Dos is not dead

Original Message

Name: rogerashley
Date: March 23, 2005 at 10:51:39 Pacific
Subject: Dos is not dead
OS: DOS FAT16
CPU/Ram: Various

Comment:

http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=22049

Report Offensive Message For Removal

Response Number 1

Name: SkipCox
Date: March 23, 2005 at 12:35:48 Pacific
Subject: Dos is not dead

Reply: (edit)

Roger,
How the hell do you find this stuff?
Skip

Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 2

Name: tvkleef
Date: March 23, 2005 at 12:38:23 Pacific
Subject: Dos is not dead

Reply: (edit)

Nice joke. MS-DOS 3.3 I presume?
Btw, still love to work with 6.22.

Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 3

Name: Valerie (by Garibaldi)
Date: March 23, 2005 at 14:02:04 Pacific
Subject: Dos is not dead

Reply: (edit)

DOS is neither dead nor dying - still work with 6.22 and 7.10 - yet to experiencre a Dos crash!

Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 4

Name: rogerashley
Date: March 23, 2005 at 16:55:39 Pacific
Subject: Dos is not dead

Reply: (edit)

Obviously some people did not get the joke?
LoL
DO NOT SHOOT THE MESSENGER

Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 5

Name: Richard Bonner
Date: March 30, 2005 at 10:54:45 Pacific
Subject: Dos is not dead

Reply: (edit)

DOS is great. I upgraded from Windows and
will never look back. I recommend DR-DOS
7.03 and updated commands like XXCOPY, XSET,
ANSIPLUS, XMDDISK, etc.
See my DOS website:
www.chebucto.ns.ca/~ak621/DOS/

Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal


What is DOS' role in Win95/98? My Hard Drive is not recognized! DOS is not working Welcome to PhoenixOS Can a batch file count directories?	Command-Line dos editor is not open file cdrom is not recognized by dos or window DOS ain't dead! MS-DOS is DEAD - Long live MS-DOS