Computing.Net > Forums > CPUs/Overclocking > OC'ing Athlon 64 3000+

Computing.Net: Over 1,000,000 posts about all things technology related! Over 90% answered within 24 hours! Click here to sign up now, it's free!

OC'ing Athlon 64 3000+

Reply to Message Icon

Original Message
Name: ccpeterman
Date: March 6, 2006 at 18:13:38 Pacific
Subject: OC'ing Athlon 64 3000+
OS: XP Pro
CPU/Ram: Athlon 3000+/1024Mb Pc320
Model/Manufacturer: Custom
Comment:

I'm overclocking an Athlon 64 3000+ venice core. Right now I've got it running at 2.26ghz from 1.8. Under a full load it tops out at 35c/95f. My question to you is this, AMD specifies that max temp for my cpu is ~45-65 I think. Does this mean some max out at 45 and others at 65? If so, how close can I get to 45 safely?

Nothing's broken until you choose not to fix it.


Report Offensive Message For Removal


Response Number 1
Name: phazion
Date: March 6, 2006 at 19:09:13 Pacific
Reply: (edit)

Well you shouldnt try to get near that at all you really dont know if the chip is running hotter then it is reporting... play is safe and dont try to fry your cpu.

E=MHZ


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 2
Name: TMP-Man
Date: March 6, 2006 at 22:06:27 Pacific
Reply: (edit)

The max temperature for Athlon64 should be around 70C (http://forums.pcper.com/showthread.php?t=328445)... If you have 35C full load, plenty room to go. But one very important thing to mention is that not to add more than 1.75v for your athlon64, else you will burn out ur CPU even though your temperature is extremely low. It's possible that the transistor inside gets blown even though the temperature is low under beyond absolute max voltage...

TMP-Man

Asus P5P800-SE
Pentium 506 2.66Ghz @ 4000Mhz @ 1.5125v
Intel Boxed Cooler with Arctic Silver 5 added 55C idle 2000RPM 66C full load @ 4300RPM MEGA VACCUM SOUND OMG!!!!
1024MB Dual C


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 3
Name: Sabertooth
Date: March 6, 2006 at 22:55:16 Pacific
Reply: (edit)

Much like the P4's, you can't burn up or "fry" the A64's because of the hardware-enforced thermal protection mechanism built into those CPU's.

The Athlon 64 has an on-die thermal probe for accurate temperature monitoring, so when and if the processor’s die temperature exceeds a specified threshold, the processor by design stops its internal clocks heat damage.

When Google isn't your best pal


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 4
Name: ccpeterman
Date: March 7, 2006 at 10:49:33 Pacific
Reply: (edit)

thanks guys. I havent even touched the voltages yet...no need to atm.

Nothing's broken until you choose not to fix it.


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 5
Name: ccpeterman
Date: March 9, 2006 at 11:22:22 Pacific
Reply: (edit)

I'm up to 2.4ghz now @ +.025v. It seems to be runnin a bit skitchy at times. Some things pause before loading up (things that shouldnt take a pause such as right clicking on the desktop.) whats goin on? current settings are 267 x 9 w/ mem at 400mhz and fsb at 3x (801.) temp under full load for 2 hours is 37c/98f.
Cooling in my system is 2 120mm fans 1 front 1 rear and a 120mm fan in my 500w atrix psu.

Nothing's broken until you choose not to fix it.


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal


Response Number 6
Name: Ron (by aarongroves103)
Date: March 17, 2006 at 12:38:49 Pacific
Reply: (edit)

I dont think a liquid cooled system would allow the internal clock to be raised much more than 3000 mhz, and for the cost of the water cooling kit there is no point. Lets face it overclocking is trying to get something for free, so why pay £100 for a water cooling kit when you could get a 64 bit porcessor with 1mb chashe for the price of that kit. Dont bother, just get a good stock cooler and be happy with what you got.


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 7
Name: ccpeterman
Date: March 18, 2006 at 22:32:59 Pacific
Reply: (edit)

who said anything about water cooling? I want to get the most out of my hardware with the cooling i have. What i have is plenty sufficient the trick for me is the settings and such. BTW going from 1.8 to 3.0ghz is more than i had in mind. I assumed 2.6-2.8 max and i'd even settle for 2.4 if i could get it working properly.

Nothing's broken until you choose not to fix it.


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 8
Name: ccpeterman
Date: March 27, 2006 at 11:10:53 Pacific
Reply: (edit)

Got it working properly at 2.4 with 300x8 rather than 267x9 with the .025 v increase. also added a 512 stick of pc2700 running at 400mhz w/ 3-3-3-8 timings.

Nothing's broken until you choose not to fix it.


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal






Post Locked

This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.


Go to CPUs/Overclocking Forum Home








Do you own an iPhone?

Yes
No, but soon
No


View Results

Poll Finishes In 7 Days.
Discuss in The Lounge
Poll History




Data Recovery Software