Computing.Net > Forums > PC Gaming > The Best Budget Video Cards

Computer Problems? Computing.Net has over 1,000,000 posts about all things technology related! Click here to start participating now! Also, check out the New User Guide.

The Best Budget Video Cards

Reply to Message Icon

Name: anoncompboy
Date: July 14, 2005 at 03:41:34 Pacific
OS: WinXP pro corporate sp2
CPU/Ram: amd 2800+ 512 pc3200
Comment:

This is a follow-up to a rather unsuccessful thread.

If you can save up some cash and buy that shiny $500 video card you've been itchin to get ever since it came out a month ago, thats great.

But 90% of consumers (non-quotable statistic) are either not gamers or not serious gamers playing the latest video-intensive games like Far Cry and Doom 3. They don't need the kind of performance that high-end cards offer. So, what would you consider the best budget video card ($50-$100)?

~matt
AMD athlon 2800+ Barton
512 pc3200
80gb SATA
ATI Radeon 9250



Sponsored Link
Ads by Google

Response Number 1
Name: jam14online
Date: July 14, 2005 at 04:02:37 Pacific
Reply:

I prefer NVIDIA over ATI due to better drivers, in my opinion. (Also: they realize that GNU/Linux exists.)

I think the best card in that price range would probably be an NVIDIA GeForce 6200 with 128 MB of video RAM.

James

Free PC Help forums


0

Response Number 2
Name: jam
Date: July 14, 2005 at 05:26:29 Pacific
Reply:

It depends on whether you're talking AGP or PCI-e.

AGP: Radeon 9600XT 128MB

PCI-e: Geforce 6200 128MB

Asus A7N8X-X
1800+ @ 8.5 x 200MHz
768MB PC3200 2.5-3-3-7
Asus A9550GE/TD 128MB
WinME/WinXP Pro


0

Response Number 3
Name: anoncompboy
Date: July 14, 2005 at 05:29:34 Pacific
Reply:

Either AGP or PCIx as long as they are budget-priced. Also Pricewatch prices would help.

~matt
Abit KV7-V
AMD athlon 2800+ Barton
512 pc3200
80gb SATA
ATI Radeon 9250


0

Response Number 4
Name: heropsycho2177
Date: July 14, 2005 at 05:53:04 Pacific
Reply:

I don't let price by itself determine what I buy. I look at price/performance combined.

Let me give you an example.

My last card that I bought was an Nvidia 6600GT PCI-e for my new motherboard. I spent $160 after rebate.

When I shopped, I looked at benchmarks, especially for games that I played, the tech behind the card that could mean better performance down the road, etc. Examining all this, I found that I could get a 6600 non GT for $20 less, an X600 for around $30 less, and all down the line. Each time I saved somewhere around $20-30, but I sacrificed quite a bit of performance each step. That simply means I'll be replacing the card sooner rather than later. Going up from the card, I could get a 6800 for $50 more, etc. Each time, I spent $50 or so more for marginally better performance. However, had there only been marginally better performance each time up from a $100 card, I'd have bought a $100 card. Had there been significant performance gains up to a $250 card, I'd have bought a $250 card.

My previous card was a 9800 pro. I spent $250 on it almost two years ago. It kicked butt then, and it still would have been a good card, but I needed something PCI-e. I ended up selling it for $100. Two years ago, you couldn't have even bought a 9600 Pro for $100, which means your frames per second on many games today would have probably been too slow today.

"But 90% of consumers (non-quotable statistic) are either not gamers or not serious gamers playing the latest video-intensive games like Far Cry and Doom 3."

90% of gamers aren't playing any particular title. And for those who aren't, it's often because they don't have the hardware to do so, but they'd like to. Wisely buying hardware at the right price/performance ratios while remembering you will eventually ALWAYS have to upgrade, so don't blow $600 on a graphics card, or nickle and dime yourself down to cards that will need replacing very soon (Radeon 9200 for example), that keeps your system able to play any game that comes out.

My recommendation right now in a sub $100 card would be a 9600 pro, but I would recommend a $145 6600GT instead.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16814130220

Why? 9600 Pro's are already starting to show their age in many games out there. They'll play everything out there, don't get me wrong, but you know they're gonna be pretty slow next year. The 6600GT on the other hand should be able to last you two years, and you get to enjoy higher res, image quality, etc. in the meantime.

"Pat Buchanan, Bob Novak, and G. Gordon Liddy don't like Mark Felt. Mark Felt is truly a great man."


0

Response Number 5
Name: anoncompboy
Date: July 14, 2005 at 06:26:19 Pacific
Reply:

Thanks psycho, im starting to see the benefit of buying a $100-$150 card. In fact my dad owns a r9800 pro, he got it w/ rebate for around 150. Your the first person ive met to recognize the performance/price ratio-ppl tend to scratch their heads at the thought of such logic.

~matt
Abit KV7-V
AMD athlon 2800+ Barton
512 pc3200
80gb SATA
ATI Radeon 9250


0

Related Posts

See More



Response Number 6
Name: heropsycho2177
Date: July 14, 2005 at 08:35:47 Pacific
Reply:

That's not true. Jam is very conscious of the price/performance ratio aspect of hardware purchasing. We don't necessarily see eye to eye on some things like which specific card is the best price/performance cards (he tends to favor $60-100 cards, while I tend to favor getting $100-200 cards), but we both agree $600 for a card is, as Scott McClellan said of Karl Rove being the person who leaked the identity of an undercover CIA operative for political payback, totally rediculous.

"Republicans in Congress are moving to ratify a constitutional amendment to ban flag burning, thus ending the Iraq insurgency."


0

Response Number 7
Name: anoncompboy
Date: July 14, 2005 at 08:47:55 Pacific
Reply:

ah yes, sorry jam, forgot about him. yes we forum-ed some in my first forum post ever where i got everyone po'ed (hey i was a noob to forums, what do u expect)

~matt
Abit KV7-V
AMD athlon 2800+ Barton
512 pc3200
80gb SATA
ATI Radeon 9250
_____
[=[_]=] ______
[+[_]+] > {+[__]+}


0

Response Number 8
Name: jam
Date: July 14, 2005 at 09:07:30 Pacific
Reply:

Thanks heropsycho. We do see eye to eye on a number of things though & I appreciate it when you back me up. And you are 100% correct, I do favor cards in the $100 or less range. I'm a very casual gamer. My daughter gave me DOOM3 for xmas & it probably took me a month to get thru it...I just pecked away, 30 min here, 60 min there. I doubt I'll play it again though. But I used to play Unreal Tournament all the time & Quake 3 Arena too, but those games are much easier to jump into & go. Since I'm talking about games...I never bothered to finish Half-Life or Quake 2, I got bored with both. I enjoyed Unreal - the Awakening though. Hey, maybe I am a gamer...lol.

Asus A7N8X-X
1800+ @ 8.5 x 200MHz
768MB PC3200 2.5-3-3-7
Asus A9550GE/TD 128MB
WinME/WinXP Pro


0

Response Number 9
Name: jam
Date: July 14, 2005 at 09:12:58 Pacific
Reply:

While I'm in the mood, I'll rattle off a few more of the oldies but goodies...

DOOM
Shadow Warrior
Heretic
Hexen
Duke Nukem
Blood

I obviously favor 1st person shooters...lol

Asus A7N8X-X
1800+ @ 8.5 x 200MHz
768MB PC3200 2.5-3-3-7
Asus A9550GE/TD 128MB
WinME/WinXP Pro


0

Response Number 10
Name: beosuser
Date: July 14, 2005 at 09:45:01 Pacific
Reply:

u got all those older games?


0

Response Number 11
Name: jam
Date: July 14, 2005 at 09:55:20 Pacific
Reply:

yes, I do...you want copies? ;) lol

Asus A7N8X-X
1800+ @ 8.5 x 200MHz
768MB PC3200 2.5-3-3-7
Asus A9550GE/TD 128MB
WinME/WinXP Pro


0

Response Number 12
Name: heropsycho2177
Date: July 14, 2005 at 10:26:17 Pacific
Reply:

Jam -

Try Call of Duty and its expansion. They're kind of short, but they're really good single player experiences. They struck the perfect balance between realistic enough to be very immersive, but easy enough to be able for anyone to start playing immediately. They'd also run exceptionally well on your 9550, too. :-)

"We do see eye to eye on a number of things though & I appreciate it when you back me up."

Right back at you!

"Republicans in Congress are moving to ratify a constitutional amendment to ban flag burning, thus ending the Iraq insurgency."


0

Response Number 13
Name: anoncompboy
Date: July 14, 2005 at 13:22:21 Pacific
Reply:

Yea, I play call of duty united offensive on my 9250 with all the settings turned up and it plays great (40fps)

~matt
Abit KV7-V
AMD athlon 2800+ Barton
512 pc3200
80gb SATA
ATI Radeon 9250
_____
[=[_]=] ______
[+[_]+] > {+[__]+}


0

Response Number 14
Name: houston1981
Date: July 14, 2005 at 19:29:23 Pacific
Reply:

Ill just throw in my 2 cents as this discussion seems to be popping ap a bit lately.


Sure performance vs price is a good way to look at things and for every PC i buy/build ithat is the main consideration, but by that logic, we would all still be watching 20cm black and white TV's and riding around on Vespa's.

Some people just want more. If you think you get the same gaming experience on a <$500 pc as you would get on a beast gaming machine $3000 + i think your mistaken.

My rig was fairly expensive and so was the setup i have for my home theatre but that's because i don't just want the game i want the experience.

The one thing that bothers me is games like Battlefield 2 and such, that need high end equipment but don't deliver. BF2 looks crap no matter what PC you run it on and i find that to be a waste when you can get a game like Half-Life 2 that is so much better and not nearly as intensive on a machine.

ramble ramble ramble mumble mumble ,.....

What where was I? What topic i didn't see any topic,.....

AMD Athlon64 3500+
1024MB 512x2 Dual Channel Corsair TwinX
Coolermaster Wavemaster
120GB Seagate SATA HDD
Gecube X800XT Platinum
Logitch 5.1 Surround
LG 16x Dual Layer DVD
Countle


0

Response Number 15
Name: houston1981
Date: July 14, 2005 at 19:33:28 Pacific
Reply:

And just before anyone jumps on me =D

When i have someone over for a game i actually run NFSU2 on a PIII 700 with a PCI Geforce 4 MX440. It's like its made of lego but it still runs =P

AMD Athlon64 3500+
1024MB 512x2 Dual Channel Corsair TwinX
Coolermaster Wavemaster
120GB Seagate SATA HDD
Gecube X800XT Platinum
Logitch 5.1 Surround
LG 16x Dual Layer DVD
Countle


0

Response Number 16
Name: heropsycho2177
Date: July 14, 2005 at 21:59:24 Pacific
Reply:

"...by that logic, we would all still be watching 20cm black and white TV's and riding around on Vespa's.

Some people just want more. If you think you get the same gaming experience on a <$500 pc as you would get on a beast gaming machine $3000 + i think your mistaken."

If you're loaded with money, by all means. However, most people aren't, yet they feel like they must spend $400 on a gfx card.

Price/performance means getting the best experience for the money you can. I want to run my games at a decent resolution and good image quality. That helps the experience of the game. But does it really help the experience to go from 1280x1024 to 1600x1200 res? Not much. What about 4x anti-aliasing vs 8x? Again, not really.

Also, you shouldn't let a lack of high performing hardware prevent you from enjoying a game. The whole point of games is to enjoy them.

However, I do understand what you're saying, it's precisely the point I make when making the case for a $150 card vs. Jam's sub $100 cards.

On the topic of home theaters, I am a self-admitted elitist, so don't discuss that with me, or I'll end up enraging you when I inevitably call your equipment crap. LOL...

"Pat Buchanan, Bob Novak, and G. Gordon Liddy don't like Mark Felt. Mark Felt is truly a great man."


0

Response Number 17
Name: Aaron420
Date: July 27, 2005 at 06:58:10 Pacific
Reply:

HAhahahaha, you guys are funny..... all i have to say is i spent 700 bucks on a BFG6800GT OC GDDR3 blah blah blah, but thats what they first came out about 6 or 7 months ago, (maybe more) and now look at the price LOL. Its alllll in prefrences, if you like to spend money, even if you dont have it(like me) your going to. If you get the sickness(which i have) then your going to want the most expensive/best thing out. I build comps for a living, and youd be surprised how easy it is to talk someone into buying a badayse video card. All i had to do was show them Half-life2 on my sys, and i sold 3 or 4 more just like mine, and i spent over 3 grand on my sys, and im not even satisfied... let me put it to you like this... everyones got the sickness for somthing, wheather it be your cars or trucks, or model airplanes, or even stamps, but you have to spend money. Even if you dont have lots of it... isnt everything good worth the wait? i say spend the extra 400 bucks, and even if somthing better comes out, if your that much of a gamer(like myself) then youll have the new stuff when it comes out. Check out the SLI performence from BFG... thats in my next comp coming up. Oh yah and one more thing.... ALWAYS buy BFG, even if you hate nvidia, BUY BFG. Its the ONLY, and i prolly sure the ONLY lifetime warrenty manufacturer, and when over clocking and water cooling, ive had to rplace mine for free twice, and they have NO problems with that.


0

Response Number 18
Name: houston1981
Date: August 1, 2005 at 16:46:55 Pacific
Reply:

Aaron, your 100% correct, everyone has the sickness for something, take myself for example, ive never bought a car that lasted me more then 6 months because i don't see the point in expensive cars, they do a job and thats it. But my brother on the other hand is all about high performance cars and spends big bucks on it.

The point that i want to make is that .... well i don't know what the point is really =D

But ill never get sick of buying new toys and the bigger, badder and better they are the better it will be.


0

Response Number 19
Name: NeonVII
Date: August 3, 2005 at 09:29:42 Pacific
Reply:

"...i spent over 3 grand on my sys, and im not even satisfied..."

$3,000 wow!!! is your sys made of gold!? lol
i cant see how you could spend more than 1500-2000 bux on the machine alone (excluding monitor, speakers etc.)to ultra-max out EVERYTHING. so i wonder if im missing a component here, 3.5 GHz P4, top of the line Asus mobo., 400GB western digital HDD, DVD RW, 2 gigs of Corsair DDR400 RAM and last but not least the grand daddy of all video cards the Radeon X800 XT Platinum Edition (i found it for under $430) and thats if you put everything in a fantastic looking case (most under $150)you got your self a MONSTER! if you calculate all of that you'll come up short of $2,000 USD and thats by online stores (brand new msrp)so you must have the biggest, most wonderful $1,000 monitor in North America lol.


0

Response Number 20
Name: NeonVII
Date: August 3, 2005 at 10:03:41 Pacific
Reply:

Actually....make that a Radeon X850 XT Platinum Edition for under $400 lol ;)


0

Sponsored Link
Ads by Google
Reply to Message Icon

Video Card Suggestion nee... Catalyst C.C. black scree...



Post Locked

This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.


Go to PC Gaming Forum Home


Sponsored links

Ads by Google


Results for: The Best Budget Video Cards

The best PCI video card www.computing.net/answers/gaming/the-best-pci-video-card/4763.html

Best PCI video card www.computing.net/answers/gaming/best-pci-video-card/1282.html

best pci video card www.computing.net/answers/gaming/best-pci-video-card/5258.html