Tom's Guide | Tom's Hardware | Tom's Games
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
I'm trying to decide between a new processor..
Athlon XP 2600+
P4 2.0
Celeron 2.7I've been hardcore Intel for years, and never tried AMD before.
Just seeing if there are any pros and cons between these 3 processors before I make any final decisions.
I would get something better.. but there is a budget.
Thanks in advance!
~Cis

Celeron is very slow compared to other 2. My opinion is the other 2 are comparable. But the P4 probably is faster. I have a 2600+ and I do video editing (have never been happier with the speed). Hope that helps
When all else fails beat the $%!* out of it!!!

stay away from celeron at all cost
just get the amd athlon xp 2600+, you will be pleased with the performance

I recommend you go with AMD...ofcourse this also means a new mainboard, memory and possibly HSF depending on your choice between retail or OEM.
Regarding the 2600+ there are 3 of them.
0. Athlon XP 2600+ 256KB L2 Cache 266MHz FSB
Tbred @ 2.13GHz (16.0x133MHz)1. Athlon XP 2600+ 256KB L2 Cache 333MHz FSB
Tbred @ 2.08Ghz (12.5x166Mhz)2. Athlon XP 2600+ 512KB L2 Cache 333MHz FSB
Barton @ 1.9GHz (11.5x166Mhz)The bold one is the most popular because of it's L2 cache and it's overclocking prowess. You should get a good board and some decent memory @ least PC3200 to go with it if you intend to overclock.
Goodluck.
____________________________
The greatest risk is not taking one

yeah...i would the the 2600+ remember...you can oc it to 3200+ speeds...i think...i know u can do it with a 2500+

I personally stay away from athlon. True, it does have Cache, but thats pretty much all it has. Now I dont know if they resolved this issue but at the time Athlon was lacking in multimedia. The result? Translating DVD format to mpeg. etc. the sound n video quality gets garbled...from personal experience...
I hope you make the right choice in the end and let us know the result

Between those three !!!
Go with the AMD Kayotic !!! those probs are long gone with amd.
I run Intel I admit but I will stack the AMD against it any time.
Johno !!!
Remeber the post about the 512 ram !! The question you asked about the perfomance figures. I did post you the answer the other day have you read it ?
Good luck have fun but the XP2600+ is the way to go.

Okay I see. The 256>512 % is so high that it must be for some specific test. I've done the 256?512 upgrade myself and recommend it but do not see how 30% could be true in overall terms.

![]() |
![]() |
![]() |

This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.
| Ads by Google |