A few hardware questions...first, the video card:I just got this new PC, and after playing around with it for a week or so, I've determined I need more graphics capability than I currently have.
The specs:
Windows Vista Home Premium
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4000+
ECS MCP61PM-HM Motherboard (2x PCI slots, one occupied, 1x PCI Express x16 slot, 1x PCI Express x1 slot)
2048 MB (2x 1 GB sticks) PC2-5300 RAM (almost certainly, since CAS latency is 5; board supports up to PC2-6400)
GeForce 6150SE/nForce 430 GPU (128 MB RAM)
HP F70 17" LCD flat panel monitor (15-pin VGA connector, max resolution 1280x1024)
1x S-ATA 320 GB HDD (3 Gb/s)
The budget: $130
Notes: Command and Conquer Generals suffers at any decent resolution. I'd like to be able to play, say, Flight Simulator X without being slideshow'd to death.
The questions: Shopping around, I'm seeing GDDR4 cards in my budget. So, 512 MB GDDR3 or 256 MB GDDR4? Also, I'd like DX10 support, because Vista is behaving so far and I don't want to anger the MS gods.
And about my processor:
My current CPU is an X2 4000+, and I was wondering if I could switch it out for another (say, an X2 4800+ Brisbane, perhaps even a 5400+) without doing anything drastic like getting a whole new motherboard. Would the performance gains between the listed processors be worth the cost, or should I overclock?
And finally, about memory:
I was pondering, also, a third GB stick of RAM: Vista is a bit of a hog, and I notice that games take up a chunk as well. Would I notice any gains in performance worthy of the expenditure, or would that money be better served going into the video card/processor coffers?
I know this is a lot of inquiring, so thanks for your opinions in advance.