Computing.Net > Forums > CPUs/Overclocking > Enough core power for 2900xt Xfire?

Computer Problems? Computing.Net has over 1,000,000 posts about all things technology related! Over 90% answered within 24 hours! Click here to start participating now! Also, be sure to check out the New User Guide.

Enough core power for 2900xt Xfire?

Reply to Message Icon

Name: Mortagen
Date: September 29, 2008 at 17:37:59 Pacific
OS: Windows
CPU/Ram: Refer to Post
Product: Refer to Post
Comment:

Hi guys,

I've been reading a lot on CPUs lately... trying to learn and understand new things and i have a couple of questions regarding ATI Radeon 2900xt Crossfire. Can a Core 2 Duo e6550 run these two cards at their potential or will they be bottlenecked by the CPU? Also... how does its little brother the Core Duo T2700 fare in this situation? Half the FSB speed and cache means it can't run these two at their potential? or is it all just about raw clock speed and power?

Thanks guys :)

Hi :)



Sponsored Link
Ads by Google

Response Number 1
Name: jam
Date: September 29, 2008 at 17:59:49 Pacific
Reply:

save your money

"If my answers frighten you then you should cease asking scary questions" - Jules Winnfield (Samuel L. Jackson) in Pulp Fiction


0

Response Number 2
Name: Mortagen
Date: September 29, 2008 at 18:02:44 Pacific
Reply:

um...?

Hi :)


0

Response Number 3
Name: jackbomb
Date: September 29, 2008 at 18:42:08 Pacific
Reply:

2900XT? Not the best card.

Unless it's under $80, you'd be better off aiming for at least an HD3870. The 4850 is also quite inexpensive and much faster than the 3870.

The 2900XT was hot and slow--a Prescott of the videocard world. It was also the only Radeon HD card that did not feature hardware video decoding (even the lowly HD 2400 featured UVD).

Core Duo? That won't even fit an LGA775 socket. The Core Duo is a 32-bit, mobile-only CPU. It is in no way the e6550's little brother. That title belongs to the Pentium Dual Core.

An e6550 won't bottleneck two HD 3870-level cards, but it may hold a pair of HD 4850s back.

The Quad-Pumped Super P3:
Pentium M Dothan @ 2.82GHz (166x17)
3GB PC6400 @ 667MHz
9600GT
Blu-Ray
Modified PowerMac G4 Quicksilver case
Homebuilt 1080p projector
Vista SP1


0

Response Number 4
Name: Mortagen
Date: September 29, 2008 at 19:13:27 Pacific
Reply:

I chose 2900xt cards for my scenario based on PCI-Express v1.X cards... even though v2 cards are backwards compatible. I guess it was just random curiosity :)

Core Duos can be used with those specialty boards so they can be used on the desktop... and there is a crossfire core duo board available too :) I spoke of the t2700 being the e6550's little brother due to the same clock speed but having half the bus and cache... and being a core duo not a core 2 duo. Not exactly it's little brother so to speak... but you get what i mean. Oh and some of those early Pentium Dual Cores are Yonah based =P

So neither CPUs would hold back those old hot 2900xt cards in crossfire?

Hi :)


0

Response Number 5
Name: jackbomb
Date: September 29, 2008 at 23:26:36 Pacific
Reply:

Oh, you're talking about one of those Socket M boards? I just thought you were working with an LGA775 board since you mentioned the e6550.

"Oh and some of those early Pentium Dual Cores are Yonah based =P"

All of the desktop P-Dual Cores are Core 2-based. You're right, though; some mobile P-DCs are Yonah-based.

"So neither CPUs would hold back those old hot 2900xt cards in crossfire?"

The e6550 is a great deal faster than the T2700, being Core 2-based and all. However, based on the fact that the older Core Duo is about as efficient as the Athlon X2 per clock, I'm gonna say that the T2700 won't hold back a pair of 2900XTs. And if it did, it wouldn't be a very big bottleneck.

Still, 2900XTs? Kinda defeats the purpose of having an energy efficient, cool-running mobile-on-desktop rig, if you ask me.

The Quad-Pumped Super P3:
Pentium M Dothan @ 2.82GHz (166x17)
3GB PC6400 @ 667MHz
9600GT
Blu-Ray
Modified PowerMac G4 Quicksilver case
Homebuilt 1080p projector
Vista SP1


0

Related Posts

See More



Response Number 6
Name: Mortagen
Date: September 30, 2008 at 06:11:29 Pacific
Reply:

Hahaha definitely defeats the purpose... unless someone is just a die hard P6 lover... even though Core 2 is an ascendant of P6 since core arch is based on P6.

Thanks for the info jack! =)

Hi :)


0

Sponsored Link
Ads by Google
Reply to Message Icon






Post Locked

This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.


Go to CPUs/Overclocking Forum Home


Sponsored links

Ads by Google


Results for: Enough core power for 2900xt Xfire?

can i get more horse power for free www.computing.net/answers/cpus/can-i-get-more-horse-power-for-free/4376.html

Intel Core 2 Duo E6300 Fan Issue? www.computing.net/answers/cpus/intel-core-2-duo-e6300-fan-issue/14080.html

Is my power Supply big enough? www.computing.net/answers/cpus/is-my-power-supply-big-enough/5571.html