| Computing.Net: Over 1,000,000 posts about all things technology related! Over 90% answered within 24 hours! Click here to sign up now, it's free! |
Quad Processor Vs Ram
|
Original Message
|
Name: minzin
Date: September 7, 2008 at 06:05:14 Pacific
Subject: Quad Processor Vs RamOS: Vista & XPCPU/Ram: 504 MB RAMManufacturer/Model: HP |
Comment: Hi there fellas, I'm thinking of buying HP Vista 64bit computer with following features. My plan is to install XP 32bit after Partitioning the harddrive. What should I choose from the following two? Intel Core 2 Quad Q6700 6GB of DDR2 memory Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300 4GB DDR2 memory One has greater memory & the other high processor. Thanks! Cheers!
Report Offensive Message For Removal
|
|
Response Number 1
|
Name: larryf215
Date: September 7, 2008 at 06:33:45 Pacific
|
Reply: (edit) I would go with the better processor. Memory is cheaper and easier to install. How much is 2gb of DDR2? about $25. That is if there is available slots to install it and, the machine will accept it. larry
Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal
|
|
Response Number 2
|
Name: jam
Date: September 7, 2008 at 06:51:17 Pacific
|
Reply: (edit)4GB RAM is the limit for any 32-bit OS. The Quad is definitely the better CPU. How much of a price difference between the two systems? "If my answers frighten you then you should cease asking scary questions" - Jules Winnfield (Samuel L. Jackson) in Pulp Fiction
Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal
|
|
Response Number 3
|
Name: StuartS
Date: September 7, 2008 at 06:52:19 Pacific
|
Reply: (edit)If you are going to install Windows 32bit 6Gbs of memory is a waste if time as you will only be able to use a little over half of it. Stuart
Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal
|
|
Response Number 4
|
Name: minzin
Date: September 7, 2008 at 07:07:07 Pacific
|
Reply: (edit)Hi Jam, '4GB RAM is the limit for any 32-bit OS.' ---------------------- I'll be using both OS (V&X)Choosing 4GB will benefit running XP, isn't it? Hi Stuart, 'If you are going to install Windows 32bit 6Gbs of memory is a waste if time as you will only be able to use a little over half of it.' ---------------------- I dont mind if XP will use lil over half of it. (since I have Vista on the other hand) My concern is Will 6GB slow XP OS? Thanks!
Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal
|
|
Response Number 6
|
Name: jefro
Date: September 7, 2008 at 15:38:18 Pacific
|
Reply: (edit)You should run perfmon now on the things you use. Personally I prefer more and faster ram. I'd install a virtual machine instead of a partition. What would be the use for the xp? As above the ram as ram is useless unless you apply a ram drive. Then things speed up a bunch. Your motherboard chipset may also have to be properly selected. "Best Practices", Event viewer, host file, perfmon, antivirus, anti-spyware, Live CD's, backups, are in my top 10
Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal
|
|
Response Number 7
|
|
Reply: (edit)Well according to my point of view its best to go with the higher processor the reason is most large applications will need a strong processor to run and ram will only help u in temporarily saving what ever current job your doing, but when the current job ur doing crosses the limit of 4GB then what ever oppened applications Idel will get transfered to a virtual memory in the harddisk until its being called again thats where u will have a slight delay in the performance. but with the OS u will be using the maximum limit is 4GB Ram. Its best you go with the higer Processor.
Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal
|

Post Locked
This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.
Go to General Hardware Forum Home