Specialty Forums
Security and Virus
General Hardware
CPUs/Overclocking
Networking
Digital Photo/Video
Office Software
PC Gaming
Console Gaming
Programming
Database
Web Development
Digital Home

General Forums
Windows XP
Windows Vista
Windows 95/98
Windows Me
Windows NT
Windows 2000
Win Server 2008
Win Server 2003
Windows 3.1
Linux
PDAs
BeOS
Novell Netware
OpenVMS
Solaris
Disk Op. System
Unix
Mac
OS/2

Drivers
Driver Scan
Driver Forum

Software
Automatic Updates

BIOS Updates

My Computing.Net

Solution Center

Free IT eBook

Howtos

Site Search

Message Find

RSS Feeds

Install Guides

Data Recovery

About

Home
Reply to Message Icon Go to Main Page Icon

Subject: 9800pro VS 6600GT

Original Message
Name: echelon4
Date: December 4, 2004 at 23:09:44 Pacific
Subject: 9800pro VS 6600GT
OS: Win XP
CPU/Ram: athlon xp3000+/512ddr
Comment:
Which one runs better under these specifications?

9800pro- 128mb ddr/256bit
6600GT- 128mb ddr/128bit

I heard that the 6600GT whoops the 9800pro, but i was thinking, does the 128/256bit difference do anything?


Report Offensive Message For Removal

Response Number 1
Name: Custom Built
Date: December 5, 2004 at 10:10:39 Pacific
Subject: 9800pro VS 6600GT
Reply: (edit)
"does the 128/256bit difference do anything?"

Thats the whole why the nvidia card is better.


Have the lambs stopped crying Clarice?


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 2
Name: echelon4
Date: December 5, 2004 at 12:39:40 Pacific
Subject: 9800pro VS 6600GT
Reply: (edit)
so 128bit is beter that 256bit? Is that what your saying?

Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 3
Name: snoopy104
Date: December 5, 2004 at 13:35:21 Pacific
Subject: 9800pro VS 6600GT
Reply: (edit)
256 bit is better than 128 bit, otherwise, why would the more expensive 6800 series all use 256 bit??

More bits = larger instructions = greater accuracy = better quality graphics...

AMD Athlon XP2200+
Aero7 lite
512mb Crucial pc2700
Abit NF7-s V2.0
80GB Seagate SATA
120GB Seagate SATA
Geforce4 Ti4200 128mb
Benq FP767-12 17" 12ms
SB live 5.1 Digital


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 4
Name: Custom Built
Date: December 5, 2004 at 15:07:28 Pacific
Subject: 9800pro VS 6600GT
Reply: (edit)
ooops my mistake


I thought the listing was for a 6800GT wich is a 256bit card and the better choice.

Sorry

Have the lambs stopped crying Clarice?


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 5
Name: LeFtBehinD
Date: December 5, 2004 at 17:08:03 Pacific
Subject: 9800pro VS 6600GT
Reply: (edit)
So ur all saying the 9800pro then?

Ive seen heaps of reviews where the 6600gt kills the 9800pro/xt and even beats the newer X800 series cards in some opengl games.

--------------------
Asus P4P800S mb
P4 2.4Ghz (800Mhz)
1Gb DDR3200 Ram
Asus Geforce FX 5600 128mb


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 6
Name: Custom Built
Date: December 5, 2004 at 23:09:27 Pacific
Subject: 9800pro VS 6600GT
Reply: (edit)
You may have read an article about the 6600gt wich was a PCI Express card not AGP.The PCIX cards have twice the bandwidth as a regular AGP style card.

Do you have a PCI express motherboard?

Only very recently has nvidia released an AGP version of the 6600GT.

Have the lambs stopped crying Clarice?


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 7
Name: LeFtBehinD
Date: December 6, 2004 at 02:14:40 Pacific
Subject: 9800pro VS 6600GT
Reply: (edit)
"You may have read an article about the 6600gt wich was a PCI Express card not AGP.The PCIX cards have twice the bandwidth as a regular AGP style card."

No it was the AGP, and that PCI-X bandwith doesnt even get used in todays games so it wouldnt really make much difference.


--------------------
Asus P4P800S mb
P4 2.4Ghz (800Mhz)
1Gb DDR3200 Ram
Asus Geforce FX 5600 128mb


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 8
Name: Custom Built
Date: December 6, 2004 at 10:17:39 Pacific
Subject: 9800pro VS 6600GT
Reply: (edit)
OMG! games dont use bus bandwidth!

VIDEO CARDS DO!!!!!!

Have the lambs stopped crying Clarice?


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 9
Name: Dumb Geek (by bitboy)
Date: December 6, 2004 at 16:16:09 Pacific
Subject: 9800pro VS 6600GT
Reply: (edit)
you dont use ati 9800 vs geforce 6600 man, use ati x700XT vs geforce 6600 and ati x800XT vs geforce 6800

P4 3.2GHZ
kingstom 1GB DDR 3200
Nvidia geforce FX 5950 256mb


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 10
Name: Dumb Geek (by bitboy)
Date: December 6, 2004 at 16:21:02 Pacific
Subject: 9800pro VS 6600GT
Reply: (edit)
by the way, if you wanna compare ati and geforce. you should use radeon series vs FX/TI series, X700/800 vs GT series, you shouldnt use radeon series vs nvidia GT, of course nividia will win, cuz GT series is newer, thats why ATI made X700 or 800 whatever.

P4 3.2GHZ
kingstom 1GB DDR 3200
Nvidia geforce FX 5950 256mb


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 11
Name: LeFtBehinD
Date: December 6, 2004 at 18:28:44 Pacific
Subject: 9800pro VS 6600GT
Reply: (edit)
Here you go. 6600gt clear winner.

http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=2277&p=3

" Across the board, the 6600GT is a better buy than the 9800 Pro. There is no question that the performance is better across the board, and only gets better at higher resolutions. Add to that the fact that the feature set is a year newer, and there really isn't a debate. "

--------------------
Asus P4P800S mb
P4 2.4Ghz (800Mhz)
1Gb DDR3200 Ram
Asus Geforce FX 5600 128mb


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal



Use following form to reply to current message:

   Name: From My Computing.Net Settings
 E-Mail: From My Computing.Net Settings

Subject: 9800pro VS 6600GT

Comments:

 
  Homepage URL (*): 
Homepage Title (*): 
         Image URL: 
 


Data Recovery Software



Version Tracker Pro
Keep your software current and secure, effortlessly

Click Here for a Free Scan

Driver Agent
Automatically find the latest drivers for your computer.
Click Here for a Free Scan



The information on Computing.Net is the opinions of its users. Such opinions may not be accurate and they are to be used at your own risk. Computing.Net cannot verify the validity of the statements made on this site. Computing.Net and Computing.Net, LLC hereby disclaim all responsibility and liability for the content of Computing.Net and its accuracy.
PLEASE READ THE FULL DISCLAIMER AND LEGAL TERMS BY CLICKING HERE

All content ©1996-2007 Computing.Net, LLC