Computing.Net > Forums > General Hardware > Onboard sound vs pci sound

Onboard sound vs pci sound

Reply to Message Icon

Original Message
Name: ledge2edge
Date: October 14, 2007 at 09:15:52 Pacific
Subject: Onboard sound vs pci sound
OS: Vista Ultimate
CPU/Ram: Opteron 185, 2Gb DDR 500
Model/Manufacturer: Custom Build
Comment:

Now this is something i have been wondering for a while, now when someone were to run onboard sound it uses the cpu in conjunction to help produce your sound correct?
But bottom line is, is it beeter to run a pci2.1 sound card or just use the onboard audio?

Opteron185@2.9Ghz-8600Gts 512mb SLI-2xRaptor Raid0- 2Gbs DDR500- Asus An8 SLI Deluxe


Report Offensive Message For Removal


Response Number 1
Name: OtheHill
Date: October 14, 2007 at 09:45:52 Pacific
Reply: (edit)

There is no one size fits all. I am not a game player so I use intergated HD sound that sounds great and was totally free. If the use of the onboard was interfearing with game playing then one might consider using an add in card. If I felt a need for an add in card I would look for a PCIe based card, if they are available yet. I do think that for the most part what you have heard about sound cards is based on the experiences of the gaming community at large. There are two facets to this. One is the CPU cycles, which may lower the frame rates at which a game may play but I don't think in reality you need 100 FPS anyway. The second is probably more legitimate. That is, Creative labs sound cards are the defacto standard for the special effects that can be used when playing games. If you want or need those effects I don't think you have no choice but to use a Creative add in card.

One last point. All sound uses some CPU cycles. The pci bus is still dependent on the processor to some degree. It is a matter of what degree the processor is used. If you can perform whatever tasks you need to while using CPU cycles for sound, what harm is there in that. You just need lots of horsepower, which all modern processors now have.


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 2
Name: jam
Date: October 14, 2007 at 09:52:37 Pacific
Reply: (edit)

While it's true that onboard sound does use some CPU cycles, the performance hit is very minimal, especially considering the speed of today's CPUs. Onboard sound has gotten quite good too so there's very little need to move to a dedicated soundcard, unless you're a true audiophile or need specific features not offered by the onboard.


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 3
Name: Outlander
Date: October 18, 2007 at 06:58:39 Pacific
Reply: (edit)

Onboard sound chips usually are tied into a PCI channel, like using a PCI sound card, only it's soldered to the motherboard.

The quality all depends on the amount of detail put into the design of the motherboard. If it's designed well, there should be no or little static, feedback, and electronic noise. I have seen really crappy built in audio hardware.

Also who made the sound hardware? some knock off AC'97 no name compliant chipset, or someone decent? I tend to think CMI chipsets suck as an example.

Last is the drivers. Have heard echoing, skipping, slowdowns, and jidder all from crappy drivers.

In the end, if you want to be sure, you may want to go with a ceative labs sound card, or similar name brand known for audio quality.

Core2 Duo 1.86
2GB DDR2 667
Nvidia 6800GS
Asus P5L-MX


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal







Use following form to reply to current message:

   Name: From My Computing.Net Settings
 E-Mail: From My Computing.Net Settings

Subject: Onboard sound vs pci sound

Comments:

 


  Homepage URL (*): 
Homepage Title (*): 
         Image URL: 
 
Data Recovery Software




Have you ever used OpenOffice?

Yes, as my main suite.
Yes, occationally.
Yes, but only once.
No, never.


View Results

Poll Finishes In 5 Days.
Discuss in The Lounge