Computing.Net > Forums > CPUs/Overclocking > GPU overclocking

Computer Problems? Computing.Net has over 1,000,000 posts about all things technology related! Over 90% answered within 24 hours! Click here to start participating now! Also, be sure to check out the New User Guide.

GPU overclocking

Reply to Message Icon

Name: Steging
Date: June 27, 2006 at 05:07:31 Pacific
OS: win xp pro
CPU/Ram: 3700+ 1Gb
Product: custom
Comment:

i have decided to wait a few more month before upgrading my graphics card.
so i was thinking of overclocking it.

now i did some research and started overclocking the core and memory.

from 398 to 450 core and 202 to 243 memory.
then i did some benchmarks.
pcmark05 (graphics only) but it showed me something odd:

CPU 2.2Ghz GPU 398/202 = 1193 marks
CPU 2.2Ghz GPU 450/243 = 1331 marks
CPU 2.8Ghz GPU 398/202 = 1216 marks
CPU 2.8Ghz GPU 450/243 = 1316 marks

as u can see i get more marks when my gpu is overclocked and cpu running at stock speeds.. hmm that weird i think. or is it?

any advise or well anything will be apreciated thanks

ATi Radeon 9600 PRO
AMD Athlon 64 3700+
Gigabyte K8NSC-939
1Gb Team Group DDR400
Maxtor 200Gb
450 Watts PSU
4 vents



Sponsored Link
Ads by Google

Response Number 1
Name: jam
Date: June 27, 2006 at 05:56:32 Pacific
Reply:

Are you sure you have a 9600PRO? It's reference specs are GPU @ 400MHz, memory @ 300MHz (DDR600). True ATI cards will adhere to the specs, but cards made by 3rd party manufacturers using ATI chipsets can vary. If your stock memory speed is 200MHz (DDR400), I'd be willing to bet you don't have a *true* ATI card.

http://www.hardwaresecrets.com/article/131

Regardless, I think you're wasting your time. No matter how much you overclock, the gains will be minimal & you're only gonna stress the card. Like I've told you before, you have a solid system with the exception of video...your 3700+ will never live up to it's gaming potential with such a weak card, overclocked ot not.

What program are you using to overclock? You should be using ATiTool...it will take all the guess work out of it for you. It has a small window with a spinning cube that measures FPS as it increases the GPU or memory, or both. PCMark will show you numbers, but what do they really mean? Sure higher is better, but was does it translate to when it comes to FPS in games? And one of the benefits of ATiTool is that you can setup different profiles...with a couple of clicks you can load your O/C settings & play a game. You don't need your card overclocked if all you're doing is cruising the internet, so a couple of clicks will bring it back to default settings again.

http://www.techpowerup.com/atitool/

Ideally, you should upgrade your card. There are plenty of decent AGP cards out there that will blow away your 9600PRO & you wouldn't have to spend a lot. IMO, the X1600PRO is the best "bang for your buck" in AGP right now.


0

Response Number 2
Name: Steging
Date: June 27, 2006 at 06:13:53 Pacific
Reply:

hmm ok thanks ill set everything to default.
and yeah it does seem weird that memory clock at 200 but thats what everything says it is.

256MB should do the trick right? even when im willing to play 1600 x 1200. ofcourse 512 will do better but..

for COD2 which i mainly play 10xx X 7xx is the best resolution to play. you wont lose data or speed. 1600 x 1200 is better looking but not nessesary because the engine runs at 10xx X 7xx aswell. so there is no converting involved.

thanks :D

ATi Radeon 9600 PRO
AMD Athlon 64 3700+
Gigabyte K8NSC-939
1Gb Team Group DDR400
Maxtor 200Gb
450 Watts PSU
4 vents


0

Response Number 3
Name: Steging
Date: June 27, 2006 at 06:15:07 Pacific
Reply:

ooh and i used Radlinker/Radclocker

ATi Radeon 9600 PRO
AMD Athlon 64 3700+
Gigabyte K8NSC-939
1Gb Team Group DDR400
Maxtor 200Gb
450 Watts PSU
4 vents


0

Response Number 4
Name: jam
Date: June 27, 2006 at 06:51:34 Pacific
Reply:

"i used Radlinker/Radclocker"

Use ATiTool! The link is provided above....download it & try it!

"256MB should do the trick right? even when im willing to play 1600 x 1200. ofcourse 512 will do better but.."

It depends on the card. 512MB is useless on all but highend cards, but card manufacturers know that most people think more is better, so they take a lower end card, slap on some cheap 512MB memory, then jack up the price. 256MB is plenty for a mid range card & depending on the card, 128MB may even be enough.



0

Response Number 5
Name: Steging
Date: June 27, 2006 at 08:49:45 Pacific
Reply:

okay thanks X1600PRO 256MB it will be then.
any advise for the manufacturer to go with?

like Club3D or Sapphire?

also i see most X1600PRO's come with DDR-II does that make a big difference??

thanks

ATi Radeon 9600 PRO
AMD Athlon 64 3700+
Gigabyte K8NSC-939
1Gb Team Group DDR400
Maxtor 200Gb
450 Watts PSU
4 vents


0

Related Posts

See More



Response Number 6
Name: jam
Date: June 27, 2006 at 10:03:01 Pacific
Reply:

Sapphire! They're probably the top manufacturer of ATI based cards (other than ATI). I forgot where you're from but I don't think it's the USA? But if you are, you have two more days to cash in on this deal before the rebate expires:

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16814102666


0

Response Number 7
Name: Steging
Date: June 27, 2006 at 10:16:19 Pacific
Reply:

nah im from holland and yes sapphire is the one im going for:P

the only 2 concerns for me are the DDR-II and the 128-bit memory interface could u tell me something about them

ATi Radeon 9600 PRO
AMD Athlon 64 3700+
Gigabyte K8NSC-939
1Gb Team Group DDR400
Maxtor 200Gb
450 Watts PSU
4 vents


0

Response Number 8
Name: jam
Date: June 27, 2006 at 10:35:19 Pacific
Reply:

64-bit sucks for gaming, 128-bit is good, 256-bit is best, but you generally pay more for 256-bit cards.

GDDR2 is better than SDRAM or DDR, GDDR3 is currently the best, but once again, you generally have to pay more for GDDR3.

All the specs are listed here:

http://www.techpowerup.com/gpudb/

Look at these bench comparisons between the 9600Pro & X1600Pro:

http://www.tomshardware.com/2006/06/14/radeon_x1600_pro/page7.html#fear


0

Response Number 9
Name: Steging
Date: June 27, 2006 at 10:59:05 Pacific
Reply:

alright ill have to deal with it i guess although i can afford getting myself an X850XT its not worth it right now. the AGP and PCI-e version show similar results.

alright first im off for a vacation then im gonna see how much money if left.

im almost 16 so we're going out every day the whole week:D

thanks for the advise :D again:P

ATi Radeon 9600 PRO
AMD Athlon 64 3700+
Gigabyte K8NSC-939
1Gb Team Group DDR400
Maxtor 200Gb
450 Watts PSU
4 vents


0

Response Number 10
Name: jam
Date: June 28, 2006 at 17:56:40 Pacific
Reply:

If you compare cards of identical specs with the only difference being that one is AGP & the other PCI-e, of course they'll show similar results. PCI-e is not THAT much better in head-to-head competiton. The thing is, you can only go so far with AGP because almost all new cards are being made as PCI-e only. Like I've told you before...you have a solid system, except for your video card. Just get a 1/2 decent AGP card & ride it out as long as you can. There's no point shelling out for a new board just for the sake of PCI-e. Actually, it probably wouldn't make sense for you to get another S939 board now that AM2 is out. Save your money for the next BIG upgrade...AM2 board/CPU/PCI-e/DDR2 RAM.


0

Response Number 11
Name: Cobra_R
Date: June 28, 2006 at 20:53:38 Pacific
Reply:

better yet wait a litte over a year from now and get you a AM2 system with DDR3, PCI-e II. AMD's roadmap for the revision of the AM2 will launch somewhere on Q4 of 2007.

That's what i'm doing, i'm waiting for the quad-core AMD's with DDR3 support and PCI-e II. I'm eager too see how much time that system would cut out of encoding times with videos compared to my current one.

AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+ OC 2.7ghz
2GB Dual Channel DDR 3200
Nvidia 7800GT
SATA II 2x 200gig 7200rpm 16mb cache RAID-0
Gigabyte Nforce 4 SLI



0

Response Number 12
Name: Steging
Date: June 29, 2006 at 06:53:07 Pacific
Reply:

yes but i think quad core's will be expensive so i think ill wait for 2 or more years like jam said ride it out.

i can hold out with a underclocked 9600 PRO (its not a true one) ooh btw its from geXcube

so an x1600 pro will keep me off from buying for probably more than 2 years i hope:P

ATi Radeon 9600 PRO
AMD Athlon 64 3700+
Gigabyte K8NSC-939
1Gb Team Group DDR400
Maxtor 200Gb
450 Watts PSU
4 vents


0

Sponsored Link
Ads by Google
Reply to Message Icon






Post Locked

This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.


Go to CPUs/Overclocking Forum Home


Sponsored links

Ads by Google


Results for: GPU overclocking

GPU Overclocking www.computing.net/answers/cpus/gpu-overclocking-/14790.html

GPU overclock question. www.computing.net/answers/cpus/gpu-overclock-question/12908.html

GPU Overclocking www.computing.net/answers/cpus/gpu-overclocking/14728.html