Computing.Net > Forums > General Hardware > Maxtor Vs. Seagate

Computer Problems? Computing.Net has over 1,000,000 posts about all things technology related! Over 90% answered within 24 hours! Click here to start participating now! Also, be sure to check out the New User Guide.

Maxtor Vs. Seagate

Reply to Message Icon

Name: tacubaya
Date: July 3, 2005 at 20:37:02 Pacific
OS: Windows XP SP2
CPU/Ram: Intel P4 1.6GHz, 256 Ram
Comment:

Hi, in a few days i will buy a new 120GB hard drive, but i cant decide between Maxtor and Seagate. After a lot of reading in several sites, i've seen Maxtor benchmarks are much better and its performace is quite good. In the other side, Seagate hard drives are very reliable and quiet.

I'm planning on buying it on Houston and bring ing it back to Mexico City.

What should i but in means of your personal experience?

Thanks



Sponsored Link
Ads by Google

Response Number 1
Name: CB33
Date: July 3, 2005 at 22:28:46 Pacific
Reply:

my maxtor 4r120lo is great, cant compare it to a seagate since i dont own one though...


0

Response Number 2
Name: NAN
Date: July 3, 2005 at 23:02:23 Pacific
Reply:

Maxtor has been good for me, so is seagate and WD.
---> go for the best price.


0

Response Number 3
Name: Mechanix2Go
Date: July 3, 2005 at 23:38:44 Pacific
Reply:

Both have been good for me.

I would go for the reliability, especially since you're taking it far from place of purchase.

A slight edge on performance will be little comfort if it quits rematurely. Same goes for price.

M2


If at first you don't succeed, you're about average.


0

Response Number 4
Name: ghimpe--
Date: July 4, 2005 at 00:35:14 Pacific
Reply:

I have a Seagate 120Gb PATA HDD and it's quiet, fast and reliable (so far). I have it for a year or so...


0

Response Number 5
Name: jam
Date: July 4, 2005 at 06:36:05 Pacific
Reply:

I vote for Western Digital

Asus A7N8X-X
1800+ @ 8.5 x 200MHz
768MB PC3200 2.5-3-3-7
Asus A9550GE/TD 128MB
WinME/WinXP Pro


0

Related Posts

See More



Response Number 6
Name: Rich Mentzel
Date: July 4, 2005 at 06:39:51 Pacific
Reply:

I vote for WD # 1 Seagate # 2 and would pass on Maxtor all together lumping it with Hitachi as "highly suspect".
Way too many failure problems in the past recent years, used to be another story.
After Maxtor bought Quantum, reliability went out the window.


0

Response Number 7
Name: Rich Mentzel
Date: July 4, 2005 at 06:41:07 Pacific
Reply:

I vote for WD # 1 Seagate # 2 and would pass on Maxtor all together lumping it with Hitachi as "highly suspect".
Way too many failure problems in the past recent years, used to be another story.
After Maxtor bought Quantum, reliability went out the window.
Friday night Jim Cramer was asked the same question about buying Maxtor stock on "Mad Money" and he even said what Jam and I just did, for the saqme reasons!


0

Response Number 8
Name: jam
Date: July 4, 2005 at 09:23:00 Pacific
Reply:

I didn't give any reasons (at least not in this specific thread) but for the most part, I agree with Rich.

I have no experience with Seagate other than replacing bad ones for other people. I have a stack of them (mostly older) in my basement, but there are a couple of 40GB Barracudas.

I've only used one Maxtor HDD in any of my personal rigs & had no probs with it. I did have a Quantum BigFoot fail on me many years ago & I have several bad Quantum HDDs in my basement as well (some have Maxtor labels but are actually Quantum drives). As far as I'm concerned, buying Quantum was a bad move for Maxtor & I've avoided them ever since.

I run Western Digital almost exclusively & have never had any problems with them. I have replaced a few bad ones for other people though. No HDD manufacturer is immune to failures...

http://www.computing.net/hardware/wwwboard/forum/35929.html

Asus A7N8X-X
1800+ @ 8.5 x 200MHz
768MB PC3200 2.5-3-3-7
Asus A9550GE/TD 128MB
WinME/WinXP Pro


0

Response Number 9
Name: ghimpe--
Date: July 4, 2005 at 11:01:51 Pacific
Reply:

Well, i've had a 40GB Wester Digital fail but i use a 8.4Gb Quantum Fireball since '99 and i'm still storing on it all my important files, it's true it's noizy and a bit slow for nowdays but i consider it to be the most reliable hdd in my system (along a WD and a Seagate)

Never used Maxtor but i've heard bad reviews about it...


0

Response Number 10
Name: tacubaya
Date: July 4, 2005 at 12:04:46 Pacific
Reply:

Thanks for all your replies, the Maxtor and the Seagate are at the same price ($99) so i have no problems with its price.


0

Response Number 11
Name: tropic
Date: July 4, 2005 at 14:02:15 Pacific
Reply:

@ Jam

Haha! I missed your Tommy Boy reference before.

@ tacubaya

Buy whatever you want. Run it long enough, and it's going to fail, period. Most sys. builders I know have a brand they will never buy again (mine is Maxtor)--it's funny how these guys all hate a single, different brand. I think they all suck equally.

"If it ain't broke, upgrade anyway."


0

Response Number 12
Name: blueverine
Date: July 5, 2005 at 18:36:01 Pacific
Reply:

I had a Maxtor HDD for five years and it was super noisy. Now I have WD and Seagate drives. They are very quiet.


0

Response Number 13
Name: Mr2001
Date: July 6, 2005 at 20:37:37 Pacific
Reply:

I've just had three Maxtor drives fail in a row: I bought a 200 GB drive, which failed after a couple months. I RMA'd it and they sent an identical replacement, which lasted less than a month before crashing *hard*. I RMA'd that one and they sent a 250, which lasted for about 8 months, then died today. It's not covered under warranty anymore, so I bought a Seagate instead.

Don't waste your money on Maxtor. Seagate has a much longer warranty period now too - 5 years instead of Maxtor's 1 year.


0

Response Number 14
Name: MrN0iTaLL
Date: July 8, 2005 at 13:50:10 Pacific
Reply:

Excuse me but ...... in europe, Maxtor provide either a 3 or 5 year warranty on drives. So. why did your warranty run out after just 1 year ?. I would suggest if Maxtor won't honour the replacement in the US then try running the RMA through the european server. I'm not promising you anything but on the whole IT Trade seems an awfull lot more freindly over here. (Even if the bombs are going off!)


0

Response Number 15
Name: Mr2001
Date: July 12, 2005 at 16:54:10 Pacific
Reply:

According to Maxtor's site (www.maxtor.com, click Warranty Services and then Warranty Periods), retail packaged ATA hard drive kits have a 1 year warranty in North America, 2 years in Europe/Middle East/Africa, and 1 year everywhere else. The Maxtor drives I saw at the store when I bought my Seagate also had 1 year warranties.

Every warranty status page I can find on there says my warranty ran out on 4/30/2005. They carried the warranty period over from when I bought the first drive, not when they shipped the replacement... so the replacement I got in October was only covered under warranty for 6 months! Even if there is a separate place where I can check my warranty according to Maxtor Europe (which I haven't found), I doubt they'd pay to ship a replacement from Europe to the US.


0

Response Number 16
Name: HaTcH
Date: July 13, 2005 at 18:21:45 Pacific
Reply:

Interestingly enough, I have had both Maxtor and WD drives fail, but I also am currently using both a Maxtor (c:) and a WD (d:) on this computer since 2002~3 with no problems at all. This leads me to assume that hard drive failures are usually caused by the user or something external (perhaps a power supply). Defects and such will happen but are equally as possible between any mfr. Like NAN said, go for the best price (and perhaps invest in one of those hard drive cooling do-hickies that attach to the bottom of the drive.

The 2 drives that failed:
WD24300 Caviar (~4.3gb). Now that was an old sucker, from 1998 and I noticed it starting to go cookoo (ticking and data corruption that spread on the disk) by around 2001~2002.

In a completely different system I had a Maxtor 94610U6 (~40gb) and that failed its SMART test and has all kinds of bad sectors and is completely unformatable. (tried it in with a unix fdisk) That one was made in 2000 and failed in '03 if I'm not mistaken.

HOWEVER I currently have no Seagate paper weights... coincidence or a testament to Seagate...


0

Response Number 17
Name: ludedude25
Date: July 16, 2005 at 08:01:50 Pacific
Reply:

This may sound completely odd but only failed drives i've replaced have been in pre manufactured pc's or completely old pentiums of the 1-4 gig era.

Compaq's with Segate 6-8 gig drives seemed to be constant replacements.

HP's with Quantum drives 6-10 gig drives- also a crapper.

I have a 30 gig maxtor drive I put in a custom build Linux box of mine that's still working after almost 3 years. It has previously rested in a few other pc's as well.

As for my favorite I choose Western Digital as I have 1 120gb, 3 80gigs, 2 40's, 15,10, and bunch of old 4,3,& 2gig drives.

If I had to choose between maxtor and segate i'd probably choose segate myself.

I also believe monthly scandisc's & defrags help maintain healthy hard drives.

Anyone had any experiences with the new 400 gig segate? Those look awfully tempting @ outpost.com !

ASUS A7V8X
Athlon XP 2700+ @ 2.17ghz
768MB DDR 2700
nVidia 128mb FX 5200
WD 80gb SE
NEC ND-3500AG DVD R/RW


0

Sponsored Link
Ads by Google
Reply to Message Icon






Post Locked

This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.


Go to General Hardware Forum Home


Sponsored links

Ads by Google


Results for: Maxtor Vs. Seagate

Maxtor vs Seagate vs W.D. www.computing.net/answers/hardware/maxtor-vs-seagate-vs-wd/9581.html

Maxtor and seagate. www.computing.net/answers/hardware/maxtor-and-seagate/16667.html

Maxtor or Western Digital? www.computing.net/answers/hardware/maxtor-or-western-digital/36520.html