Computing.Net > Forums > CPUs/Overclocking > Did anyone notice this?

Computer Problems? Computing.Net has over 1,000,000 posts about all things technology related! Over 90% answered within 24 hours! Click here to start participating now! Also, be sure to check out the New User Guide.

Did anyone notice this?

Reply to Message Icon

Name: Dual D Flip Flop
Date: December 27, 2001 at 11:49:58 Pacific
Comment:

In the 80's and early 90's all the x86 processor equipt computers started using math co-processors and when the Pentium's were introduced they simply disappeared, why? Now Itanium is almost here and we see co-processors introduced again. Why don't we stop looking at higher frequencies and start paying attention to lower level processing functions, so the CPU is not overwhelmed with all of the processing it never had to do after the 486?



Sponsored Link
Ads by Google

Response Number 1
Name: hoons
Date: December 27, 2001 at 14:05:19 Pacific
Reply:

The math co-processor was integrated into the 486 DX and above CPU chip. As for why they are separate with the Itanium, I wasn't aware of that fact.


0

Response Number 2
Name: Somebody
Date: December 28, 2001 at 07:39:42 Pacific
Reply:

This kind of sound like display adapters and 3D accelerators. At first they were 2 seperate things, but now they combined and faster. But the fact is that there are muany more instructions and a lot more transistors. And Pentium and AMD processors do have the 3DNow! and SSE instructions and transistors on the chip, which is kindof like a co-processor for 3D stuff.


0

Response Number 3
Name: joe
Date: January 3, 2002 at 14:39:17 Pacific
Reply:

yea 486DX and above always have a math chip built in, As for the Itanium thing I wasn't aware of an external co-proccesor but it makes sence as you can only sqeeze so many transistors onto a waffer. look at the PIII slot chip with the level 2 cache on two extra chips, later they stuck it back on a single die. bet a few years from now the Itanium IIXP/4Ghz will have it integrated again.


0

Sponsored Link
Ads by Google
Reply to Message Icon

Related Posts

See More







Post Locked

This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.


Go to CPUs/Overclocking Forum Home


Sponsored links

Ads by Google


Results for: Did anyone notice this?

Unlock Barton www.computing.net/answers/cpus/unlock-barton/9015.html

overclocking CPU via System Bus www.computing.net/answers/cpus/overclocking-cpu-via-system-bus/9676.html

AMD & Heatsink Help www.computing.net/answers/cpus/amd-amp-heatsink-help/11610.html