|
| Computing.Net: Over 1,000,000 posts about all things technology related! Over 90% answered within 24 hours! Click here to sign up now, it's free! |
Slow pc even after upgrade
|
Original Message
|
Name: InnocentChild
Date: October 24, 2005 at 02:20:57 Pacific
Subject: Slow pc even after upgradeOS: XP sp2CPU/Ram: 2.8ghz 512mb ram |
Comment: I've been using a Pentium III for the past few months and now i've just upgrated to a P4 2.8ghz HT. I was looking for a 3.2ghz but it was kinda outta my budget so i settled for this one. The problem is i can't see the difference in speed from the P III. When i play GTA San Andreas it still plays at the slow sluggish speed even with 9250 ATI Radeon 128mb. How can i increase the speed??
Report Offensive Message For Removal
|
|
Response Number 1
|
Name: indigian
Date: October 24, 2005 at 04:56:16 Pacific
|
Reply: (edit)Games are basically graphics card domain not CPU although a faster CPU can and does increase quality/frame rates. Upgraded to a P4? Same mobo? Have you set the bios right? Tt Lanfire MSI K8N Diamond AMD64 3000+'Venice' 1gb pc4400 OCZ Powerstream 520w 6600GT WDCaviar 160gb sata x2;~}
Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal
|
|
Response Number 2
|
Name: jam
Date: October 24, 2005 at 05:35:29 Pacific
|
Reply: (edit)"still plays at the slow sluggish speed even with 9250 ATI Radeon 128mb" Who ever told you the Radeon 9250 is a good card? Most of them use 64-bit memory & are not great for gaming. You could also add another 512MB RAM. ASUS A7N8X-X Athlon XP 1800+ 8.5 x 200MHz 1024MB PC3200 2.5-3-3-7 Asus A9550GE/TD 128MB WinME/WinXP Pro SP2
Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal
|
|
Response Number 3
|
Name: jackbomb
Date: October 24, 2005 at 19:20:30 Pacific
|
Reply: (edit)The radeon 9250 is a poor excuse for a gaming card. FX-57 @ 3.1ghz 4GB of OCZ PC-4200 500GBx4 drive array Sapphire X850 XT-PE Fujitsu 1920x1080 projector
Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal
|
|
Response Number 4
|
Name: Fel
Date: October 24, 2005 at 19:54:36 Pacific
|
Reply: (edit)9250 is a slow card. mainly used for office work and standard game. like... insaniquarium, or popcap games. better upgrade your memory. or your VGA card. both if possible. Athlon 64 2800+ @ 2.63 Ghz Stock Cooling Timings:2-3-2-5 V-Gen 512MB pc3200 DFI Lanparty UT NF3 Abit R9550 VGuru XTurbo 525Mhz/300Mhz
Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal
|
|
Response Number 5
|
|
Reply: (edit)Ok, Ok i get it, it's not the best card out there but hey it's got 500mhz of clock core speed ok that should be enough to play standard games such as NFS2, GTA and a few others. Somehow i don't think the bios is set right, can someone give me some tips, pleeeease, and about cheap but good graphics cards??
Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal
|
|
Response Number 6
|
Name: TMP-Man
Date: October 24, 2005 at 23:50:51 Pacific
|
Reply: (edit)Have you reformat your hard drive and reinstall windows after upgrade?? If you upgrade from P3 to P4, I assume u have a different motherboard and different chipset... Also make sure you have the latest driver for all.... Also for GTA San Andreas, it has this special video display setting (Frame Limit = On "30fps Max" and if u turn it off, u can get pass 30fps barrier... Are you using a AGP or PCI radeon 9250? TMP-ManAsus A7V classic rev 1.05 Athlon XP 2100+ @ 101x20 1.75v 768MB PC133 RAM @ 134Mhz 2-2-2 40GB 5400RPM + 120GB 7200RPM HD 128MB Geforce FX5200 128bit
Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal
|
|
Response Number 7
|
Name: Free Weasel
Date: October 25, 2005 at 03:58:53 Pacific
|
Reply: (edit)Sorry to say so but a high core clock doesn't mean you get good graphic. As an example a 6800GT works with a GPU clock of 350MHz and a 6600GT with 500MHz. Still the 6800GT is up to twice as fast as the 6600GT. The reason is a differently build GPU and that of the 6800GT is a lot more powerful. The problem is that the Radeon 9250 is as bad for gaming as a FX5200 and if you ot the 9250SE it's even worse. An old TI4200 would be a lot faster than the 9250 you have. The only problem is that the TI4200 only works with DirectX8.1 and so there's no warranty you're able to play the newest games! Actual games are 95 to 99% graphiccard oriented so the graphic card does nearly all the work. Example1: I occed my Athlon64 3000+ from 1800MHz to 2700MHz (=50%) but in 3DMark 05 I only got 3% more points with my 6600GT because that benchmark is as graphic oriented as the actual games. Example2: In the first months of 2004 I got a FX5900XT to replace the old Geforce2 GTS in my old Athlon Thunderbird 1,2@1,33GHz system (512MB SD Ram) and suddenly I was able to play NFSU2 and other games I barely made the minimal cpu requirements smoothly at 1280x1024 pixels at full or nearly full graphic! If you invested into a good graphic card instead of the CPU/Board upgrade you might have been able to play the game in better quality. About a cheap upgrade I just choose a Nvidia 6200 to upgrade an old Pentium3 866MHz but I ran into trouble because the card produces graphic errors and also crashes in the above mentioned Athlon system after maximal 10 to 15 minutes with every game! Better don't try that. I think I try to get a Radeon 9550 or 9600 as replacement!
Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal
|
|
Response Number 8
|
Name: doug_brit
Date: October 25, 2005 at 06:57:28 Pacific
|
Reply: (edit)The only current game that rely's mostly on CPU rather than GPU is The sims 2, otherwise games love powerful graphics cards. If you want to see a noticable increase I'd say you should upgrade somewhere in the range of the X600XT or X700. Doug Windows Xp Pro x64 AMD Sempron 3000+ 1.8ghz 1 Gig Ram pc2700 Nforce 4 Motherboard Radeon X700 256mb Realtek Ac 97 Onboard Audio Thermaltake 430W Power Supply
Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal
|
|
Response Number 9
|
|
Reply: (edit)To answer TMP-Man's question, yes i did reinstall windows and the card that i have is AGP. The thing is the pentium 3 that i had had an AGP slot that only supported 4x and now that the new board supports up to 8x, i just thought that it would be a bit more faster, especially with 512mb or ram that i have as suppose to the 320 that i had in the P3:-(. Anyway i guess pretty soon i'm gonna have to get me an x700 then, or atleast a 9600, if it's recommended!!. One last question that i have is, what actually makes a graphics card good for gaming, memory, core speed, GPU, what is it axactly??
Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal
|
|
Response Number 10
|
Name: indigian
Date: October 26, 2005 at 01:19:00 Pacific
|
Reply: (edit)It's a mix of what you said and lots of pipelines. Tt Lanfire MSI K8N Diamond AMD64 3000+'Venice' 1gb pc4400 OCZ Powerstream 520w 6600GT WDCaviar 160gb sata x2;~}
Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal
|

Post Locked
This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.
Go to CPUs/Overclocking Forum Home
|
|
|