I have looked at soem charts showing the top graphics cards playing some of the best games (graphics wise). My question is there where two games that where the most intense. Fear and Black and White 2. My question is wondering which one is more complex. Under fsaa x4 fear had more frames per second on everycard comapred to black and white. Even the gtx had frames around the 30's compared to fear. So is black and white 2 the best graphical game out there? And the website was xbitlabs.com

Not always! It depends upon the way in which the graphics are compressed/decompressed and how well the game was written.. For instance, on my (dated) system, Half-Life 2 has better graphics than Farcry, but Half-life 2 runs much more smoothly because it was coded more efficiently. AMD AthlonXP 2200+ Abit NF7-S v2.0 Geforce4 Ti4200 128mb 1GB Crucial PC2700 80GB & 120GB SATA HDD's SB Audigy2 ZS Enermax Noisetaker 485W

The most amazing visuals I've seen are those of QUAKE 4 in ultra quality. But this is very subjective. Many games have their individual amazing things. For example, Far cry landscapes look real good, but the animation is UGLY, as well as the fire. The quake4 engine is in my opinion unmatched in the use of lighting effects. F.e.a.r.'s graphics are amazing too, specially in particle effects and the overall "realistic" feeling of the experience. black and white 2 is not that impressive, the problem is that there are far too many things going on in that game at the same time. Too many things the card has to render, that's why is more heavy. Free