Computing.Net > Forums > CPUs/Overclocking > Revisiting: Celeron vs. Centrino

Computer Problems? Computing.Net has over 1,000,000 posts about all things technology related! Over 90% answered within 24 hours! Click here to start participating now! Also, be sure to check out the New User Guide.

Revisiting: Celeron vs. Centrino

Reply to Message Icon

Name: Gord
Date: May 25, 2006 at 13:42:15 Pacific
OS: Windows XP
CPU/Ram: see message
Product: HP
Comment:

New to this. Buying my first notebook -- an HP Pavilion. A choice between two identical models, except for the following:

1)1.7GHz Centrino with 2MB L2 cache
2)1.6GHz Celeron with 1MB L2 cache

I save $200 by selecting the Celeron model. Considering that I'm not a gamer, are there still significant advantages to selecting the Centrino model?

Thanks for cluing me in.

Gord



Sponsored Link
Ads by Google

Response Number 1
Name: AdamNelson
Date: May 25, 2006 at 15:47:44 Pacific
Reply:

Centrino is not a processor. It's basically Microsoft's way of saying that it's a Pentium M with some wireless networking of some sort. I'm not sure. Performance wise, everyday tasks will be slightly faster with the Centrino, but if you want a laptop to do some light surfing, word processing and/or DVD watching, then go for the Celeron and save some money. I have a Celeron 1.4 Gateway and it definitely gets the job done. I watch movies all the time on it skip-free!

Make sure that the Celeron model has some form of WiFi if you plan on wireless networking, though.


I wish my lawn was emo so it would cut itself.


0

Response Number 2
Name: jackbomb
Date: May 25, 2006 at 16:19:48 Pacific
Reply:

Actually, it's Intel's way of saying it's a Pentium M with wireless networking & accompanying chipset.

If you're not a gamer, pick the Celeron. Really, in P6 style chips such as the PIII and Pentium M (The Celeron M is just a cut down version of the P-M) cache doesn't matter nearly as much as it does on a Netburst style chip such as the P4. 1MB of L2 on the Celeron M is enough. In fact, a Celeron M and Pentium M are almost the same performance-wise; it's usually cheaper parts on the laptop that seem to make Celeron M models slower, such as slower RAM and integrated graphics. Since you're not gaming though, this won't matter.


0

Response Number 3
Name: Cobra_R
Date: May 25, 2006 at 20:50:26 Pacific
Reply:

It wouldn't matter if you are gaming or not when it comes to Centrino or Celeron M. If you don't have a decent graphics engine in there and you are willing to spend at least 1500 on a laptop for that reason they it's pretty useless in terms of games. ATI x200 or 945g graphics engine in a laptop isn't going to cut it if you want a gaming laptop.

AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+ OC 2.7ghz
2GB Dual Channel DDR 3200
Nvidia 7800GT
SATA II 2x 200gig 7200rpm 16mb cache RAID-0
Gigabyte Nforce 4 SLI



0

Response Number 4
Name: Gord
Date: May 26, 2006 at 07:31:20 Pacific
Reply:

All -- Much appreciated, thanks.


0

Response Number 5
Name: AdamNelson
Date: May 26, 2006 at 09:32:50 Pacific
Reply:

It's basically Microsoft's way of saying that it's a Pentium M with some wireless networking of some sort.


My mistake... I meant Intel

I wish my lawn was emo so it would cut itself.


0

Related Posts

See More



Sponsored Link
Ads by Google
Reply to Message Icon






Post Locked

This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.


Go to CPUs/Overclocking Forum Home


Sponsored links

Ads by Google


Results for: Revisiting: Celeron vs. Centrino

Pentium M vs Celeron M www.computing.net/answers/cpus/pentium-m-vs-celeron-m/10977.html

Celeron M vs Centrino www.computing.net/answers/cpus/celeron-m-vs-centrino/9760.html

intel celeron vs intel centrino www.computing.net/answers/cpus/intel-celeron-vs-intel-centrino/15356.html