Tom's Guide | Tom's Hardware | Tom's Games
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
My question is, the 450W has less amperage on 2 of the big rails.
SO how does a 350W PS have more amp than the 450W?
http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductCompare.asp?CompareItemList=N82E16817181102%2CN82E16817704002&SubCategory=58

Yeah, it looks like they have either the rated wattage or the amperage output wrong on the 350 watt.
The output wattage is approximately equal to the sum of the various volt x amp products. (Approximately because the output isn't a pure DC wave.) That puts the wattage of the alleged 350 PS at around 480 watts. The same formula for the 450 PS comes to about 455 watts.
So unless I'm missing something, the 350 PS figures are wrong.

"Approximately because the output isn't a pure DC wave."
DC doesn't produce a wave.
Not trying to be a wise guy, could you elaborate on what you mean?
Just curious thanks
As DAVEINCAPS stated, sounds like a typo to me too.

It's not necessarily a typo. A power supply can be rated at 350W even though the sum of all the volts*amps is greater. What it means is that each voltage has a maximum amperage it can supply but the maximum power you can extract at any time is 350W. So you might have 5V/50A and 12V/20A which gives a total of 490W but on a 350W supply you can take the 50A at 5V but only 8.25A at 12V (or any other combination).
As for the "DC wave", there ain't no such thing. The DC is fully stabilised. I think what Dave is trying to say is that the power supply is a switching type, which means that it oscillates at a high frequency in order to reduce the size of the transformer. The waveform generated by the switcher isn't a pure sine wave, but that doesn't matter as it's rectified and stabilised and comes out as pure unvarying DC.
Bryan
Bryan

I have looked around for tyring to calc the wattage of PS's based on volt/amp ratings on the dc rails.
if you do the standard V * A = watts.
it never agrees.
could you show this calculation?

Here's a clip & below it is the site that I took it from...a lot of good info in the article so it's worth the time to read:
"Typically ATX power supplies are rated with a maximum wattage for the +3.3 and +5 line combined meaning that the total of both, no matter the ratio, cannot exceed the designated rating. This is an extremely important number to note when looking at power supplies. A manufacturer may even combine the +3.3, +5 and +12 line and provide a maximum wattage rating but this is not as common."
http://www.short-media.com/review.php?r=133
ASUS A7N8X-X
Athlon XP 1800+
8.5 x 200MHz
1024MB PC3200 2.5-3-3-7
Asus A9550GE/TD 128MB
WinME/WinXP Pro SP1

...because they are both CHEAP power supplies - spend a little more money and get a better one.
Rule #1: Good Computers don't go down.
Rule #2: There is no such thing as a good computer.

I know this McNabb, i would never buy either of these 2. its just that I see this kinda thing at the 75$ level PS as well and was wondering wtf?

There is no official standard for reporting PSU wattage...manufacturer's are free to use whatever "tactic" they like. I suggest you read that article
ASUS A7N8X-X
Athlon XP 1800+
8.5 x 200MHz
1024MB PC3200 2.5-3-3-7
Asus A9550GE/TD 128MB
WinME/WinXP Pro SP1

The power supply takes an AC sine wave and does its best to give a DC output. ('Wave' is just what came to mind first). The electronics of the PS will rectify the wave--either attenuate the negative portion for a half-wave recification or flip it over for a full-wave. I found this page that shows those basic wave forms.
Then it tries to square off the wave to approximate pure DC where the wave form is just a horizontal line. But it's never going to be perfect. There's always going to be some time varying elements. If you connect a meter to the power supply outputs and test both AC and DC voltage you should get near the rated DC voltage and also a slight AC voltage.
With DC, power is simple--volts x amps. Anything else isn't as easy. Do we need to consider reactive power? With non-DC power it's not enough to call it just 'watts' without some kind of further explanation.
Of the power supply labels I've bothered to check, the sum of the volt-amp products has always been close to the rated power. But as jam points out, there's apparently no testing standard.

![]() |
LCD Monitors
|
Home Setups - Curious
|

This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.
| Ads by Google |