|
|
|
FX5700 vs 6200 Gaming on a budget
|
Original Message
|
Name: max5
Date: August 9, 2005 at 05:51:57 Pacific
Subject: FX5700 vs 6200 Gaming on a budgetOS: SuSE LINUX 8.2 / WindowsCPU/Ram: 2 Ghz Celeron - 640 MB DD |
Comment: I need help, planning to buy a new Video Card but I'm on a budget my choices are to go Old School with an FX5700, or get a newer 6200. Help. thanks.
Report Offensive Message For Removal
|
|
Response Number 1
|
Name: dropkick
Date: August 9, 2005 at 06:57:56 Pacific
Subject: FX5700 vs 6200 Gaming on a budget |
Reply: (edit)Hi look on www.tomshardware.com site agp pcie for a comparison, the 6200pcie has the edge , just a few fps in it ut04 doom3 etc both low end scores but playable. re: u r pc spec for a 6200 agp or pcie? ,& OS id look for the one that has linux drivers offered as standard ;)
Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal
|
|
Response Number 2
|
Name: max5
Date: August 9, 2005 at 07:31:05 Pacific
Subject: FX5700 vs 6200 Gaming on a budget |
Reply: (edit)I'm using AGP, there is an Inno3d 6200 AGP. it says here http://www.techpowerup.com/gpudb/ that the 5700 has a faster core clock than the 6200 but pipelines and shaders.... There are some dudes at school who make drivers for linux, I hear they're pretty decent. well thanks anyway dropkick SuSE LINUX 8.2 / Windows XP 2 Ghz Celeron - 640 MB DDR ASUS MOBO - GF4 MX
Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal
|
|
Response Number 3
|
Name: max5
Date: August 9, 2005 at 07:46:17 Pacific
Subject: FX5700 vs 6200 Gaming on a budget |
Reply: (edit)follow-up question can any of the two cards that I mentioned (fx5700, 6200) play DOOM3 or Half-Life2, FarCry on my machine? SuSE LINUX 8.2 / Windows XP 2 Ghz Celeron - 640 MB DDR ASUS MOBO - GF4 MX
Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal
|
|
Response Number 4
|
Name: heropsycho2177
Date: August 9, 2005 at 07:57:35 Pacific
Subject: FX5700 vs 6200 Gaming on a budget |
Reply: (edit)Both should, but the 6200 would be better for all three. "Republicans in Congress are moving to ratify a constitutional amendment to ban flag burning, thus ending the Iraq insurgency."
Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal
|
|
Response Number 5
|
Name: dropkick
Date: August 10, 2005 at 07:27:08 Pacific
Subject: FX5700 vs 6200 Gaming on a budget |
Reply: (edit)Hi again , Doom3 plays ok 800x600 few effects rendered scenes drop alot of frames, farcry plays with a few effects off and 800x600 just okish , dont expect to be thrilled tho ,having had a 5600fx256 meg and now a 6600gt id save up and get somthing a bit better, i now win lan & on line ;) A Fx5950 isnt too great a leap in cost (or 9800 ati.) but the performance is a big jump approx 40fps is a good fps to play, look here for comparisons; http://graphics.tomshardware.com/graphic/20050705/vga-charts-pcie-07.html regards
Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal
|
|
Response Number 6
|
Name: heropsycho2177
Date: August 10, 2005 at 09:14:01 Pacific
Subject: FX5700 vs 6200 Gaming on a budget |
Reply: (edit)With a 2GHz Celeron, he's not gonna be able to take advantage of a 6600GT. "Republicans in Congress are moving to ratify a constitutional amendment to ban flag burning, thus ending the Iraq insurgency."
Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal
|
|
Response Number 7
|
Name: max5
Date: August 11, 2005 at 02:04:18 Pacific
Subject: FX5700 vs 6200 Gaming on a budget |
Reply: (edit)ok thanks alot guys. SuSE LINUX 8.2 / Windows XP 2 Ghz Celeron - 640 MB DDR ASUS MOBO - GF4 MX
Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal
|
|
Response Number 8
|
Name: dropkick
Date: August 11, 2005 at 03:55:15 Pacific
Subject: FX5700 vs 6200 Gaming on a budget |
Reply: (edit)Hi i was advocating the 9550 or 9800, but sure cellys have a cache issue, his mobo hopefully has x4, x8 agp. doom3 is a pretty terrible game for most average pcs hence my last yrs upgrades were a voyage of discovery, & hindsight is wonderful thing (yeah ive owned a fx5200 :/ LOL ) just shared experiance to help ppl not fall at the first hurdle. :)
Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal
|
Use following form to reply to current message:
|
|

|