Hi, i just got a new system: AMD XP Moblie 2500+ @ 3200+ (11 x 200Mhz) Asus A7N8X-E Deluxe 2x512MB DDR400 Kingston GeForce FX 5900XT Windows XP Pro So now i'm playing a lot of games.. i just finished DooM3, wich is working excelent on my sytstem with evrything on high @ 1280x1024 And also games like Call of Duty, Battlefield Vietnam & Halflife are working perfect The only game that gives problems is FarCry.. I never had so many error messages and fails.. it's also pretty slow, so why cant i run FarCry as good as DooM3?

Lots of people have had problems with farcry, if you look at the farcry help forum on the Ubisoft website you'll see that lots of things are wrong with farcry. I think the game was rushed, originally it was designed to be a demo for the FX range of Nvidia cards, but they decided to make a full game out of it. I don't think they did a good job of optimizing it, allowing it to be used on lower-end systems, and as a result you need a fairly beefy computer to run it reasonably. There is a v1.1 patch available, a v1.2 patch was out for a while, but they withdrew it because it had issues with certain hardware brands. Farcry just isn't a good example of a well-written and developed game. AMD Athlon XP2200+ Aero7 lite 512mb Crucial pc2700 Abit NF7-s V2.0 80GB Seagate SATA 120GB Seagate SATA Geforce4 Ti4200 128mb Benq FP767-12 17" 12ms SB live 5.1 Digital

Not to mention, If you get it to work you wont want to play because its so hard. Avarik ~ FETCH3R - AIM

Its not that hard :P -------------------- Asus P4P800S mb P4 2.4Ghz (800Mhz) 1Gb DDR3200 Ram Asus Geforce FX 5600 128mb

A game being hard is a dumb reason not to play... =D AMD Athlon XP 3200+ Asus A7N8X-Deluxe 2x512MB PC3200 @ 2-2-2-6 ATI Radeon 9800 pro 128MB WDC 40GB