Computer Problems? Computing.Net has over 1,000,000 posts about all things technology related! Over 90% answered within 24 hours! Click here to start participating now! Also, be sure to check out the New User Guide.
RAID 0+1 vs. RAID 10
Name: Sandor (by prdsknoll) Date: April 27, 2007 at 08:36:08 Pacific OS: Win XP Pro / SP2 CPU/Ram: Pentium 4 3.6 GHz 2 GB Product: Home made
Comment:
Can anyone explain or point me to a good link or links for the differences, setups and benefits of RAID 0+1 vs. RAID 10?
the definations of each are pretty simple to understand. RAID 0+1 is a RAID 0 striped array with a single disk redundancy. RAID 10 is the same as RAID 0+1 except the redundancy is via a mirrored array. The advantage of RAID 10 is better data protection because the redundancy is Mirrored which at least doubles the redundancy. The disadvantage is that RAID 10 requires a minimum of 4 disks. Setup is dependant on the ability of the MBoard to support each type.
Summary: Stephen - Question #1 Your hard drive access will be faster, but because IDE RAID arrays are dependent upon your CPU, I'd strongly recommend a VERY fast CPU to ensure performance. If you have 2 arra...
Summary: Raid 0+1 requires a minimum of 4 drives. For best result they need to be identical in size and peformance. I have seen benchmarks that indicate that Raid 0+1 is generally slower than Raid 0 except for...
Summary: hi, i am stuck and am about to get fired. pls help. i have 2 hard disks on DL380; bot configured as raid 0. is it possible to convert it to raid 0+1 w/o losing data? also, it hosts OS boot files. pls ...
Name: Sandor (by prdsknoll)
0 
geforce 7600gs dual monit...
