Computing.Net > Forums > CPUs/Overclocking > Read this plzzzzzzz

Computer Problems? Computing.Net has over 1,000,000 posts about all things technology related! Over 90% answered within 24 hours! Click here to start participating now! Also, be sure to check out the New User Guide.

Read this plzzzzzzz

Reply to Message Icon

Name: jason
Date: September 21, 2002 at 01:58:17 Pacific
OS: WIN XP PRO
CPU/Ram: athlon xp 1600+/1ghzsdram
Comment:

ok im overclocking my athlon xp 1600+ i have the fsb at 143 really it supposed to be at 133 then i have my ration at 12X it supposed to be at 10.5 and i have my core volt at 1.8 ok when i play unreal tounament 2003 demo in the game comp comp reboots now what do i have to change to keep the speed i have u think i need a lil more core voltage to add or any other ideas i have 1 ghz of sdram to AND MY CPU TEMP IS 49 CELCSIOS




Sponsored Link
Ads by Google

Response Number 1
Name: Joni
Date: September 21, 2002 at 03:58:06 Pacific
Reply:

The fact is, some CPUs will not overclock as well as others. Does UT2003 still crash when you have the default settings loaded?

The CPU temp is fine though, unless it is a faulty CPU or it has been damaged on insertion.

Joni



0

Response Number 2
Name: jason
Date: September 21, 2002 at 04:51:39 Pacific
Reply:


no joni it works fine with the default settings its when i change the fsb and the ratio then it tweaks out


0

Response Number 3
Name: peter
Date: September 21, 2002 at 15:19:42 Pacific
Reply:

I would try an increase in voltage
slowly


0

Sponsored Link
Ads by Google
Reply to Message Icon

Related Posts

See More







Post Locked

This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.


Go to CPUs/Overclocking Forum Home


Sponsored links

Ads by Google


Results for: Read this plzzzzzzz

ALL you Homebuilders-read this www.computing.net/answers/cpus/all-you-homebuildersread-this/8859.html

e6850 .. am i reading this correct? www.computing.net/answers/cpus/e6850-am-i-reading-this-correct/14538.html

After reading this article. www.computing.net/answers/cpus/after-reading-this-article/9100.html