Computing.Net > Forums > Disk Operating System > DOS & XP is slow!

Computer Problems? Computing.Net has over 1,000,000 posts about all things technology related! Over 90% answered within 24 hours! Click here to start participating now! Also, be sure to check out the New User Guide.

DOS & XP is slow!

Reply to Message Icon

Name: JavaToad
Date: July 1, 2003 at 03:12:05 Pacific
OS: Windows XP
CPU/Ram: AMD athlon / 128M
Comment:

I upgraded from Win ME to XP a few years back and dos's response to commands like dir has always been fast. Now after formatting my hard drive and doing a fresh install with Win XP Dos's respose to commands is REALLY slow. Does anyone know how to I can fix this lethargic response?



Sponsored Link
Ads by Google

Response Number 1
Name: Mick C
Date: July 1, 2003 at 04:02:08 Pacific
Reply:

Windows XP only uses emulated DOS. It does not have the real thing at all. The slowness is in the emulation passing commands to XP, XP processing them and returning the results back to the emulated DOS window.


0

Response Number 2
Name: Secret_Doom
Date: July 1, 2003 at 07:41:35 Pacific
Reply:

Yeah, there's no DOS under Windows XP, just some sort of emulation. But such thing is not a general problem with Windows XP. Such commands generate pretty fast (immediate) responses on my computer, also running Windows XP.

However, such OS requires a fairly good CPU and RAM. You mentioned you upgraded your computer from WinME. Perhaps the computer is a little bit too slow for Windows XP's demands... My computer is a Pentium III 700MHz with 384MB RAM. Windows XP runs fine here, but if you have a computer below that things could get slow.

Try asking on the Windows XP forum.

-- Leonardo Pignataro - Secret_Doom --

secret_doom@hotmail.com
www.batch.hpg.com.br


0

Response Number 3
Name: Secret_Doom
Date: July 1, 2003 at 13:44:12 Pacific
Reply:

By the way, this "DOS emulation" we've mentioned is made by using a command interpreter. The primary command interpreter from Windows XP is CMD.exe. However, COMMAND.COM is also avaliable, I don't know why.

You should use CMD.EXE, since Windows XP's COMMAND.COM is indeed slow.

-- Leonardo Pignataro - Secret_Doom --

secret_doom@hotmail.com
www.batch.hpg.com.br


0

Response Number 4
Name: Mick C
Date: July 1, 2003 at 15:18:50 Pacific
Reply:

Thanks for pointing out the memory Leonardo. I notice JavaToad says 128MB which is on the low side. 256MB at least would be better.

As to speed I cannot say since mostly I use Windows 98se. My wife has an XP based PC which while fast is not a slick as my 98se on a simerlar spec PC.


0

Response Number 5
Name: jujitsucyle
Date: July 3, 2003 at 15:11:24 Pacific
Reply:

this is true. xp is a bit clunky on older systems. but it can run responsively, i even have xp on a tecra 8000 p2 366mhz laptop. and the command prompt is pretty responsive on it. how slow are we talking?? the command prompt on the 366mhz responds within a second.


0

Related Posts

See More



Sponsored Link
Ads by Google
Reply to Message Icon






Post Locked

This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.


Go to Disk Operating System Forum Home


Sponsored links

Ads by Google


Results for: DOS & XP is slow!

XP,DOS: inv drv spcf (for c:) www.computing.net/answers/dos/xpdos-inv-drv-spcf-for-c/14913.html

Networking DOS to XP www.computing.net/answers/dos/networking-dos-to-xp/13635.html

How do you get dos on XP OS www.computing.net/answers/dos/how-do-you-get-dos-on-xp-os/9408.html