Computing.Net > Forums > General Hardware > Parallel vs Usb for printer

Parallel vs Usb for printer

Reply to Message Icon

Original Message
Name: bluejay
Date: February 18, 2008 at 13:26:28 Pacific
Subject: Parallel vs Usb for printer
OS: Windows XP Home SP1
CPU/Ram: P4 1.5ghz 256 ram
Model/Manufacturer: Gateway
Comment:

Is there an advantage of one over the other to connect a printer using parallel or usb? Mine supports both. Bluejay


Report Offensive Message For Removal


Response Number 1
Name: citylawyer
Date: February 18, 2008 at 13:41:31 Pacific
Reply: (edit)

usb is faster


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 2
Name: bluejay
Date: February 18, 2008 at 13:51:12 Pacific
Reply: (edit)

Thanks, That's how I have it hooked up. It is an older printer that I had at home and I brought it to work to use after my other one bit the dust,and until the one I want is back in stock . That's when I noticed it supported both connections. Learn something every day here. Bluejay


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 3
Name: DAVEINCAPS
Date: February 18, 2008 at 16:48:21 Pacific
Reply: (edit)

I doubt you would notice any difference in speed. The bottleneck in printer speed is the printer itself and not the way it receives the data.

But USB is probably going to be easier to set up. Also, with nothing hooked up to the parallel port you can disable it in cmos/bios setup and free up those resources.


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 4
Name: aegis
Date: February 18, 2008 at 17:31:12 Pacific
Reply: (edit)

Yup, as far as speed is concerned, there wouldn't be any difference. Printers are incredibly slow.


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 5
Name: Bill McMinn
Date: February 19, 2008 at 21:46:33 Pacific
Reply: (edit)

Using parallel to connect a printer keeps a USB port free for another device.


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal


Response Number 6
Name: chrisman7 (by chrisman.7)
Date: February 19, 2008 at 22:25:05 Pacific
Reply: (edit)

bill said
Using parallel to connect a printer keeps a USB port free for another device.

thats why in theory with the aid of usb hubs usb supports up to 137 devices


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 7
Name: DAVEINCAPS
Date: February 20, 2008 at 00:18:49 Pacific
Reply: (edit)

It's not like there need be any shortage of USB ports. If you need more yeah, add a hub or at least another card. It's easier for windows to work with multiple USB devices than multiple parallel devices. That's why I think being able to disable the parallel port is more helpful.
For example, it's usually easier to set up a sound card when the parallel port is disabled.



Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal






Use following form to reply to current message:

   Name: From My Computing.Net Settings
 E-Mail: From My Computing.Net Settings

Subject: Parallel vs Usb for printer

Comments:

 


  Homepage URL (*): 
Homepage Title (*): 
         Image URL: 
 
Data Recovery Software




Have you ever used OpenOffice?

Yes, as my main suite.
Yes, occationally.
Yes, but only once.
No, never.


View Results

Poll Finishes In 6 Days.
Discuss in The Lounge