Computing.Net > Forums > General Hardware > Celeron vs. Pentium

Computer Problems? Computing.Net has over 1,000,000 posts about all things technology related! Click here to start participating now! Also, check out the New User Guide.

Celeron vs. Pentium

Reply to Message Icon

Name: Jesse (by mooneyjess1999)
Date: January 3, 2004 at 22:18:42 Pacific
OS: Win XP
CPU/Ram: 233mhz/ 96mb of RAM
Comment:

My computer right now is getting pretty old (233mhz Pentium MMX) I am looking for an upgrade (a whole new computer). I am on a very tight budget for one, and ebay is not an option. I was looking at some today and I noticed that Intel Celeron computers are a lot less then Pentium 4 computers, is there a reason for this? I do not do much gaming on computers the most advanced I get is The Sims, or Sim City 3000. The reason why I say this because I heard from somebody that they are not good for gaming. So if somebody could tell me if there is something bad about Celrons, it would help me a lot before I got one. Also one last thing I would also like to know how a Intel Celron 2.5Ghz would compare to a 233mhz Pentium MMX?

Thank-You



Sponsored Link
Ads by Google

Response Number 1
Name: hwood
Date: January 3, 2004 at 22:39:01 Pacific
Reply:

Jesse:

Celeron's are Intel's "value line" of CPUs. A Pentium 4 2.5Ghz CPU(if they made one) would run applications faster than a Pentium 4 2.5Ghz Celeron. The Celerons only have 128meg onboard cache, while the regular Pentium 4's have 512meg of onboard cache. Four times as much. The Pentiun 4's also run at a faster FSB speed. These can make provide a big performance boost with CPU intensive applications.

You said you do not "do not do much gaming". Provided you also do not do much video editing, Video re-encoding or CAD stuff the celeron should be fine.

Any 2.5Ghz CPU would easily blow away a 233mhz Pentium.


0

Response Number 2
Name: SkipCox
Date: January 3, 2004 at 23:02:35 Pacific
Reply:


That 233 is good to keep as a back up or give away...I wouldn't hesitate to buy a cheap celeron in your situation. You can always do more next year but you really need something newer now.

Skip


0

Response Number 3
Name: Jimi_l
Date: January 4, 2004 at 02:28:39 Pacific
Reply:

I build 10 Celeron's to every 1 P4 machine because as you said "money's tight" for many folks.

In my opinion Celeron's are the best kept secret in computing. Even heavy gaming or office applications they stand right up with the big guys. In fact the last two machines I did were a Celeron 2.0 400FSB and a P4 2.6GHz 800FSB. The P4 had a fx5600 video card and the Celeron has an fx5200. Running Code of Duty side by side on each they were virtually identical.The same held true for DVD's.

As a system builder I can have my pick of the lot and I would own one in a minite.

Jimi_l

Microsoft OEM system builder #412085
Intel reseller # 10304445
Maxtor VIP Channel Partner # 138988
Western Digital Select Partner


0

Response Number 4
Name: jam
Date: January 4, 2004 at 08:19:22 Pacific
Reply:

No mention of an AMD XP system? If you're on a budget & want the most bang for your buck, AMD is the way to go...it'll outperform any Celery out there


0

Sponsored Link
Ads by Google
Reply to Message Icon

Related Posts

See More


Mouse driver Bios wont dectec but wind...



Post Locked

This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.


Go to General Hardware Forum Home


Sponsored links

Ads by Google


Results for: Celeron vs. Pentium

Celeron vs Pentium-advice needed www.computing.net/answers/hardware/celeron-vs-pentiumadvice-needed/33938.html

Centrino vs Pentium? www.computing.net/answers/hardware/centrino-vs-pentium/38799.html

AMD 1800+ vs. Pentium 4 1.8ghz www.computing.net/answers/hardware/amd-1800-vs-pentium-4-18ghz/18229.html