Tom's Guide | Tom's Hardware | Tom's Games
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
I Had A Advent 3209 But I Upgraded It It Has A ECS L4S5M Motherboard The Problem Is It Had A 40Gb HDD In Which I No Longer Have I Upgraded It To A 80Gb And Added A CD-RW So Now Their Is My HDD And ZIP On Secondary IDE And DVD-ROM AND CD-RW ON Master the problem is that the master ide doesn't work properly any more the name of the drive is garbled in the bios i have tried putting the hdd and zip on the master with the same result however when i then auto-detect the hdd it shows garbled but as 20gb all the cables are new there are no bent pins and i have just upgraded the bios and reset the cmos please help i manage to get windows xp on with just the dvd-rom and hdd on the secondary ide please help thanks in advanced
I Got A
Athlon 2200+
512MB PC133 SDRAM
80Gb Hard Drive
64MB Geforce 3 TI500
Syntax SV266A
2MBPS Broadband
Windows XP MCE 2005

Pairing up 2 optical drives on the same cable/channel sometimes causes weird things to happen.
I think I told you this in your other post...don't know if you tried it, but take out or disconnect 2 of the IDE devices. All you need is the HDD as primary master & one of the optical drives as the 2ndary master...hopefully this will autodetect correctly & allow you to install Windows. Temporarily unplug the ZIP drive & the other optical drive...you don't need them to install XP & one of them might be flakey.
When you do attempt to connect all 4, I suggest this config:
prim master = HDD
prim slave = DVD
2ndary master = CD burner
2ndary slave = ZIPMake sure your master/slave jumper settings are correct (some HDDs have a different setting for master/single or master w/slave) & NEVER use cable select.
ASUS A7N8X-X
Athlon XP 1800+
8.5 x 200MHz
1024MB PC3200 2.5-3-3-7
Asus A9550GE/TD 128MB
WinME/WinXP Pro SP1

Jam:
Not trying to argue, I just find this an interesting topic, and I see it come up so often.I know you always suggest, as you have here, to pair the optical drive with a hard drive. This may in fact be quite valid, although I have not seen a post where someone says, yes that cured the problem. But as so many don't give the courtesy of posting back, who knows. Or I simply missed it.
However, I've always felt that if this is indeed the best setup, the mfrs. would certainly know and recommend it, and I've yet to see one who does.
Yesterday I picked up a Mad Dog cdrom at CompUSA, since it comes out free after rebate. (Putting it in an old HP to yardsale) So this is fresh on my mind.
The install instructions state, and I quote verbatim:
NOTE: we strongly suggest you do not (underlined) set up your Lightening CD-ROM drive on the same IDE channel as your hard drive.
All my machines past and present, admittedly this is not a huge number, have been set up opposite to your recommendation and function perfectly.
I recall a post of yours indicating that your setup yields on the fly recording times twice as fast as my setup would.
I've Googled for an answer and checked various mfr. sites, no luck. Is there an authorative source (no offense to you intended) for this setup that you could recommend to me?
I'd really like to understand and change my set-up if there is in fact a great advantage in it, as you stated before.
Again, I'm not trying to argue or be discourteous to you in any way. Thanks.

Pardon the interuption, but I'd like to put in my two cents.
The reason for Jams suggested setup is to increase move/copy speed between drives. If the two drives are on different channels the speed is significantly increased.
"NOTE: we strongly suggest you do not (underlined) set up your Lightening CD-ROM drive on the same IDE channel as your hard drive"
That's to increase the speed between them. However if you also have a CD writer, you probably want to compromise and put the cdrom drive on the same channel as a hard drive and put the burner on the other channel. You will probably be transferring data between the hard drive and the writer more often than between the cdrom and hard drive.

The problem with the 80-wire cables is they're generally not long enough to reach from the HD to the cdrom. So if you have more than one cdrom device you either put them both on the secondary or add an ATA card. Whenever possible I slave the cdrom to the HD and put the burner or DVD by itself on the secondary.
It sounds like there's a hardware problem with the secondary controller that's not likely repairable.
You say you now have the HD on secondary and the cdroms on primary. Other than their IDs being garbled on the posting screen do the cdroms work OK? Since cdrom don't need to be specifically ID'd by the bios they may work OK there. If they do you can either leave them that way or buy an ATA card.
If they don't work it sounds like you have no choice but to add the card.

That last paragraph left a lot to be desired.
The bottom line is put the drives that you transfer data between more often on different channels.

Yes, I know that I've mentioned this many times before. I've provided links explaining my reasoning before too & many have backed me up.
The basic rule you have to realize when configuring devices is this:
Only one device can use an IDE channel at a time...simple as that.
So for example, if you have two optical drives (reader & writer) on the same cable/channel & burn "on the fly", there will be constant "wait-states". But if the drives are configured to transfer data from one channel to the other, both devices can do their thing simultaneously. That will cut down on the burn time, plus you'll be less likely to produce "coasters".
Actually, almost any configuration "should" work, but optimal data transfers will ALWAYS be from channel to channel, rather than between two devices on the same channel.
These two pages should help explain. There is a comment about pairing up HDDs & ATAPI devices that sort of goes against my recommendation...all I can say is I've never encountered any probs configuring devices the way I do, & I wouldn't make the recommendation if I thought it wouldn't work.
http://www.storagereview.com/guide2000/ref/hdd/if/ide/confPerformance.html
http://www.storagereview.com/guide2000/ref/hdd/if/ide/confRecommendations.html
ASUS A7N8X-X
Athlon XP 1800+
8.5 x 200MHz
1024MB PC3200 2.5-3-3-7
Asus A9550GE/TD 128MB
WinME/WinXP Pro SP1

About the cables not reaching...one way around that is to install the 2nd HDD in a 5.25" bay using a 5.25" to 3.5" adapter
ASUS A7N8X-X
Athlon XP 1800+
8.5 x 200MHz
1024MB PC3200 2.5-3-3-7
Asus A9550GE/TD 128MB
WinME/WinXP Pro SP1

What are you guys on about lol i tried all your suggestions look this is the simple thing the secondary ide works hdd and optical drives work together right and they are detected correctly in the bios and i can install windows if i have dvd-rom or cd-rw and hdd on secondary bus but if i put anything on the primary ide slot it get detected in the bios but the name of the device is garled up and the optical drives or hdd won't load/work properly also if you auto detect the hdd on the primary bus it is garled as reconisged as 20gb instead of 80gb i tried just the hdd and optical drive on the master and updated the bios it is annoying me now
I Got A
Athlon 2200+
512MB PC133 SDRAM
80Gb Hard Drive
64MB Geforce 3 TI500
Syntax SV266A
2MBPS Broadband
Windows XP MCE 2005

Geez...this aint friggin rocket science! If you're having trouble with all 4 drives at once, take some of them out & see if that helps. You haven't actually told us what different configurations you tried.
Take out the ZIP & DVD, install the HDD as primary master & the burner as the 2ndary master. Use master or slave jumper. If your HDD has a different jumper setting for master (single) or master (w/slave), make sure to use the correct setting. DO NOT use Cable Select - EVER!
Or better yet, try the HDD all by itself with NO other IDE devices connected to the board. If the drive is detected properly, one of the other devices is flakey & is screwing things up...if the primary detection is still "garbled", throw the board in the garbage or buy a ATA100 PCI controller card
ASUS A7N8X-X
Athlon XP 1800+
8.5 x 200MHz
1024MB PC3200 2.5-3-3-7
Asus A9550GE/TD 128MB
WinME/WinXP Pro SP1

Your subject is titled "Motherboard bad?" The answer is yes. Your description of the problem (see 37822 also)indicates that the primary IDE controller is not working right.
You either need a new motherboard or you need to install an IDE controller card.

![]() |
![]() |
![]() |

This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.
| Ads by Google |