Computing.Net > Forums > CPUs/Overclocking > Question about Dual Core

Computer Problems? Computing.Net has over 1,000,000 posts about all things technology related! Over 90% answered within 24 hours! Click here to start participating now! Also, be sure to check out the New User Guide.

Question about Dual Core

Reply to Message Icon

Name: Greatgamer
Date: November 17, 2005 at 06:28:18 Pacific
OS: XP
CPU/Ram: AMD 3200
Comment:

Hello, so is the Dual Core much more powerful then the regular AMD 64 CPUs? Or are there restrictions like it not being able to run certain games or programs? Is this more for servers or something? Thanks



Sponsored Link
Ads by Google

Response Number 1
Name: INH
Date: November 17, 2005 at 07:15:52 Pacific
Reply:

For games, a single core (for running a single process at 100% capacity) is better. For situations where you are running multiple processes then dual core is better.


0

Response Number 2
Name: Greatgamer
Date: November 17, 2005 at 07:22:33 Pacific
Reply:

Hmm, I do both :( I game and I multitask.


0

Response Number 3
Name: INH
Date: November 17, 2005 at 07:44:19 Pacific
Reply:

Get an amd FX57 for ultimate gaming performance.
It's a single core chip, and it KICKS ASS !

If by multitask you mean any kind of mundane office internet or small server stuff (gaming server, one or two user TS), then it doesn't matter. Get the FX57. Otherwise I would go for the much cheaper athlon 64. ATM dual core on desktops is more of a fad than a serious performance issue.


0

Response Number 4
Name: jam
Date: November 17, 2005 at 08:17:48 Pacific
Reply:

"Get the FX57"

While I agree it's an excellent CPU, it costs over $1000. That's insane! Unless you're independently wealthy, it's a waste of money. And unless you truly need a dual core CPU, get either the 3200+ Venice or the 3700+ San Diego. Be aware that AMD will soon be changing the socket format & the new A64 will support DDR2, so there will probably be more prices drops (there was a drop within the past 2 weeks) on S939 CPUs in the not too distant future.

ASUS A7N8X-X
Athlon XP 1800+
8.5 x 200MHz
1024MB PC3200 2.5-3-3-7
Asus A9550GE/TD 128MB
WinME/WinXP Pro SP2


0

Response Number 5
Name: indigian
Date: November 18, 2005 at 04:35:40 Pacific
Reply:

Don't forget that the opteron is becoming a serious choice also.

Tt Lanfire
MSI K8N Diamond
AMD64 3000+'Venice'
1gb pc4400
OCZ Powerstream 520w
6600GT
WDCaviar 160gb sata x2

;~}


0

Related Posts

See More



Response Number 6
Name: InnocentChild
Date: November 21, 2005 at 02:13:20 Pacific
Reply:

I agree it's too pricey. I would rather wait for a week or two for the price to drop!!


0

Response Number 7
Name: Cobra_R
Date: November 23, 2005 at 23:24:11 Pacific
Reply:

Go out and get the S939 Opteron 64. Great value it runs at 2ghz, L1 64k, L2 1mb chace, plus you can overclock it to 2.9ghz on a fan cooled system. Not to mention it's only 190 bucks!



0

Sponsored Link
Ads by Google
Reply to Message Icon

DRAM Frequency to CPU Fre... A64 4000+ mobile=>fastest...



Post Locked

This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.


Go to CPUs/Overclocking Forum Home


Sponsored links

Ads by Google


Results for: Question about Dual Core

Clueless about dual core... www.computing.net/answers/cpus/clueless-about-dual-core/14159.html

stupid ?? on dual core.. PCs www.computing.net/answers/cpus/stupid-on-dual-core-pcs/14040.html

Quick question please dual core AMD www.computing.net/answers/cpus/quick-question-please-dual-core-amd/13028.html