Computing.Net > Forums > CPUs/Overclocking > cores vs clock speed

Computer Problems? Computing.Net has over 1,000,000 posts about all things technology related! Over 90% answered within 24 hours! Click here to start participating now! Also, be sure to check out the New User Guide.

cores vs clock speed

Reply to Message Icon

Name: chrisbuchli
Date: October 4, 2009 at 21:04:21 Pacific
OS: Microsoft Windows XP Professional
CPU/Ram: 1.832 GHz / 1535 MB
Product: Gigabyte / Awrdacpi
Subcategory: General
Comment:

Greetings all,

I'm building a new computer and I'm just wondering whether it is better to have a slightly higher clock speed on a dual core CPU, or a slightly lower one on a quad core CPU?

Does it all come down to clock speed, or is there some direct benefit to having more cores?

I'm not interested in overclocking or anything like that. Just want something to get it done.

Cheers,

Chris.



Sponsored Link
Ads by Google

Response Number 1
Name: Cobra_R
Date: October 4, 2009 at 21:52:38 Pacific
Reply:

It all depends upon what you are going to do with your pc, but a slight performance gain isn't going to be a noticeable diff over a Quad Core on the same core logic that's a slightly lower speed when doing typical multi-tasking. The big payoff in the future is not going to be the speed, but the amount of cores instead and that's what Quad Cores have over Dual cores and with Quad Cores becoming soo cheap now, they are becoming the more appealing choice with new builds.

Iron Sharpens Iron.


0
Reply to Message Icon

Related Posts

See More






Use following form to reply to current message:

Login or Register to Reply
LoginRegister


Sponsored links

Ads by Google


Results for: cores vs clock speed

CPU vs clock speed www.computing.net/answers/cpus/cpu-vs-clock-speed/14272.html

Bus clock speed for Athlon 2000+? www.computing.net/answers/cpus/bus-clock-speed-for-athlon-2000/3302.html

Need help with setting clock speed www.computing.net/answers/cpus/need-help-with-setting-clock-speed/4791.html