SLI Deluxe
AMD X64 3500+ Wnchst
Corsair 2x512 DDR400 Dual Channel
GV-NX6600128D PCIX Graphics Card
Ggbyte GT Pro CPU Cooler
Zalman VF700-CU VGA Cool

![]() |
![]() |
![]() |

This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.
| Ads by Google |