Computing.Net > Forums > General Hardware > Parallel vs Usb for printer

Computer Problems? Computing.Net has over 1,000,000 posts about all things technology related! Over 90% answered within 24 hours! Click here to start participating now! Also, be sure to check out the New User Guide.

Parallel vs Usb for printer

Reply to Message Icon

Name: bluejay
Date: February 18, 2008 at 13:26:28 Pacific
OS: Windows XP Home SP1
CPU/Ram: P4 1.5ghz 256 ram
Product: Gateway
Comment:

Is there an advantage of one over the other to connect a printer using parallel or usb? Mine supports both. Bluejay



Sponsored Link
Ads by Google

Response Number 1
Name: citylawyer
Date: February 18, 2008 at 13:41:31 Pacific
Reply:

usb is faster


0

Response Number 2
Name: bluejay
Date: February 18, 2008 at 13:51:12 Pacific
Reply:

Thanks, That's how I have it hooked up. It is an older printer that I had at home and I brought it to work to use after my other one bit the dust,and until the one I want is back in stock . That's when I noticed it supported both connections. Learn something every day here. Bluejay


0

Response Number 3
Name: DAVEINCAPS
Date: February 18, 2008 at 16:48:21 Pacific
Reply:

I doubt you would notice any difference in speed. The bottleneck in printer speed is the printer itself and not the way it receives the data.

But USB is probably going to be easier to set up. Also, with nothing hooked up to the parallel port you can disable it in cmos/bios setup and free up those resources.


0

Response Number 4
Name: aegis
Date: February 18, 2008 at 17:31:12 Pacific
Reply:

Yup, as far as speed is concerned, there wouldn't be any difference. Printers are incredibly slow.


0

Response Number 5
Name: Bill McMinn
Date: February 19, 2008 at 21:46:33 Pacific
Reply:

Using parallel to connect a printer keeps a USB port free for another device.


0

Related Posts

See More



Response Number 6
Name: chrisman7 (by chrisman.7)
Date: February 19, 2008 at 22:25:05 Pacific
Reply:

bill said
Using parallel to connect a printer keeps a USB port free for another device.

thats why in theory with the aid of usb hubs usb supports up to 137 devices


0

Response Number 7
Name: DAVEINCAPS
Date: February 20, 2008 at 00:18:49 Pacific
Reply:

It's not like there need be any shortage of USB ports. If you need more yeah, add a hub or at least another card. It's easier for windows to work with multiple USB devices than multiple parallel devices. That's why I think being able to disable the parallel port is more helpful.
For example, it's usually easier to set up a sound card when the parallel port is disabled.



0

Sponsored Link
Ads by Google
Reply to Message Icon






Post Locked

This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.


Go to General Hardware Forum Home


Sponsored links

Ads by Google


Results for: Parallel vs Usb for printer

Parallel to USB printer cable www.computing.net/answers/hardware/parallel-to-usb-printer-cable/59527.html

parallel to usb cable www.computing.net/answers/hardware/parallel-to-usb-cable/31181.html

Parallel to USB Scanner Issue www.computing.net/answers/hardware/parallel-to-usb-scanner-issue/50065.html