| Computing.Net: Over 1,000,000 posts about all things technology related! Over 90% answered within 24 hours! Click here to sign up now, it's free! |
Dual Processor vs. 64-bit
|
Original Message
|
Name: Pyro Penguin
Date: April 25, 2005 at 09:01:26 Pacific
Subject: Dual Processor vs. 64-bitOS: windows xp proCPU/Ram: 2500+\512mb 3200 |
Comment: Last year I built a computer (my first one from scratch) and I see a TON of error i made and so I want to create a more powerful PC. I have 2 ideas and i was wondering if anyone could speculate which would run faster. Dual Processor 2x SP Athlon 3000+ (will be overclocked equaly) -or- Athlon 64 Athlon 64 3500+ /2000mh FSB I would add BFG GeForce 6800 GT / 256MB GDDR3 / PCI Express / Dual DVI / TV Out / Video Card and have 2x1024 DDR2 also i have not decided opn mobos, i found one i liked for the dual processor system but i lost the url -_- if you have ne subjestions that would be ace. TY ^^ BFG GeForce 6800 GT / 256MB GDDR3 / PCI Express / Dual DVI / TV Out / Video Card -- My Computer -- Athlon 2500+ O/C'd to 2.2 ghz 512 dual channel ram 9200se 128 mb Vid Card Soyo KT600 MoBo 600w P/S Chieftec Matrix Black Case :P
Report Offensive Message For Removal
|
|
Response Number 1
|
Name: jam
Date: April 25, 2005 at 19:19:46 Pacific
|
Reply: (edit)What are you gonna use this thing for? Last I heard, there's no advantage to running dual CPUs except under very specific circumstances, such as a server. And 1GB RAM running in dual channel mode is plenty. Once again, there's not much advantage to running 2GB except under certain circumstances, such a CAD machine The system you have listed in your sig is being dragged down by that lame 9200SE. Asus A7N8X-X 1800+ @ 8 x 210MHz 768MB PC3200 Asus A9550 128MB/128-bit Gamer Edition WinME/WinXP Pro
Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal
|
|
Response Number 2
|
Name: cyberlantz
Date: April 25, 2005 at 19:22:34 Pacific
|
Reply: (edit)Your current set up is fine except for the video card. If your going to upgrade, go with A64. ASUS A8N-SLI A64 3000+ 1gig Corsair XMS LEADTEK PX6600GT TDH Enermax 535W Dual 80gig WD.
Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal
|
|
Response Number 3
|
|
Reply: (edit):P In july im getting a 19" lcd panel and a new vid car + 1 gig of ram so ill be doin better. This computer will be used for a) creating counterstrike maps (almost cad) b) CAD drawings c) server to host my pretty maps :P so basically I need that extra power. But i suppose i will go for the athlon 64. ty for all the help :P -- My Computer -- Athlon 2500+ O/C'd to 2.2 ghz 512 dual channel ram 9200se 128 mb Vid Card Soyo KT600 MoBo 600w P/S Chieftec Matrix Black Case :P
Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal
|
|
Response Number 4
|
Name: Cobra_R
Date: May 1, 2005 at 04:58:47 Pacific
|
Reply: (edit)Well the AMD 64 Athlon 4000+ is the end of for a Athlon 64 single core processor. The Athlon X2 dual core processor will replace it but at a price. The slowest Athlon 64 X2 4200+ processor will run 537 dollars. The fastest Pentium D is still cheaper than the slowest Athlon 64 X2 4200+, and the slowest Pentium D is ridiculously cheap compared to AMD's dual core offerings.
Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal
|

Post Locked
This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.
Go to CPUs/Overclocking Forum Home