Computing.Net > Forums > General Hardware > PS/2 or USB?

Computing.Net: Over 1,000,000 posts about all things technology related! Over 90% answered within 24 hours! Click here to sign up now, it's free!

PS/2 or USB?

Reply to Message Icon

Original Message
Name: Timurich
Date: November 5, 2004 at 20:46:22 Pacific
Subject: PS/2 or USB?
OS: WinXP pro
CPU/Ram: Intel 3.0Gh/1Gb
Comment:

Hello All!

I just purchased Razor Viper mouse.
It only has a USB connector.
Does it mean that USB is better and faster than PS/2 connection, concidering that Razor Viper is one of the fastest and precise optical mice out there (50 bucks too)?
I wonder whether I should buy USB-PS/2 adopter. I do have plenty of USB ports tho.
Please advise.
Thank you!


Report Offensive Message For Removal


Response Number 1
Name: ddp59
Date: November 5, 2004 at 20:52:33 Pacific
Reply: (edit)

try it in safe mode in windows, if mouse works in safe mode than you are okay, if mouse not work in safe mode get adapter as you never know when you might have to be in safe mode for some reason

david


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 2
Name: Timurich
Date: November 5, 2004 at 21:42:55 Pacific
Reply: (edit)

Good point!
Thank you!

I am going to keep my old PS/2 mouse near by just in case. I suppose USB is not going to work in DOS either.

I still wonder if USB mouse connection has benefits over PS/2 mouse connection..


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 3
Name: Mattwizz3 (by mattwizz3)
Date: November 6, 2004 at 01:20:44 Pacific
Reply: (edit)

I baught a Microsoft optical mouse that was USB and came with a USB-PS/2 adapter. when I use the adapter there is no difference in the way it works at all. I dont know why they have started makeing them USB I dont think there is any performance boost.

Mattwizz3 : )

AMD K-7 600MHz & Asus K7v
256Mb SDRAM
80Gb WDC, 8Mb Buffer
128Mb ASUS Radeon A9550
Cyber Drive CD-RW DVD Combo


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 4
Name: JackG
Date: November 6, 2004 at 01:57:04 Pacific
Reply: (edit)

The whole idea of the USB mouse was to reduce the number of cables plugged into the back of your system and so that they could be longer. (Hum.. so they can be plugged into the front?) The theory Micro$oft pushed was that you would have one USB cable out the back to the USB keyboard, and one out of the keyboard to the mouse, and one out of the mouse (oops! can't move the mouse with two cables). OK, one out of the keyboard to the USB ZIP drive and then one to the mouse.

Of course no one wanted the expense and problems of putting the repeater hardware in "their" attachment to allow the daisy chaining of USB devices....

Of course when you try to run all of those devices through one connection, they take too much power and you need a powered USP splitter, which adds another power cable....

The only advantage of USB keyboards or mice (other than marketing cool) is you can use longer cables. The data rate from such devices is way slow and a faster interface buys you nothing.

And of course USB keyboards and mice don't usually work in DOS unless the BIOS supports them.


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 5
Name: neotms88
Date: November 7, 2004 at 11:42:52 Pacific
Reply: (edit)

About USB in DOS, I rember seeing a USB 2.0 driver for MS-DOS 6.22, I am pretty shure that you can use USB Mice in DOS, but not keyboards, unless the BIOS Supports it. (The driver even supports flash drives.)


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal







Post Locked

This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.


Go to General Hardware Forum Home








Do you have a Desktop Computer anymore?

No
Yes, but only at work
Yes, but its rarely used
Yes, and its a workhorse


View Results

Poll Finishes Today.
Discuss in The Lounge
Poll History




Data Recovery Software