Tom's Guide | Tom's Hardware | Tom's Games
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Name: dsarosh
Hi,
This questions is not actually about gaming, and is more for my information/curiosity. I am not having any computer problems or buying anything new.1) I am just curious to know if wheter I buy a new motherboard in around June 2007, will that motherboard have an onboard graphics that is guaranteed to be fully dx10 compatable?
If not, when can we expect to find all motherboards with onboard graphics adapters that are fully dx 10 compatable.2) How good will these dx10 onboard graphics be able to handle applications suuch as photoshop cs2? Last tie I ran photoshop cs2 on my onboard Prosavage S3 graphics, it was very slow.
I hope the motherboards of the future will have powerful enough graphics adapters that can handle photoshop easily, so I dont need to buy a graphics card just to run photoshop.
Sarosh

dx10 will feature the latest skinning texturing process and physics based application. let say Agea and Havoc. where Nvidia and Ati is now collaborating with Havoc to feature physic core processor in their latest board. may be featured in the GeForce10 and RadeonX2 (dunno the real name though sorry). i damn sure this core will only be available in their best flagship board.
P4TypeC 2.8GHz HT
ASUS P4PEX/i845
Apacer 1GB DDR400RAM
Seagate 40GB/120GB HDD
GeForce 6600GT 128GDDR3
LiteOn DVD Drive
ASUS CDRW Drive
Sound Blaster Audigy 4
WindowsXPSP1

"I hope the motherboards of the future will have powerful enough graphics adapters that can handle photoshop easily"
Your graphics card has very little, if anything, to do with performance in Photoshop. All the work is done by your processor. So, your processor and system memory are what you need to be concerned with. Photoshop does not utilize real-time, 3-D graphics. It's a static, 2-D application.
Michael J

Thanks for your replies,
When can I expect to by a standard, medium priced motherboard that features an onboard graphics adapter to be fully dx10 compatable.
Will it be only next year, or can I expect to buy an onboard dx10 graphics adapter in the next few months?
Thanks again.
Sarsoh.Sarosh

I have to ask.
What is your fixation on DirectX10. Your supposed reasoning is for better Photoshop performance - but Photoshop does not use DirectX, which is why there are no video card specs listed in their system requirements: http://www.adobe.com/products/photo...
DirectX is used in games and other high-performance multimedia applications. And, with respect to games, on-board graphics is always a bad choice. With multi core processors there is talk of bringing high-quality graphics back to the motherboard by utilizing one or more cores for video only. But, there is nothing in production at this time.
Michael J

I have no fixation with Dx10.
I just want to make a wise upgrade whenever I do one.
Maybe I am wrong, but I think an onboard dx10 graphics adapter should be quite a bit better than the current onboard dx9 adapters.
I am trying to avoid a situation where I plan to upgrade to a new computer system sometime in June 2007, only to find that I am going to have a dx9 onboard graphics.
With a dx10 onboard graphics I can atlest expect to get some feel of the new games, whereas the dx10 games may not run on a dx9 onboard graphics.
I am just trying to make sure that when I buy a new motherboard, I dont buy something like dx9 which is already old and is on its way out.One more questions: Do you think there is any chance at all that nvidia and/or ati will launch dx 10 cards that are agp?
Do you think they might launch at least one version of dx10 agp cards?
Thanks,
Sarosh.Sarosh

Yes they are!
But remember, as far as I know,
DX10 will be exclusively for Microsft Vista.
That means not just a new Motherboard for U!
But a Major upgrade to handle the OS minimal requirements!
Samuel Roshan

future proofing describes the elusive process of trying to anticipate future developments, so that action can be taken to minimise possible negative consequences...
So... good luck with that
Diplomacy is the art of saying 'Nice doggie!'... till you can find a rock

True,
But I have been called names here for having a p4 northwood cpu alrady. It has been called crappy and slow and what not.
So I guess you guys will will find fault if use old hardware and you guys will find fault if I try to make wise upgrade choices.Sarosh

Samrock:
But remember, as far as I know,
DX10 will be exclusively for Microsft Vista.
That means not just a new Motherboard for U!
But a Major upgrade to handle the OS minimal requirements!
I actually Ran the Vista RC1 on my computer, and it ran just fine. I had some sound problems, but that was fixed by uninstalling and reinstalling the application.
I am using RC1 right now as I post here.
I do not need to buy any new hardware to run vista.
Also, I do not need to buy any new hardware at all. I am just trying to gather information about when will we find motherboards with onboard dx10 cards.
My current onboard card is prosavage s3, and I thik this is a dx8 card, and is absolutely miserable with photoshop.When I buy a new motherboard, I would settle for a mb without any pcie slot but with a good onboard graphics chip that will minimum handle photoshop, and secondly give me atleast some feel of some new games for my occassional recreation.
Sarosh

"My current onboard card is prosavage s3, and I thik this is a dx8 card, and is absolutely miserable with photoshop."
Miserable in what respect? Your performance in Photoshop is not dependant upon the video card - you need to look at CPU, Memory & hard drive. If it is image quality that is the problem, then your display is most likely the cuplrit.
Michael J

Hi,
The photoshop website says 320MB of RAM (384MB recommended)
In my experience, I would describe using photoshop with 512MB as "miserable".
What I mean is that it is extremely inconvienient, and after you open more than 2 big files, it begins to get very annoying where every operation starts spinning up the HD. Those website requirements are very misleading.When I ran photoshop cs2 on my onboard graphcis, it was very slow. My work involves lot of moving of objects. It is not very creative stuff, just regular photoshop stuff, but I got to use many files (jpeg, gif, etc), I got to place files over files and match their locations.
Some of the tiff files are 25mb big, and some photoshop files contian more than 2 such files.When I try to move about these big files on the screen, it is just two slow. The whole layer will dissapear and then redraw itself.
The same happens with text boxes. When I move the text boxes around, they dissapear from the screen and then reappear after a second or so.I dont want to buy a new mb in the future to find that this new mb is stil not running photoshop smoothly.
My current onboard adapter is dx8, and the last drivers were released sometime in 2003.
I think photoshop cs2 is newer than that, and newer than xp service pack 2 (which contains drivers for prosavage s3).
Sarosh

Photoshop is not a DirectX application. I don't know how to put it more simply than that.
Michael J

Doesnt moving jepg files around the screen require some input from the graphics card, or is it totally dependent on the cpu speed?
Sarosh

With respect to Windows XP, when you are working within the windows desktop environment, then it is all a 2 dimensional display. DirectX is utilized in 3D applications.
Your system specs look fine for Photoshop. If you are having issues I would suggest defragging the hard drive and making sure there is adequate free space. Also, you might want to check your page file settings. you would also benefit from more RAM.
Any photo conversions/processing are dependant upon the CPU. Some of these processes are VERY complex and will take time to complete. Especially when you are dealing with large files, layering and transparency. A new video card will not change that.
Yes, your video card is what provides the display, but when dealing with 2D displays they are not really being utilized.
Michael J

Hi,
Photoshop runs fine on my current system, 1GB ram is just about ok. The only problem I had was when my 6600GT unexpectededly failed. I had to use photoshop on the onboard grapics. I would be very happy to do it, but I found it almost unworkable. It was not the HD or defragmenting, it was the lack of the 6600GT that brought photoshop down to a crawl. Maybe my s3 is just too old and outdated.
I tried for two days, but when I could not bear it any more I purchased a fx5200 and photoshop was again working at full speed. That led me to beleive that photoshop will need a vedio card with on board memory.Maybe someone should carry out this test:
Trying moving a jpeg file around your desktop by dragging it around. Or try moving the winamp visualization around on your desktop. Now do this with the onboard graphics and do this with a vedio card, and I think the difference is obvious. I noticed the very same difference.To sum up, are you guys saying that no matter what motherboard I buy in the future, or no matter what onboard graphics it has, you guys are sure it will run photoshop just as smoothly as I am running it now on my vedio card, right?
Thanks again.
Sarosh.Sarosh

Yes,
I have an onboard graphics (ATI Radeon 300x).I played almost all recent Games (except Riddick/Ghost Recon/Hitman Blood Money).
And I not only use Photoshop,but also 3D Max Studio, Winamp and many apps, all together. I never found any problem. Only rendering Hi-res images in 3D takes sometime. But that never hangs my system. I still play songs while working on all these Graphic Stuff!
So don't worry abt Onboard or "Off Board" cards! :)
Whatever u get will run Photoshop smoothly!Samuel Roshan

Thanks,
I am glad you gave me a real life experience. Thats what I wanted to know.
Id settle for a motherboard with onboard graphics anyday rather than an expensive mb with onboard graphcis+pcie slot and then have to buy a graphics card to run photoshop.
Thanks for all the input.
Sarosh.
Sarosh

U should invest in a good motherboard with both Onboard Grafix and PCI-E Slot.
This will help u in future Upgrades.
My MOBO has both!! Just waiting for the DX10 Cards to get into market!
Samuel Roshan

Thanks dude,
At first I too thought the same.
But then I read some articles about how the next generation of gpus are going to require even more power, so I think my 500W psu may not be enough.
Then I also read about games like crysis and Alan Wake, which will require quad core cpus to run properly.
So I think in the future the race for better gaming hardware is only going to get tougher, and it is going to get more expensive to buy decent gaming hardware.So I thought it would be better for me to forget about trying to get the best from gaming, and focusing on what is more important for me, ie photoshop.
I am not a gamer anyway, and have played most of the best dx9 games anyway, and am actually pretty bored of gaming right now.
I am not enjoying the games any more, and they are serving as more of a distraction than fun. So I thought I better buy a mb with no pcie slot, so that I wont be tempted to buy a vedio card in the future.Also, I am quite confused about pci-e 8x and 16x and I dont know which card will work in which motherboard, and then I read the news about pcie2 being released soon.
Its like a never ending race, and I want to get out of it.Sarosh

![]() |
Computer Freeze when gami...
|
looking for old computer ...
|

This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.
| Ads by Google |