Specialty Forums
Security and Virus
General Hardware
CPUs/Overclocking
Networking
Digital Photo/Video
Office Software
PC Gaming
Console Gaming
Programming
Database
Web Development
Digital Home

General Forums
Windows XP
Windows Vista
Windows 95/98
Windows Me
Windows NT
Windows 2000
Win Server 2008
Win Server 2003
Windows 3.1
Linux
PDAs
BeOS
Novell Netware
OpenVMS
Solaris
Disk Op. System
Unix
Mac
OS/2

Drivers
Driver Scan
Driver Forum

Software
Automatic Updates

BIOS Updates

My Computing.Net

Solution Center

Free IT eBook

Howtos

Site Search

Message Find

RSS Feeds

Install Guides

Data Recovery

About

Home
Reply to Message Icon Go to Main Page Icon

Updating DOS?

Original Message
Name: Hakemon
Date: January 21, 2007 at 22:34:15 Pacific
Subject: Updating DOS?
OS: DOS 4
CPU/Ram: 8086 8MHz / 640KB
Model/Manufacturer: IBM Model 25-XT
Comment:
This is one of the things my A+ certification didn't exactly
cover..

How the heck do you upgrade a DOS installation? My old
IBM PC-XT has DOS 4 on it.. I booted a DOS 5 floppy, and
noticed Windows 3.0 seems to run a little faster with it...
But, how do I update the installation, WITHOUT erasing
the contents on the HD? With a 720KB floppy drive,
backing up is quite hard to pull off..


Report Offensive Message For Removal


Response Number 1
Name: DAVEINCAPS
Date: January 21, 2007 at 23:01:07 Pacific
Subject: Updating DOS?
Reply: (edit)
You could use a dos upgrade version or with a full version I suppose you could delete the dos directory, io.sys, msdos.sys and command.com on the hard drive and then run the installation. A full version installation doesn't need a blank hard drive in order to install.

You'd probably want to rename the existing config.sys and autoexec.bat to something else so you could incorporate any differences between your existing files into the default ones the installation will create.



Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 2
Name: Hakemon
Date: January 21, 2007 at 23:22:50 Pacific
Subject: Updating DOS?
Reply: (edit)
hmm, im using a bootdisk version of DOS 5.. I don't have a
full installation anymore (lost it via age--disk lost the
magnetism)

Is it possible to "sys" it?


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 3
Name: IW2EVK
Date: January 21, 2007 at 23:26:40 Pacific
Subject: Updating DOS?
Reply: (edit)
try this page....

http://www.xs4all.nl/~rjoris/freedo...

Distro from fd 1.0 on 720 / 1,44 boot disk

Roberto
milan italy


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 4
Name: DAVEINCAPS
Date: January 21, 2007 at 23:35:40 Pacific
Subject: Updating DOS?
Reply: (edit)
Yeah, you could sys it with the bootdisk but the other dos files would still be ver. 4 and may not run without adding them all to the setver command.

Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 5
Name: Hakemon
Date: January 21, 2007 at 23:40:48 Pacific
Subject: Updating DOS?
Reply: (edit)
my bootdisk has a bunch of DOS files, i'll just use Windows
3.0 on it and copy and replace them all...

IW2EVK: There is no way that this computer can boot a
FreeDOS installation, I've tried, I just get a blank screen and
it haults (not to mention, I don't think that'll work with
Win30..)


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal


Response Number 6
Name: Mike Newcomb
Date: January 21, 2007 at 23:42:27 Pacific
Subject: Updating DOS?
Reply: (edit)

Go for version 6.2x

Check out the SYS command and then copy the
rest of the files.

Due to the smal capacity floppy it may be best to use PKZIP for copying which compresses the files and spans floppies.

Good Luck. Keep us posted.



Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 7
Name: Hakemon
Date: January 21, 2007 at 23:46:58 Pacific
Subject: Updating DOS?
Reply: (edit)
DOS 6 don't boot on this system either..

Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 8
Name: orbital
Date: January 22, 2007 at 02:50:48 Pacific
Subject: Updating DOS?
Reply: (edit)
"DOS 6 don't boot on this system either.."

I ran M$-DOS 6.22 happily on a 8086 Amstrad IBM Clone, so maybe you have other problems ??


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 9
Name: wizard-fred
Date: January 22, 2007 at 03:10:21 Pacific
Subject: Updating DOS?
Reply: (edit)
What is the density of the floppies of your model 25?

Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 10
Name: Hakemon
Date: January 22, 2007 at 09:08:07 Pacific
Subject: Updating DOS?
Reply: (edit)
they are 720KB drives.. i used a 720KB DOS 6.22 disk, it just
plain refused to boot it..

Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 11
Name: Mechanix2Go
Date: January 22, 2007 at 09:19:32 Pacific
Subject: Updating DOS?
Reply: (edit)
Did it act like the drive did a seek and settle and attempt to read? Will it boot a DOS 4/5x 720K?


=====================================
If at first you don't succeed, you're about average.

M2



Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 12
Name: Hakemon
Date: January 22, 2007 at 10:42:22 Pacific
Subject: Updating DOS?
Reply: (edit)
yes, at first it attempted to, then it left a long BEEEEEEEEEP, then quit..

Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 13
Name: Mechanix2Go
Date: January 22, 2007 at 10:56:00 Pacific
Subject: Updating DOS?
Reply: (edit)
If it's trying to load himem, that might bomb the boot. Try renaming config.sys & autoexec.bat


=====================================
If at first you don't succeed, you're about average.

M2



Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 14
Name: Hakemon
Date: January 22, 2007 at 11:06:59 Pacific
Subject: Updating DOS?
Reply: (edit)
I know it's not himem.sys, cause when I boot DOS 5 on it, (which the boot disk tried to load), it did give a beep, then gave a message saying it required an 80x86, and the driver wouldn't be installed (then it continued booting fine)..

Remember, this old PC has "two" BIOS's, so it might be conflicting with the "ABIOS"...


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 15
Name: Hakemon
Date: January 22, 2007 at 14:19:19 Pacific
Subject: Updating DOS?
Reply: (edit)
ok, got DOS 6.22 booting.. it was a "my bad" type of thing
XD

I was formatting it as 720K on my Domain Controller (only
computer in my house that has a floppy on a modern PC),
and I forgot to tape over the media sense hole...


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 16
Name: Hakemon
Date: January 22, 2007 at 14:50:53 Pacific
Subject: Updating DOS?
Reply: (edit)
argh, spoke too soon..

I can no longer use MS-EDIT.. I get "run-time error R6003 -
integer divide by 0" now...


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 17
Name: DAVEINCAPS
Date: January 22, 2007 at 16:57:51 Pacific
Subject: Updating DOS?
Reply: (edit)
If you're using a 6.22 bootdisk (or sys'd the HD with 6.22) and are running EDIT or other commands from the older 4.0 dos, that may be the problem.

Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 18
Name: Hakemon
Date: January 22, 2007 at 17:23:08 Pacific
Subject: Updating DOS?
Reply: (edit)
both EDITs, from DOS 5, and DOS 6, will not run..

Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 19
Name: SkipCox
Date: January 22, 2007 at 18:08:13 Pacific
Subject: Updating DOS?
Reply: (edit)
Make sure QBASIC.EXE in on your boot disk if you want to run EDIT...it must be in the same directory.

Skip


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 20
Name: Hakemon
Date: January 22, 2007 at 18:35:38 Pacific
Subject: Updating DOS?
Reply: (edit)
I thought QBASIC relied on EDIT, not the other way around...

Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 21
Name: CoffeeBreak
Date: January 22, 2007 at 19:56:31 Pacific
Subject: Updating DOS?
Reply: (edit)
The following is from “help edit” at an MS-DOS6.22 prompt, then at the bottom of the page.

“CAUTION: MS-DOS Editor does not work if the file QBASIC.EXE is not in the current directory or in the search path or in the same directory as the file EDIT.COM. If you delete QBASIC.EXE to save space on your hard disk, you cannot use MS-DOS EDITOR.”

CoffeeBreak


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 22
Name: Hakemon
Date: January 22, 2007 at 20:37:56 Pacific
Subject: Updating DOS?
Reply: (edit)
hmm ok, QBASIC is in the search path then (SET PATH=C:
\DOS)

Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 23
Name: SkipCox
Date: January 24, 2007 at 19:10:03 Pacific
Subject: Updating DOS?
Reply: (edit)
Just put QBASIC.exe on the boot disk...Edit.com should then work.

Skip


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 24
Name: Hakemon
Date: January 25, 2007 at 13:06:14 Pacific
Subject: Updating DOS?
Reply: (edit)
it doesn't, i've tried it.. it don't give an error now, it just
hangs the computer...

being it used to work, and when i booted up DOS 5, it DID
work, DOS 6.22 seems to have damaged support for this
computer in some ways.. I might downgrade back to DOS
5...


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 25
Name: os2fan2
Date: February 23, 2007 at 02:34:28 Pacific
Subject: Updating DOS?
Reply: (edit)
If you are upgrading the same kind of DOS (ie MS-DOS 3.x to 6.x, or PC-DOS 3.x to 7.x or Windows 9x, you can simply replace the DOS files on the hard drive. Don't forget the ibmbio.com/io.sys and ibmdos.com/msdos.sys.

If you are changing DOS types, you need to SYS the drive to install the new boot sector.

Otherwise, you pretty much can have several DOS from the same vendor, and simply replace the boot files (ibmbio.com, io.sys, ibmdos.com, msdos.sys, command.com, config.sys and autoexec.bat), as the need sees it.

The dream you dream alone is only a dream,
The dream we dream together is reality.


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal



Use following form to reply to current message:

   Name: From My Computing.Net Settings
 E-Mail: From My Computing.Net Settings

Subject: Updating DOS?

Comments:

 
  Homepage URL (*): 
Homepage Title (*): 
         Image URL: 
 


Data Recovery Software




how to setup call of duty to joytok

WindowsME / HotMail Problem

Corrupt memory

Convert fat32 to Ntfs

Best WinMo phone of 2008


The information on Computing.Net is the opinions of its users. Such opinions may not be accurate and they are to be used at your own risk. Computing.Net cannot verify the validity of the statements made on this site. Computing.Net and Computing.Net, LLC hereby disclaim all responsibility and liability for the content of Computing.Net and its accuracy.
PLEASE READ THE FULL DISCLAIMER AND LEGAL TERMS BY CLICKING HERE

All content ©1996-2007 Computing.Net, LLC