Computing.Net > Forums > General Hardware > best HD company

Computer Problems? Computing.Net has over 1,000,000 posts about all things technology related! Over 90% answered within 24 hours! Click here to start participating now! Also, be sure to check out the New User Guide.

best HD company

Reply to Message Icon

Name: aluminumriot
Date: July 25, 2004 at 21:57:00 Pacific
OS: Windows XP Pro 2600
CPU/Ram: AMD XP barton 3200\ Kings
Comment:

what is the best hard drive company.......its between maxtor and western digital.....i think its WD....what do u think.

AMD Athlon XP *barton* 3200+
Asus A7N8X-X
Kingston PC3200 512 DDR
ATI Radeon 9600SE
40 GIG Western Digital 7200 RPM
20 GIG Maxtor 5400 RPM
X-Dreamer II



Sponsored Link
Ads by Google

Response Number 1
Name: MrNiceGuy (by vng2k)
Date: July 25, 2004 at 22:19:13 Pacific
Reply:

Well, it is very hard to say but I think WD goes a bit ahead with the SATA Raptor which is not available in Maxtor. For the price and performance, I think they are all the same.


0

Response Number 2
Name: Symbios
Date: July 25, 2004 at 22:23:52 Pacific
Reply:

Seagate

Symbios


0

Response Number 3
Name: GerryC
Date: July 25, 2004 at 22:44:26 Pacific
Reply:

It is very difficult to say which is the best. I have used Maxtor drives for many years and never had any problems. I have been using two Maxtor 20 gig drives for about 3 years with any problems. I recently (about 4 months ago) bought a Western Digital 160 gig drive that "died" within two months. Their support was great, I received a replacement within a week. I would not hesitate to purchase either a Maxtor or Western Digital drive. I don't think that is any valid argument to say that one is better than the other.


0

Response Number 4
Name: Hooner
Date: July 26, 2004 at 02:22:22 Pacific
Reply:

Nobody mentions IBM/Hitachi? their Deskstar range are quiet, cool, and can beat some SATA drives for speed.

Some people are like Slinkies?, not really good for anything, but you still can't help but smile when you see one tumble down the stairs...


0

Response Number 5
Name: doc is back
Date: July 26, 2004 at 06:05:37 Pacific
Reply:

IBM sucks! I have seen numerous ibm drives fail. Best success myself between western digital and maxtor were the maxtor drives.

May God forgive, and bless the United States.


0

Related Posts

See More



Response Number 6
Name: XxxFrancisxxxUSA
Date: July 26, 2004 at 06:06:34 Pacific
Reply:

Seagate. My seagate is rock solid. I was led to believe Western Digital are trash.

I have had 3 Maxtors go bad in a row. All same model. all within 6 months. One DOA!!!

No coincidence their warrantee has gone from a four year to a one year I suppose?!?


0

Response Number 7
Name: doc is back
Date: July 26, 2004 at 06:11:32 Pacific
Reply:

Maybe honda and toyota should start making harddrives.

May God forgive, and bless the United States.


0

Response Number 8
Name: Hooner
Date: July 26, 2004 at 06:23:13 Pacific
Reply:

doc, HDDs go bad whatever make you buy, you've just been unlucky, as you can see from your recommendation of Maxtor and the following reply.

The fact remains that the Deskstar range are among the quietest and fastest available.

Some people are like Slinkies?, not really good for anything, but you still can't help but smile when you see one tumble down the stairs...


0

Response Number 9
Name: doc is back
Date: July 26, 2004 at 06:31:33 Pacific
Reply:

The original poster asked between maxtor and western digital and thats what I gave a answer too. I have used all of the above and am currently using two western digital sata raptor drives 10000 rpms in my own computer running a raid 0. I am a bit concerned though because every now and then I hear one of these drives chripping at bootup. They are about four months old and its a good thing they have a five year warranty because it appears I will be needing it soon. Nobody ever said there were harddrive made that did not fail. Thats understood. I only commented on my own experiances concerning maxtor, western digial and ibm drives.

May it be said when I die, He was a man of integrity.


0

Response Number 10
Name: steigrafx
Date: July 26, 2004 at 07:23:08 Pacific
Reply:

They're all about the same. And the IBM Deskstars -- also known as Deathstars -- are no longer made by IBM. They now have a terrific reputation.


0

Response Number 11
Name: johnoh
Date: July 26, 2004 at 07:56:56 Pacific
Reply:

IBM sold its hard drive division to hitachi and the plant and people went with it. There were a few terrible deskstar drives in the past and that's why they got a bad rep but their current drives are fine.

WD and Maxtor are the popular drives because they are somewhat cheaper than seagate because seagate commands a premium.

The main functional difference in today's drives is lifespan and that's tough to measure since it will be a while before these drives fail. My vote goes to seagate since they are the leaders in quietness and temperature and heat and noise are what kills drives over time.

All that said, those above who say they are all about the same make a fair statement.


0

Response Number 12
Name: StuartS
Date: July 26, 2004 at 10:38:30 Pacific
Reply:

I have been using Seagate drives since 40 Mbs was huge and have never had one fail on me. They have all been retired in perfect working order.

Seagate are reliable. Speed, quietness, temperature are all desirable, but reliability is essential.

Stuart


0

Response Number 13
Name: XxxFrancisxxxUSA
Date: July 26, 2004 at 11:38:38 Pacific
Reply:

I believ what Johnoh meant was heat is a contributing factor to failure as of course it affects ballbearing expansion/contraction and will lead to a quicker wearing of bearings, and no doubt other problems. Yes also a desirable thing but a reason to go for Seagates.


0

Response Number 14
Name: aluminumriot
Date: July 26, 2004 at 12:26:26 Pacific
Reply:

wow, i wasnt expecting so much debate. thanx guys.

AMD Athlon XP *barton* 3200+
Asus A7N8X-X
Kingston PC3200 512 DDR
ATI Radeon 9600SE
40 GIG Western Digital 7200 RPM
20 GIG Maxtor 5400 RPM
X-Dreamer II


0

Response Number 15
Name: johnoh
Date: July 26, 2004 at 12:53:37 Pacific
Reply:

"... quietness, temperature are all desirable, but reliability is essential."

"but" might be replaced with "and their resulting".

A product with motorized and/or moving parts that is quieter and cooler than its competition is going to be more reliable than its competition.


0

Response Number 16
Name: Chunko
Date: July 26, 2004 at 14:34:03 Pacific
Reply:

Whats with the new western digital hard drives and the locking/unlocking arm?
They make a click noise when started and then make a click noise when turned off.
I talked to a wd agent and they said it was normal and that its just the arm(sorry if thats not the correct term)locking on power off and unlocking when starting.
Seems to me this would lower life expectancy on the drive..Any thoughts?


0

Response Number 17
Name: doc is back
Date: July 26, 2004 at 14:39:54 Pacific
Reply:

Interesting, It is a clicking noise I am hearing when starting, but only sometimes. Never hear it on shutdown. I will have to check into it. Do you have any refferance websites about it?


May it be said when I die, He was a man of integrity.


0

Response Number 18
Name: Chunko
Date: July 26, 2004 at 15:00:26 Pacific
Reply:

I dont have any reference sites but I believe I did a google a while back and found some posts about it.
Yeah,thats odd how you dont get it on shut down or on all boots.
You may want to contact wd about it.I think they have have a toll free number,you'll need your serial number to get assistance.


0

Response Number 19
Name: johnoh
Date: July 26, 2004 at 15:04:29 Pacific
Reply:

All hard drives have read/write head parking, which puts the read/write head (which is at the end of the arm) on top of a part of the drive that is known as the landing area. You don't want the head resting on a data area since it may end up corrupting or injuring that part of the drive, so platters all have a landing area and the read/write head comes into contact with that part of the platter first before progressing smoothly over the bits of the data area. WD also has protective head parking which forces the head to the landing area even when you have a system freeze or abnormal shutdown.


0

Response Number 20
Name: SkipCox
Date: July 26, 2004 at 18:18:53 Pacific
Reply:

I've used Maxtor for years with zero problems. I also replace a lot of older WD and Seagate drives that have failed.

None of this means a Maxtor is better than the other brands...it's just what I see on the systems I work on. If a point of sale vendor signs up with WD to provide hdd's over a ten year period, they will have failures and they will also have long periods without any real failures.

My next hdd will be a Seagete or Hitachi or WD or Maxtor...

If one of my new drives should happen to die an untimely death, I'll just write it off to the luck of the draw and likely replace it with the same drive.

Skip


0

Response Number 21
Name: heropsycho
Date: July 27, 2004 at 02:05:54 Pacific
Reply:

I've got to throw a vote Hitachi's way right now. Seagate second fav.

I've seen too many WD and Maxtor bite the dust on customers' systems. I used to be a big Maxtor fan, but when the 30 gig drives were becoming the common size drives, Maxtor's quality suddenly tumbled.

The Hitachi nd Seagate drives now usually have 8.5ms seek times, which is tops among Serial ATA/IDE drives aside from the WD Raptors.

MCSE, MCSA Messaging, baby!


0

Response Number 22
Name: squirrel
Date: July 27, 2004 at 16:11:45 Pacific
Reply:

I have always been a WD man.
I tried a MAXTOR and its been great for me so far.
either 1 i think is a good choice.

I build System builder, i have built about 15 systems in the last year.
Every one of them has a WD in it. I have never had a prob yet.


Shuttle AK39N
512 Micron
AMD 2600 Barton core
40GB 7200 Maxtor
ATI 7200 radeon


0

Response Number 23
Name: ShaDavid
Date: July 28, 2004 at 08:36:53 Pacific
Reply:

I upkeep 30 PC's at work. I have always used Maxtor and have never had one go bad on me yet. I have replaced many Western Digitals with Maxtors.


0

Response Number 24
Name: giggles
Date: July 28, 2004 at 13:22:30 Pacific
Reply:

WD! best service, best reviews, best price
i have had IBM, Hitachi, Seagate, Maxtor, and WD hdds and it seems to me that WD is definetly the best, the maxtor went bad after four years and i have heard from a friend of mine at my local comp shop that they run hotter than any other drives and he's been in the business for over 20 years so i now believe that they are crap, the Hitachi is still going strong after being in a Mitac Minote 6133 forever and out of it into my desktop as a backup for a while, the IBM is still going strong too and its been in a P75 desktop for years probly 9 years. i have no problems with the Seagates, but the WD caviar 80gigs remain the best. They are the quietest and fastest hdds i have ever had and hey if a WD goes bad then their excellent customer service will replace it for you

but like Skip said it really is the luck of the draw, although if you want to increase your odds get a WD the corsair of hdds

^(',')]}~~~:]>


0

Response Number 25
Name: Bobthearch
Date: July 28, 2004 at 21:20:12 Pacific
Reply:

I've always had good luck with Seagate.

-Bob


0

Response Number 26
Name: giggles
Date: August 2, 2004 at 21:37:53 Pacific
Reply:

although the new hitachi sata drives are getting high praise especially in Maximum PC magazine if anyone's familiar with it

what is painfully obvious to one person might be just painful to the other


0

Response Number 27
Name: DocMemory
Date: August 6, 2004 at 01:04:40 Pacific
Reply:

I had a 3 gig Maxtor fail after 6 1/2 years as a C: drive then a 5 gig WD fail after 6 years as a D: drive in the same machine. I currently have 4 Seagates going in 2 different machines and 1 Maxtor in a 3rd machine. The Seagates are 20 gig (C:) and 2 40's (D:,E:) in one and an 80 (C:) in another. The 20 gig Seagate has been going since late 99 and the others added later. That machine is on virtually 24/7 and does a lot of downloading (over 14000 mp3s on it). The 80 doesn't do much work and is about 1 1/2 years old. The remaining Maxtor is in an old IBM 300 PL that dates from 98 and was salveged from an airline company so god knows the usage it got. Currently it is a dual boot machine with linux and XP partitions. I agree with those that say luck of the draw and can't complain about any of them though maybe the WD was the weakest of the bunch. Its your call.

"Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one less travelled by, And that has made all the difference." Frost


0

Response Number 28
Name: Andy11
Date: August 7, 2004 at 00:45:37 Pacific
Reply:

How about Tobisha? That's what I'm currently using on my new laptop - anyone had any experiences w/ Tobisha HD's? Good or bad? Lemme know!

Thanks. =)

-Andy


0

Response Number 29
Name: giggles
Date: August 7, 2004 at 08:52:58 Pacific
Reply:

i've never even heard of Tobisha

what is painfully obvious to one person might be just painful to the other


0

Response Number 30
Name: Symbios
Date: August 7, 2004 at 18:17:56 Pacific
Reply:

Wow! This thread is still alive?

Giggles, you've never heard of Toshiba!? What planet are you from? LOL

Andy, I have never used a Toshiba drive myself because they only make them for laptops and I don't have a laptop. But I've heard very good things about them.


Symbios


0

Response Number 31
Name: giggles
Date: August 7, 2004 at 18:24:56 Pacific
Reply:

yes Toshiba laptops are the creme of the crop but this Tobisha company...
lol

what is painfully obvious to one person might be just painful to the other


0

Sponsored Link
Ads by Google
Reply to Message Icon






Post Locked

This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.


Go to General Hardware Forum Home


Sponsored links

Ads by Google


Results for: best HD company

Best speaker company? www.computing.net/answers/hardware/best-speaker-company/38930.html

What is best HD and CD-Rom config? www.computing.net/answers/hardware/what-is-best-hd-and-cdrom-config/5188.html

Various Blue Screen Errors www.computing.net/answers/hardware/various-blue-screen-errors/18137.html