Computing.Net > Forums > CPUs/Overclocking > Prescott 2.4E (HT or not HT)?

Computer Problems? Computing.Net has over 1,000,000 posts about all things technology related! Over 90% answered within 24 hours! Click here to start participating now! Also, be sure to check out the New User Guide.

Prescott 2.4E (HT or not HT)?

Reply to Message Icon

Name: awooga
Date: July 6, 2005 at 10:46:23 Pacific
OS: Windows XP Pro
CPU/Ram: P4 2.4E/1GB
Comment:

Can anybody tell me if the P4 Prescott 2.40E supports HT technology or not? If possible please provide link to information about this CPU which clearly supports your answer.

Cheers

Awooga



Sponsored Link
Ads by Google

Response Number 1
Name: wizard-ict
Date: July 6, 2005 at 15:44:12 Pacific
Reply:

Yes it does.
http://www.intel.com/cd/ids/developer/asmo-na/eng/43988.htm

Wizard ICT. Microsoft Certified Professional


0

Response Number 2
Name: zoltec
Date: July 6, 2005 at 15:44:38 Pacific
Reply:

Yes, it does. Not that it really matters, since "HT Tech" is just some useless gimmick. Sure it exists on paper, but theres no real world advantages.

http://www.mbx.com/p/intel/pentium_4_24e_ghz_ht/?t=t

Cheers.

アンドリュー


0

Response Number 3
Name: Dragon306
Date: July 6, 2005 at 16:12:38 Pacific
Reply:

they have answered you questions and provided the links, but i disagree with ^^^. Hyper Threading technology in Intel chip does actually improve performance over a chip of the same speed without HT, i have seen this first-hand...


0

Response Number 4
Name: anonproxy
Date: July 6, 2005 at 17:45:23 Pacific
Reply:

HT is an incremental improvement on super-threading, which was used in Xeon chips. Basically, the HT CPU can execute two threads at one time. HT specifically allows sharing of internal execution units to do this.

The problem arises when one thread wishes to dominate choke points in the core and cache. This problem *probably* occurs quite frequently in enduser applications because they are not usually threaded for performance but for responsiveness.

For example, you want your game to get as many fps as possible; you want your word app to load faster. These dominant processes do not split workloads across units, but rely heavily on a few threads. High-demand, resource-intensive threads will *probably* not perform well on an HT system (i.e. better than a non-HT system). They choke the optimization benefit.

What should perform better are servers and other applications that have many similar threads or anything with a more equally divided workload. The HT frontend should be able to use more of the pipeline at any given time with this kind of load.



0

Response Number 5
Name: pheonix991
Date: July 8, 2005 at 22:57:30 Pacific
Reply:

plus, if you have anything under win xp, it doesn't do a thing. verious types on linux supports hyperthreading also.

p4 3.0ghz @ 222X15=3330mhz
512mb pc3200 dual channel @222mhz
80gb wd hdd/40gb seagate when on linux
8x agp geforce 6200 @ 530/585can't unlock extra pipes. plz help if you can
Audigy 2 ZS<


0

Related Posts

See More



Sponsored Link
Ads by Google
Reply to Message Icon






Post Locked

This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.


Go to CPUs/Overclocking Forum Home


Sponsored links

Ads by Google


Results for: Prescott 2.4E (HT or not HT)?

FSB above 1000 or not www.computing.net/answers/cpus/fsb-above-1000-or-not/13711.html

good or not www.computing.net/answers/cpus/good-or-not/12069.html

Prescott 2.8E Slow Hot Potato www.computing.net/answers/cpus/prescott-28e-slow-hot-potato/9078.html