Computing.Net > Forums > CPUs/Overclocking > Technical Question on O/S and OC

Computing.Net: Over 1,000,000 posts about all things technology related! Over 90% answered within 24 hours! Click here to sign up now, it's free!

Technical Question on O/S and OC

Reply to Message Icon

Original Message
Name: MUNKY
Date: November 17, 2003 at 15:07:59 Pacific
Subject: Technical Question on O/S and OC
OS: win ME -> win XP?umm..
CPU/Ram: 750 mhz -> XP2500+
Comment:

Ok, I am starting a new thread to avoid cross topics.

I am receiving a new XP 2500+ and A7N8X ASUS mobo.

Would it be the best of interest of stability sake by leaving O/C at last and install the XP O/S first?

Umm, guess I answered my own question. What do you all think?


Report Offensive Message For Removal


Response Number 1
Name: real_cool
Date: November 17, 2003 at 15:12:15 Pacific
Reply: (edit)

Humm, it makes sense, doesn't it. It even sounds logical.


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 2
Name: Adam
Date: November 17, 2003 at 15:18:56 Pacific
Reply: (edit)

I think I'll second the above motion.


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 3
Name: Gagey
Date: November 17, 2003 at 15:23:52 Pacific
Reply: (edit)

Definitely install OS first!
U need software to run to see if your OC settings r stable and/or to run a benchmark.
I have same board (Deluxe ver) and the Asus Utility software that comes bundled is INDESPENSIBLE when OCing. It has a great feature of allowing u to record the monitors (CPU/Mobo temp, Voltages etc) so u can see how the temp is effected by your OC.
Ii may help u to know what I OCed my XP2400+ to:
I leave the Mem setting to Auto and gradually increase the External clock until the RAM timings pre-charge CAS etc jump above 6-2-2-2.5 and then drop it back to get these figures again. 139Mhz is highest I get here (DDR333 RAM). I find this gives best RAM benchmark under Sandra (compared to manual setting of the RAM to higher clock and higher CAS etc)
Then start bumping up the CPU multiplier. I get 16.5 no probs (15.0 default) which gives me 2.3GHz (2.01 default). U may need to increase the CPU voltage a little.

To get the full range of ext. clock speeds u need to set 'System Performance' to 'User Define' in BIOS (if u don't u only see about 5 clk rates) and set everything else to 'Aggressive' where possible. I found leaving Mem on Auto does give the best performance.

1 more thing. DON'T use the cooler that comes with the XP chip! Get a better one (pure copper base) and use a good dolop of Arctic Silver heat compound between fan base and CPU core (This alone makes an xtra -3 deg difference on my machine!)


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 4
Name: MUNKY
Date: November 18, 2003 at 09:19:36 Pacific
Reply: (edit)

Thank you Gagey. You must be a happier then a pig in s--- no? :P

Seriously, I am upgrading to WIN XP. Just a matter of time right? Well, new pc, new O/S.

Not that I want to, but since my effort in preserving my old WIN ME will only cause issues later on.

So forget all that garbage and move on to a new frontier

... AND IF WIN XP is not as good as everyone claims to be, I am going to be really bogged.


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal







Post Locked

This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.


Go to CPUs/Overclocking Forum Home








Do you have your own blog?

Yes
No
I did before
I will soon


View Results

Poll Finishes Today.
Discuss in The Lounge
Poll History




Data Recovery Software