Computing.Net > Forums > CPUs/Overclocking > which is better overclocker?

Computer Problems? Computing.Net has over 1,000,000 posts about all things technology related! Over 90% answered within 24 hours! Click here to start participating now! Also, be sure to check out the New User Guide.

which is better overclocker?

Reply to Message Icon

Name: litz (by don)
Date: March 18, 2006 at 09:02:15 Pacific
OS: win xp
CPU/Ram: none
Comment:

athlon 64 3000+ or 3200+ ?



Sponsored Link
Ads by Google

Response Number 1
Name: TMP-Man
Date: March 18, 2006 at 09:05:25 Pacific
Reply:

Are those venice core? If yes, then both should turn out to be the same except 3000+ will have higher FSB than 3200+ after overclocked...


TMP-Man

Asus P5P800-SE
Pentium 4 506 2.66Ghz @ 4000Mhz @ 1.5125v
1024MB Dual Channel DDR400
40GB 5400RPM + 120GB 7200RPM HD
128MB Radoen 9500 mod 9700 @ 360/585


0

Response Number 2
Name: jam
Date: March 18, 2006 at 09:08:32 Pacific
Reply:

essentially correct, except that there is no FSB


0

Response Number 3
Name: TMP-Man
Date: March 18, 2006 at 09:24:44 Pacific
Reply:

Correction, higher HTT...

TMP-Man

Asus P5P800-SE
Pentium 4 506 2.66Ghz @ 4000Mhz @ 1.5125v
1024MB Dual Channel DDR400
40GB 5400RPM + 120GB 7200RPM HD
128MB Radoen 9500 mod 9700 @ 360/585


0

Response Number 4
Name: jam
Date: March 18, 2006 at 09:25:51 Pacific
Reply:

LOL...that's better ;)


0

Response Number 5
Name: litz (by don)
Date: March 18, 2006 at 10:47:14 Pacific
Reply:

so is best getting the 3000+ venice? olso, i will b getting cosair valueselect ram pc3200... will that be a problem if i want to overclock?


0

Related Posts

See More



Response Number 6
Name: jam
Date: March 18, 2006 at 11:20:10 Pacific
Reply:

What make/model motherboard?


0

Response Number 7
Name: litz (by don)
Date: March 18, 2006 at 11:42:08 Pacific
Reply:

this :

http://www.computing.net/gaming/wwwboard/forum/6580.html


0

Response Number 8
Name: jam
Date: March 18, 2006 at 15:16:19 Pacific
Reply:

The overclocking tragedy for an A64 is totally different than with previous AMD or current Intel platforms. You don't *have* to overclock the RAM...there is no FSB, so the RAM & CPU don't necessarily have to run in sync. If you can do it, great...if not, the performance hit isn't huge. Running tighter timings is more important.

With that board & CPU, you should be able to get the CPU frequency up to 250-300MHz. To be able to run in sync with the CPU, you'd need PC4000 (DDR500) or PC4800 (DDR600) & that would cost 2-3 times as much as Corsair PC3200.


0

Response Number 9
Name: jam
Date: March 20, 2006 at 05:33:59 Pacific
Reply:

"The overclocking tragedy...."

Oooops...I meant "strategy"


0

Sponsored Link
Ads by Google
Reply to Message Icon






Post Locked

This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.


Go to CPUs/Overclocking Forum Home


Sponsored links

Ads by Google


Results for: which is better overclocker?

which is better AGP or PCI Ex. www.computing.net/answers/cpus/which-is-better-agp-or-pci-ex/12325.html

which is better? www.computing.net/answers/cpus/which-is-better/13080.html

which is better www.computing.net/answers/cpus/which-is-better/15150.html