Computing.Net > Forums > CPUs/Overclocking > what is vcore??

Computing.Net: Over 1,000,000 posts about all things technology related! Over 90% answered within 24 hours! Click here to sign up now, it's free!

what is vcore??

Reply to Message Icon

Original Message
Name: paulkbyun
Date: November 13, 2003 at 19:05:56 Pacific
Subject: what is vcore??
OS: XP PRO
CPU/Ram: 3.2G P4/ 2GB PC3200 DDR D
Comment:

I'm sorry, john or adam, what is vcore..and can u change multiplier? it is set to 16 maybe 14 or 13 and raise frequency to like 250mhz or 266?? I could not change multiplier maybe I don't know how??
when I try to raise just cpu frequency I can only go up to around 3.34ghz,,, is that it? or can I increase CPU's Voltage or ram... or disabling HT??? OR instead of setting at lsp1 or hwp? not sure of code...settinf a dram speed cas latency time, active to precharge, dram ras #to cas delay, now it is set to default 2.5-7-4-4 .... and if I connect to raid my WD hd, how to boot? It kept giving me indication that I'll lose all the data when I try to change array at high point raid configuration... And I like to study this so I can let you guys know how it come out. Is raid 0 setting will run system faster than just put in ide mode right? I'm so new to this set up..
thanks guys..



Report Offensive Message For Removal


Response Number 1
Name: johnoh
Date: November 13, 2003 at 19:43:10 Pacific
Reply: (edit)

Most computer questions posted here can be answered easily, but questions in the area of "how to overclock", just can't. To do it safely requires a lot of learning first. In your case, more vcore (voltage to the cpu) will probably help, but only a little, and it brings in risk of damage that you'll need to oversee as an expert. So take a few days just to search and research the topic, is my suggestion.

Generally, vcore adjustments bring more risk than reward. So maybe its best to stick with 3.3g. You might try a memory ratio that keeps the memory no higher than the 200mhz its rated for.

You can't change the multiplier.



Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 2
Name: Adam
Date: November 13, 2003 at 20:29:58 Pacific
Reply: (edit)

Johnoh has covered everything I can think of, so I'll just second the above motion :)


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 3
Name: paulkbyun
Date: November 13, 2003 at 20:39:35 Pacific
Reply: (edit)

Thanks guys.. and i will give you update...


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal







Post Locked

This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.


Go to CPUs/Overclocking Forum Home








Do you have your own blog?

Yes
No
I did before
I will soon


View Results

Poll Finishes Today.
Discuss in The Lounge
Poll History




Data Recovery Software