Computing.Net > Forums > Disk Operating System > fat 16 vs 32

Computer Problems? Computing.Net has over 1,000,000 posts about all things technology related! Over 90% answered within 24 hours! Click here to start participating now! Also, be sure to check out the New User Guide.

fat 16 vs 32

Reply to Message Icon

Name: lumberingox
Date: June 24, 2007 at 16:13:14 Pacific
OS: FreeDos 1.0
CPU/Ram: Pent 166
Product: Toshiba 300cds
Comment:

I just installed FreeDos 1.0 on my laptop. It works fine. However, I got fat 32 on the 2 gig drive as one partition. It seems that the disk utils like chkdsk, defrag only work for fat 16, or at least that is the message I get.

Should I reformat as fat16, or just the fat32. Also if I go with fat16, what is the max partition size I can go with, and will the long file setup still work.



Sponsored Link
Ads by Google

Response Number 1
Name: abdul_ahad
Date: June 24, 2007 at 17:53:00 Pacific
Reply:

FAT32 uses disk space more efficiently, because the cluster size is small.
However it is not accessible with any standalone version of MS-DOS, PC-DOS or DR-DOS.
However, FreeDOS and Enhanced DR-DOS can "understand" FAT32.
FAT16 is accessible to almost any version of DOS, WINDOWS. (Only the very old versions of DOS like MS-DOS 2.11) cannot see FAT16
Generally the maximum partition size for FAT16 is 2GB.
However, FreeDOS can format a FAT16 partition upto 4GB. Such a partition can be accessed only with
(1) FreeDOS
(2) Windows NT4 and upwards (i.e. 2000 and XP) do not know about Vista
(3) Enhanced DR-DOS

By the way, i would like to know what you hope to do with FreeDOS. Is it going to be used as a standalone OS?
my signature does not look like this


0

Response Number 2
Name: lumberingox
Date: June 24, 2007 at 19:55:52 Pacific
Reply:

It will be the only OS I plan for this computer. As my plans with the computer. I will just use to to read some pdf's, and off line html, do some spreadsheet stuff, play some mp3's if I can get it to work. I have another machine for internet stuff.

So as I understand it from your message, going to fat16 would allow chkdsk and defrag to work, and I wouldn't actually lose anything, as 2 gigs is actually way to much anyways ;)

I wish I didn't toss my copies of "Clash of Steel" and "Age of Rifles"


0

Sponsored Link
Ads by Google
Reply to Message Icon

Related Posts

See More







Post Locked

This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.


Go to Disk Operating System Forum Home


Sponsored links

Ads by Google


Results for: fat 16 vs 32

Fat 16 www.computing.net/answers/dos/fat-16/16157.html

i need DETAILED info on FAT 16 www.computing.net/answers/dos/i-need-detailed-info-on-fat-16/1975.html

Dos 5 system for Fat 16 www.computing.net/answers/dos/dos-5-system-for-fat-16/14933.html