Computing.Net > Forums > Disk Operating System > Updating DOS?

Computer Problems? Computing.Net has over 1,000,000 posts about all things technology related! Over 90% answered within 24 hours! Click here to start participating now! Also, be sure to check out the New User Guide.

Updating DOS?

Reply to Message Icon

Name: Hakemon
Date: January 21, 2007 at 22:34:15 Pacific
OS: DOS 4
CPU/Ram: 8086 8MHz / 640KB
Product: IBM Model 25-XT
Comment:

This is one of the things my A+ certification didn't exactly
cover..

How the heck do you upgrade a DOS installation? My old
IBM PC-XT has DOS 4 on it.. I booted a DOS 5 floppy, and
noticed Windows 3.0 seems to run a little faster with it...
But, how do I update the installation, WITHOUT erasing
the contents on the HD? With a 720KB floppy drive,
backing up is quite hard to pull off..



Sponsored Link
Ads by Google

Response Number 1
Name: DAVEINCAPS
Date: January 21, 2007 at 23:01:07 Pacific
Reply:

You could use a dos upgrade version or with a full version I suppose you could delete the dos directory, io.sys, msdos.sys and command.com on the hard drive and then run the installation. A full version installation doesn't need a blank hard drive in order to install.

You'd probably want to rename the existing config.sys and autoexec.bat to something else so you could incorporate any differences between your existing files into the default ones the installation will create.



0

Response Number 2
Name: Hakemon
Date: January 21, 2007 at 23:22:50 Pacific
Reply:

hmm, im using a bootdisk version of DOS 5.. I don't have a
full installation anymore (lost it via age--disk lost the
magnetism)

Is it possible to "sys" it?


0

Response Number 3
Name: IW2EVK
Date: January 21, 2007 at 23:26:40 Pacific
Reply:

try this page....

http://www.xs4all.nl/~rjoris/freedo...

Distro from fd 1.0 on 720 / 1,44 boot disk

Roberto
milan italy


0

Response Number 4
Name: DAVEINCAPS
Date: January 21, 2007 at 23:35:40 Pacific
Reply:

Yeah, you could sys it with the bootdisk but the other dos files would still be ver. 4 and may not run without adding them all to the setver command.


0

Response Number 5
Name: Hakemon
Date: January 21, 2007 at 23:40:48 Pacific
Reply:

my bootdisk has a bunch of DOS files, i'll just use Windows
3.0 on it and copy and replace them all...

IW2EVK: There is no way that this computer can boot a
FreeDOS installation, I've tried, I just get a blank screen and
it haults (not to mention, I don't think that'll work with
Win30..)


0

Related Posts

See More



Response Number 6
Name: Mike Newcomb
Date: January 21, 2007 at 23:42:27 Pacific
Reply:


Go for version 6.2x

Check out the SYS command and then copy the
rest of the files.

Due to the smal capacity floppy it may be best to use PKZIP for copying which compresses the files and spans floppies.

Good Luck. Keep us posted.



0

Response Number 7
Name: Hakemon
Date: January 21, 2007 at 23:46:58 Pacific
Reply:

DOS 6 don't boot on this system either..


0

Response Number 8
Name: orbital
Date: January 22, 2007 at 02:50:48 Pacific
Reply:

"DOS 6 don't boot on this system either.."

I ran M$-DOS 6.22 happily on a 8086 Amstrad IBM Clone, so maybe you have other problems ??


0

Response Number 9
Name: wizard-fred
Date: January 22, 2007 at 03:10:21 Pacific
Reply:

What is the density of the floppies of your model 25?


0

Response Number 10
Name: Hakemon
Date: January 22, 2007 at 09:08:07 Pacific
Reply:

they are 720KB drives.. i used a 720KB DOS 6.22 disk, it just
plain refused to boot it..


0

Response Number 11
Name: Mechanix2Go
Date: January 22, 2007 at 09:19:32 Pacific
Reply:

Did it act like the drive did a seek and settle and attempt to read? Will it boot a DOS 4/5x 720K?


=====================================
If at first you don't succeed, you're about average.

M2



0

Response Number 12
Name: Hakemon
Date: January 22, 2007 at 10:42:22 Pacific
Reply:

yes, at first it attempted to, then it left a long BEEEEEEEEEP, then quit..


0

Response Number 13
Name: Mechanix2Go
Date: January 22, 2007 at 10:56:00 Pacific
Reply:

If it's trying to load himem, that might bomb the boot. Try renaming config.sys & autoexec.bat


=====================================
If at first you don't succeed, you're about average.

M2



0

Response Number 14
Name: Hakemon
Date: January 22, 2007 at 11:06:59 Pacific
Reply:

I know it's not himem.sys, cause when I boot DOS 5 on it, (which the boot disk tried to load), it did give a beep, then gave a message saying it required an 80x86, and the driver wouldn't be installed (then it continued booting fine)..

Remember, this old PC has "two" BIOS's, so it might be conflicting with the "ABIOS"...


0

Response Number 15
Name: Hakemon
Date: January 22, 2007 at 14:19:19 Pacific
Reply:

ok, got DOS 6.22 booting.. it was a "my bad" type of thing
XD

I was formatting it as 720K on my Domain Controller (only
computer in my house that has a floppy on a modern PC),
and I forgot to tape over the media sense hole...


0

Response Number 16
Name: Hakemon
Date: January 22, 2007 at 14:50:53 Pacific
Reply:

argh, spoke too soon..

I can no longer use MS-EDIT.. I get "run-time error R6003 -
integer divide by 0" now...


0

Response Number 17
Name: DAVEINCAPS
Date: January 22, 2007 at 16:57:51 Pacific
Reply:

If you're using a 6.22 bootdisk (or sys'd the HD with 6.22) and are running EDIT or other commands from the older 4.0 dos, that may be the problem.


0

Response Number 18
Name: Hakemon
Date: January 22, 2007 at 17:23:08 Pacific
Reply:

both EDITs, from DOS 5, and DOS 6, will not run..


0

Response Number 19
Name: SkipCox
Date: January 22, 2007 at 18:08:13 Pacific
Reply:

Make sure QBASIC.exe in on your boot disk if you want to run EDIT...it must be in the same directory.

Skip


0

Response Number 20
Name: Hakemon
Date: January 22, 2007 at 18:35:38 Pacific
Reply:

I thought QBASIC relied on EDIT, not the other way around...


0

Response Number 21
Name: CoffeeBreak
Date: January 22, 2007 at 19:56:31 Pacific
Reply:

The following is from “help edit” at an MS-DOS6.22 prompt, then at the bottom of the page.

“CAUTION: MS-DOS Editor does not work if the file QBASIC.exe is not in the current directory or in the search path or in the same directory as the file EDIT.COM. If you delete QBASIC.exe to save space on your hard disk, you cannot use MS-DOS EDITOR.”

CoffeeBreak


0

Response Number 22
Name: Hakemon
Date: January 22, 2007 at 20:37:56 Pacific
Reply:

hmm ok, QBASIC is in the search path then (SET PATH=C:
\DOS)


0

Response Number 23
Name: SkipCox
Date: January 24, 2007 at 19:10:03 Pacific
Reply:

Just put QBASIC.exe on the boot disk...Edit.com should then work.

Skip


0

Response Number 24
Name: Hakemon
Date: January 25, 2007 at 13:06:14 Pacific
Reply:

it doesn't, i've tried it.. it don't give an error now, it just
hangs the computer...

being it used to work, and when i booted up DOS 5, it DID
work, DOS 6.22 seems to have damaged support for this
computer in some ways.. I might downgrade back to DOS
5...


0

Response Number 25
Name: os2fan2
Date: February 23, 2007 at 02:34:28 Pacific
Reply:

If you are upgrading the same kind of DOS (ie MS-DOS 3.x to 6.x, or PC-DOS 3.x to 7.x or Windows 9x, you can simply replace the DOS files on the hard drive. Don't forget the ibmbio.com/io.sys and ibmdos.com/msdos.sys.

If you are changing DOS types, you need to SYS the drive to install the new boot sector.

Otherwise, you pretty much can have several DOS from the same vendor, and simply replace the boot files (ibmbio.com, io.sys, ibmdos.com, msdos.sys, command.com, config.sys and autoexec.bat), as the need sees it.

The dream you dream alone is only a dream,
The dream we dream together is reality.


0

Sponsored Link
Ads by Google
Reply to Message Icon






Post Locked

This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.


Go to Disk Operating System Forum Home


Sponsored links

Ads by Google


Results for: Updating DOS?

restore file from dos 6.1 update www.computing.net/answers/dos/restore-file-from-dos-61-update/4077.html

Who likes dos? www.computing.net/answers/dos/who-likes-dos/4388.html

need command.com for dos 3.30 www.computing.net/answers/dos/need-commandcom-for-dos-330/9957.html