Computing.Net > Forums > PC Gaming > Doom 3 is a bit disappointing!

Computer Problems? Computing.Net has over 1,000,000 posts about all things technology related! Click here to start participating now! Also, check out the New User Guide.

Doom 3 is a bit disappointing!

Reply to Message Icon

Name: snoopy104
Date: September 4, 2004 at 11:24:09 Pacific
OS: .
CPU/Ram: .
Comment:

I just bought doom3 from Pcworld yesterday, got round to installing it today and played it for about 2 hours.

It runs well on my machine at 800x600 on medium settings.

I'm not too impressed with the gameplay iteslf though. It's just another one of many first person shooters and I don't find it in the least bit scary. I'm not sure what I expected from it, but it just feels like Farcry, minus the nice tropical island but with slightly different monsters and slightly different weapons...

I find that the guns run out of ammo far too quickly and are far too underpowered, the low lighting means you can't see where you are going, let alone see what you are shooting at, the rooms seem a little same-ish and the lack of any form of map or even a compass makes it a bit frustrating trying to get anywhere. I have found myself wandering round in circles numerous times already.

It has nice graphics but just lacks any real excitement for me...

AMD Athlon XP2200+
Aero7 lite
512mb Crucial pc2700
Abit NF7-s V2.0
80GB Seagate SATA
120GB Seagate SATA
Geforce4 Ti4200 128mb
Benq FP767-12 17" 12ms
SB live 5.1 Digital



Sponsored Link
Ads by Google

Response Number 1
Name: Stu.B
Date: September 4, 2004 at 11:38:48 Pacific
Reply:

Yeah I think you raise a fair argument Snoop. Least you got to go to PC World lol.

Radeon 9800 Pro 128Mb
AMD Barton 2800
Asus A7N8X E-Deluxe
512 DDRAM PC2700


0

Response Number 2
Name: snoopy104
Date: September 4, 2004 at 12:56:08 Pacific
Reply:

I bought it from pcworld.co.uk because it was £5 cheaper than amazon, not the shop, because everything is so expensive and the sales staff talk too much rubbish lol!

AMD Athlon XP2200+
Aero7 lite
512mb Crucial pc2700
Abit NF7-s V2.0
80GB Seagate SATA
120GB Seagate SATA
Geforce4 Ti4200 128mb
Benq FP767-12 17" 12ms
SB live 5.1 Digital


0

Response Number 3
Name: Chunko
Date: September 4, 2004 at 13:06:02 Pacific
Reply:

Yeah I would have to agree.
It was a waist of a hard earned $55 if you ask me.


0

Response Number 4
Name: plyduster
Date: September 4, 2004 at 15:31:30 Pacific
Reply:

Doom 3 does not live up to the hype.


0

Response Number 5
Name: Dark29delx
Date: September 4, 2004 at 18:07:37 Pacific
Reply:

Agree 100%!

I am very disappointed... I barely even play it anymore after I beat it. I only played it for a week. It wasnt even that fun. Better than farcry though but nothing revolutianry.

I too waisted $55!

Intel Pentium 4 2.6Ghz w/ HT and 800Mhz fbs.
512MB DUAL CHANNEL SDRAM
ATI Radeon 9800 PRO 128MB DDR
120GB HD
Sound Blaster Live! 5.1
4.1 Altec Lansing Surround Sound Speakers w/ subwofe


0

Related Posts

See More



Response Number 6
Name: Fishystix
Date: September 4, 2004 at 19:24:56 Pacific
Reply:

"Doom 3 does not live up to the hype."

"Agree 100%!
I am very disappointed... I barely even play it anymore after I beat it. I only played it for a week. It wasnt even that fun. Better than farcry though but nothing revolutianry."

Unfortunately I think there was a little TOO MUCH hype. If we (the general gaming community) would have put Doom 3 under more wraps and kept it as just another delayed game (a very very delayed game) and just forgot about the "Doom" name, I think we would have had better thoughts about it. And yes, there is almost NO replay value and the multi-player is more than an insult to id Software.


0

Response Number 7
Name: Chunko
Date: September 4, 2004 at 21:36:43 Pacific
Reply:

Regardless of the hype,it still wouldn't have been a game I would want to play over again.
Is it me or does anyone notice how bad the textures look up close?(ie..the candy bars in the candy machines and even on some of the walls).


0

Response Number 8
Name: Sabertooth
Date: September 4, 2004 at 21:50:12 Pacific
Reply:

......switching between flashlight and firearm becomes really aggravating after about the thousandth time, and id ought to have spent more time on the plot rather than the much talked about graphics since it is pitch dark for nearly every level in the game anyway, also I agree with the low replay rating comment from above. D3 did not totally live up to its pre-release hype and am glad I was not one of the ppl that had to upgrade their rig in addition to shelling out $50 just to be able to run the game.

PS....Some form of navigational device will be good too, sometimes some of those pda's are as elusive as iraq's WMD.

____________________________
The greatest risk is not taking one


0

Response Number 9
Name: Dark29delx
Date: September 4, 2004 at 22:47:45 Pacific
Reply:

the flashlights should be mounted on the guns!

Intel Pentium 4 2.6Ghz w/ HT and 800Mhz fbs.
512MB DUAL CHANNEL SDRAM
ATI Radeon 9800 PRO 128MB DDR
120GB HD
Sound Blaster Live! 5.1
4.1 Altec Lansing Surround Sound Speakers w/ subwofe


0

Response Number 10
Name: DocMemory
Date: September 4, 2004 at 23:22:57 Pacific
Reply:

I heard that some modder out there made a 'duct tape' mod that allows the flashlight to be put on the weapon. It is available at File Planet.

"Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one less travelled by, And that has made all the difference." Frost


0

Response Number 11
Name: Chunko
Date: September 4, 2004 at 23:28:11 Pacific
Reply:

The ductape mod really helps out with lighting.Hell,its the only reason I finished the game..If not for that mod I would have stopped playing it.(Probably would have sold it).
Another sad characteristic about the game is the music..What music!!One would think that the music would shadow the great graphics.Well thats not the case in this game.There is simply no music,no melodies no emotion,just a few bars of digital effects here and there.I remember reading that the drummer from NIN was doing some music for the game,I was excited as I am a fan of the band..Well WTF!!
Thanks id for misleading the public.
All I can say is that all the hype for Half-Life2 will be justified and will not be another let-down.
Half-Life2 already took the crown for game of the year if you ask me.


0

Response Number 12
Name: Hooner
Date: September 5, 2004 at 00:44:56 Pacific
Reply:

You all expected too much. It is what it is, a solid FPS with superb visuals.

Some people are like Slinkies, not really good for anything, but you still can't help but smile when you see one tumble down the stairs...


0

Response Number 13
Name: echelon4
Date: September 5, 2004 at 01:20:28 Pacific
Reply:

i reckon that it's good how u can't have a gun and flashlight at the same time. That's what gives you the shocks, when u suddenly find out there's an enemy there, and u have 2 switch to ur gun, or when u have ur gun out, and a random monster jumps out from the dark. THe flashlight thing is what makes the game challenging and scary.


0

Response Number 14
Name: Stu.B
Date: September 5, 2004 at 03:34:27 Pacific
Reply:

Even if you didn't like DOOM3 I think there's still hope for the Engine (e.g. Quake 4?)

Radeon 9800 Pro 128Mb
AMD Barton 2800
Asus A7N8X E-Deluxe
512 DDRAM PC2700


0

Response Number 15
Name: TheWooMan
Date: September 5, 2004 at 07:26:40 Pacific
Reply:

i agree with the people who sent the last few message's. i mean it was'nt going to be a fps like never seen befor. beside's i would like to see any of us do any better!!!! i agree with th flash light thing, cus the orijinal doom was ment to be a scary fps. and with the flash light seprate from the gun it give's you 2 options instead of 1. one option is to have the flash light and save yourself getting the sh*t scared out of you and having to switch to guns as quickly as possible or your dead meat, or two which is o walk around with your gun but be ready for a shock!!! i mean common guys give em a break...


0

Response Number 16
Name: Avarik
Date: September 5, 2004 at 09:47:29 Pacific
Reply:

Doom3 is not what it was hyped to be, but its still a great game, even with no replay value. I can see being upset about shelling 55$ for it, but my copy was a birthday gift :D. Still, I'd gladly support id software, the company that started it all!!1

Avarik ~
nomoresnsleft3 - AIM


0

Response Number 17
Name: XxxFrancisxxxUSA
Date: September 5, 2004 at 10:10:25 Pacific
Reply:

Quake 3 still rocks.


0

Response Number 18
Name: Baz.
Date: September 5, 2004 at 14:28:56 Pacific
Reply:

I was highly dissapointed by Doom3, the single player was ok i guess. Graphically very good, but i found the game became predictable, and enemys easy to judge after a few levels. And multiplayer is the biggest pile of crap ive ever seen. And its the cpl world tour game, laugh!


0

Response Number 19
Name: Fishystix
Date: September 5, 2004 at 14:34:06 Pacific
Reply:

So is anyone going to give Doom 3 ANY credit? Or is it now a piece because people unfortunately have to orgasmate and/or pms over "it should have been this...it should have done that..."?


0

Response Number 20
Name: Chunko
Date: September 5, 2004 at 15:13:07 Pacific
Reply:

"So is anyone going to give Doom 3 ANY credit? Or is it now a piece because people unfortunately have to orgasmate and/or pms over "it should have been this...it should have done that..."?

Well I think the thread subject says it all.
Its not a bad game its just nothing groundbreaking as id hyped it out to be.
We all have reason to be a bit disappointed and this thread is the perfect place to let a bit of stem out.
Its better than having a hundred 'DOOM3 SUCKS'threads if you ask me.


0

Response Number 21
Name: Fishystix
Date: September 5, 2004 at 17:56:20 Pacific
Reply:

"Its better than having a hundred 'DOOM3 SUCKS'threads if you ask me."

I concour. I to was somewhat disappointed but there still is plenty good about the game. $55 for the game? That is kind of a streach. However I did get it for $45 at Target (out of all places haha).


0

Response Number 22
Name: Fishystix
Date: September 5, 2004 at 17:57:23 Pacific
Reply:

Woohoo! Can't spell...

S-t-r-e-t-c-h.


0

Response Number 23
Name: El-Trucha
Date: September 5, 2004 at 18:39:01 Pacific
Reply:

I was about 2 buy that game!! but it was 2 expensive...:(
I never tought that game would have sucked so much...:(

El-Trucha


0

Response Number 24
Name: Avarik
Date: September 5, 2004 at 19:47:24 Pacific
Reply:

It does NOT suck so much! Its worth a play! Its worth 45 at least...

Avarik ~
nomoresnsleft3 - AIM


0

Response Number 25
Name: Hooner
Date: September 5, 2004 at 23:27:14 Pacific
Reply:

Why did you guys all pay so much for it? I paid £17.99 which is like 30 bucks.

Some people are like Slinkies, not really good for anything, but you still can't help but smile when you see one tumble down the stairs...


0

Response Number 26
Name: LeFtBehinD
Date: September 6, 2004 at 03:15:36 Pacific
Reply:

Its not as bad as these ppl make it out to be. Even though i havnt finished it yet, im enjoying it :p

--------------------
Asus P4P800S mb
P4 2.4Ghz (800Mhz)
1Gb DDR3200 Ram
Asus Geforce FX 5600 128mb


0

Response Number 27
Name: Fishystix
Date: September 6, 2004 at 07:50:11 Pacific
Reply:

"Its not as bad as these ppl make it out to be. Even though i havnt finished it yet, im enjoying it :p"

Very much agreed. I guess this is a perfect example of what expectations can do to a game.


0

Response Number 28
Name: j3r3my_07
Date: September 6, 2004 at 14:14:45 Pacific
Reply:

well...if it's just another FPS game why id had to set the price over 50 bux?? i got it for $45 though @ Circuit City...Doom 3 is a decent fps game w/ an overprice tag...

~evans~

A64 3000+
MSI K8T-Neo FIS2R
ST 1GB DDR433
Ati Radeon X800 Pro
250GB SATA HDD


0

Response Number 29
Name: Avarik
Date: September 6, 2004 at 14:39:49 Pacific
Reply:

Did you know the original Warcraft was $60? And nobody b!tched about that...

Avarik ~
nomoresnsleft3 - AIM


0

Response Number 30
Name: snoopy104
Date: September 6, 2004 at 15:41:01 Pacific
Reply:

I've not completed farcry or doom3 yet, but I find myself drawn to playing other games like NFS Underground, Call of Duty, GTA VC etc for the 'n'th time instead for some reason.

I wonder if Halflife 2 will be more of the same?? Thankfully I got a voucher for a free copy of HL2 from my dad's 9600xt so at least I won't have the regret of spending money on it if it's a repeat of doom3 or farcry. Halflife 1 was another game I drifted away from leaving it incomplete.

Doom 3 is a good-ish game, just not really what I would describe as my favourite game. I would have bought it regardless of what other people said about it just because the game was so highly anticipated, so spending £24.99 on it wasn't an issue in that respect. Perhaps they didn't release a demo because they knew people wouldn't buy it after playing it?

As far as playability and replay value goes, I think that the open ended, non-linear gameplay of games like GTA Vice city is the way forward. Perhaps if Doom3 wasn't linear, it might be a little more exciting. To me,it kind of feels like one of those house-of-horrors things found at theme parks, where you just wander down a set path and are attacked by entirely predictable monsters.

As others have said, I'm also glad I didn't upgrade for Doom3. I was planning on getting a 6800gt ready for doom 3, but the old Ti4200 runs it really well (800x600 @ Medium detail as default with good playability and no jerkiness), better than the 64mb Mobility Radeon 9700 in my sisters 3.0GHz P4/512mb ram laptop, which sets to Low detail at 640x480 as default?

So I might wait a while until I find a game worth playing that the mighty Ti won't run well before I upgrade, hopefully card prices will have dropped quite a bit by then!

Overall, doom3 isn't a terrible game, it's just not as good as anyone hoped for in terms of gameplay and is overpriced. Doom is a ledgend amongst games and was groundbreaking stuff back in the 90's and the modern day interpretation: Doom3 just can't live up to it's predecessor's reputation despite all the fancy extra's.

AMD Athlon XP2200+
Aero7 lite
512mb Crucial pc2700
Abit NF7-s V2.0
80GB Seagate SATA
120GB Seagate SATA
Geforce4 Ti4200 128mb
Benq FP767-12 17" 12ms
SB live 5.1 Digital


0

Response Number 31
Name: j3r3my_07
Date: September 6, 2004 at 15:45:15 Pacific
Reply:

Yup...Doom 3 would have been an excellent game in 2001-2002...not in 2004/05 :)

~evans~

A64 3000+
MSI K8T-Neo FIS2R
ST 1GB DDR433
Ati Radeon X800 Pro
250GB SATA HDD


0

Response Number 32
Name: Chunko
Date: September 6, 2004 at 17:28:59 Pacific
Reply:

"Why did you guys all pay so much for it?"
Because we were the weak who fell in to the grasp of id hype.
Plus most of us bought it on the week it was released when it was not on sale at most places of distribution.


0

Response Number 33
Name: Avarik
Date: September 6, 2004 at 19:24:01 Pacific
Reply:

id actually did NOT hype it so much...the crazy fans did.

Avarik ~
nomoresnsleft3 - AIM


0

Response Number 34
Name: El-Trucha
Date: September 7, 2004 at 08:35:19 Pacific
Reply:

Umm...maybe I'll buy it when it gets cheaper...:D

El-Trucha


0

Sponsored Link
Ads by Google
Reply to Message Icon

Diablo 2 Barbarian HP FX5700 Ultra on 1.0 Ghz m...



Post Locked

This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.


Go to PC Gaming Forum Home


Sponsored links

Ads by Google


Results for: Doom 3 is a bit disappointing!

Doom 3 tweaks www.computing.net/answers/gaming/doom-3-tweaks/2526.html

doom 3 impressions www.computing.net/answers/gaming/doom-3-impressions/2458.html

DOOM 3: move over, FarCry www.computing.net/answers/gaming/doom-3-move-over-farcry/2504.html