Computer Problems? Computing.Net has over 1,000,000 posts about all things technology related! Over 90% answered within 24 hours! Click here to start participating now! Also, be sure to check out the New User Guide.
Is a GF4ti4200 better than FX5200?
Name: zachery Date: November 28, 2003 at 09:58:30 Pacific OS: XP pro CPU/Ram: 2000+/512 333mhz
Comment:
Hey, what is better? A Geforce 4 Ti4200 (64mb version, faster than 128) or Geforce FX5200 128mb? I am getting my GF4Ti 4200 fixed right now (voltage regulator blew). My friend has a 5200, and i want to know which one is better? Thanks- Zack
Name: XT-0wNaGe Date: November 28, 2003 at 10:12:35 Pacific
Reply:
The GF4Ti4200 is much better than the FX5200.
0
Response Number 2
Name: Xoglet Date: November 28, 2003 at 10:21:31 Pacific
Reply:
LOL you cant tell , ?? wait till you get yours back then run a comparison test like 3dmark re:fx "blown into the weeds" is a good phrase. The only thing your Ti doesnt do is support DX9 . so what. Next year you'll probably upgrade to a better card anyway. confirmation here;
Name: {XT} Date: November 28, 2003 at 12:29:26 Pacific
Reply:
lol everybody knows that FX5200 sucks and GF4TI4200 is good even though it cant support DX9.
0
Response Number 4
Name: spliff Date: November 28, 2003 at 18:02:15 Pacific
Reply:
the ti4200 is a much better card than the fx5200,but the fx5200 ultra is a better card
0
Response Number 5
Name: Bucks Date: November 29, 2003 at 13:00:59 Pacific
Reply:
the Ti4200 is definitally better
0
Response Number 6
Name: spliff Date: November 29, 2003 at 21:11:56 Pacific
Reply:
fyi there are 4 models of the ti4200 i know of. of them 3 have a gpu mhz's of 250 and the 4th one is 275 mhz's . the fx5200 ultra has a gpu of 325 mhz. the standard fx5200 has a gpu of 250mhz.
0
Response Number 7
Name: plyduster Date: November 30, 2003 at 14:40:12 Pacific
Reply:
Just because the FX 5200 ultra has a higher core clock, doesn't mean its faster than the ti4200.
Name: Fragmatic Date: November 30, 2003 at 19:19:54 Pacific
Reply:
The 5200 is the "MX" card of the GeForce FX range, but many people fall into the trap of buying one because its a GeForce FX :(
Its just about as good as a GeForce 4 mx 440 with DX9 added on really.
If you want a performence gain from your 4200, they can easily be overclocked to 4400 speeds and be pushed to 4600 speeds :)
Although it doesn't support DX9, it will still run DX9 games, but rather sluggish
0
Response Number 9
Name: spliff Date: November 30, 2003 at 20:38:20 Pacific
Reply:
i just looked at some benchmarks and it looks like the Ti4200 is a little faster. but it didnt draw alot of items in the benchmark screen shots ,that the 5200 ultra had no problems with.
u can see the benchmark im refering too at
www.intelforums.net/viewtopic.php?t=978
0
Response Number 10
Name: plyduster Date: December 1, 2003 at 10:04:45 Pacific
Reply:
That could very well be a driver issue rather than the card itself.
0
Response Number 11
Name: Nate Date: December 16, 2003 at 09:00:45 Pacific
Reply:
Just a question, I have the TI 4200 And I did the updates to DX9 as soon as I installed XP, same time I got my the 4200. Could that be causing low frame rates and sluggishness in games? If so how would I go about going back down to Dx8?
Summary: Hi, i have an ati radeon 9800 pro 128mb videocard which can run on an agp 8x port but my motherboard has only a 4x agp slot. How much improvement would it be to buy another motherboard that does have ...
Summary: A 1600x1400 display should be called Spongebob SquareScreen. You should try for 1600x1200, if not 1680x1050, since you have a widescreen. It'll look a lot better. And you're right--that PC is quite a...
Summary: Hi, Im looking at two different laptops, one has an ATI Radeon Mobility 9600 graphics card its an Averatec 6100 laptop, and the other has a Nvidia Geforce4 go 440 its a HP or Compaq laptop, havent dec...
0 
ps2 dvd dataformat change
