Computing.Net > Forums > CPUs/Overclocking > Core 2 Duo vs. Core 2 Quad

Computer Problems? Computing.Net has over 1,000,000 posts about all things technology related! Over 90% answered within 24 hours! Click here to start participating now! Also, be sure to check out the New User Guide.

Core 2 Duo vs. Core 2 Quad

Reply to Message Icon

Name: CyberDude
Date: August 21, 2008 at 21:38:19 Pacific
OS: Windows Vista
CPU/Ram: 3Ghz/4GB
Comment:

I am building a new computer. I was focused on getting the Core 2 Duo E8400 when I saw a Tiger Direct video on the Core 2 Quad Q6600. In the video, they compare the Q6600 to a thousand dollar processor and the Q6600 was right up there with it. My question is "Do I need a Core Quad?" I don't do gaming or multi-threaded apps, at the most maybe some multimedia stuff. I've noticed the Q6600 is 65nm where the E8400 is 45nm. Also, the E8400 is rated at 67 watts vs. the Q6600 at 92 watts, which means more power consumption and running warmer, right? And the FSB is 1333 on the 8400 but only 1066 on the Q6600. Because of these reasons, I'm leaning towards the E8400. Which processor should I purchase? Which one will last a couple years and able to adapt to new technologies? Thanks to those who respond.



Sponsored Link
Ads by Google

Response Number 1
Name: Cobra_R
Date: August 21, 2008 at 22:06:38 Pacific
Reply:

The E8400 is a good buy and it outperforms the Q6600 in mutiple threaded apps. But the type of person that you are you could even go lower and save yourself a lot more money. To tell you the truth i find buying an E8400 let alone a Q6600 is pointless for you if you are never going to use them to their fulliest. It would be like buying a really fast sports car and never really going past 55mph, but you bought it because it "could" go really fast.


0

Response Number 2
Name: jam
Date: August 21, 2008 at 22:45:36 Pacific
Reply:

Get an E7200 & overclock. You don't necessarily have to crank the heck out of the CPU. You can play it safe & just reconfigure the clock settings to overclock the FSB, but keep the overall clock speed close to the default. Instead of running it at 2.53GHz (9.5 x 266), you could set it to something like 2.5GHz (7.5 x 333MHz), 2.67GHz (8 x 333), 2.6GHz (6.5 x 400).


0

Response Number 3
Name: martin16v
Date: August 24, 2008 at 03:32:49 Pacific
Reply:

"Get an E7200 & overclock."
im looking at building new new system to replace my ageing barton and nf7 mobo and this looks like a pretty good chip.
could you sujest a mobo and ram to bolt up to this.

vista ultimate/sp1
120gb hdd
plextor dvd-r
pioneer dvd r
Abit NF7-S V2.0 Mobo,
xp2500 mobile @ 200x11/1.575v,
2X512 crucial Pc3200,
MSI X800 Pro-TD256 AGP 256M
PA9C-42CU cooper


0

Response Number 4
Name: Jaw-Dun Thai Wraa
Date: August 25, 2008 at 09:57:58 Pacific
Reply:

I have a Q6600, does that mean I don't have a good processor and should consider getting the E8400 CPU?


0

Response Number 5
Name: Cobra_R
Date: August 29, 2008 at 16:18:46 Pacific
Reply:

No you're fine. The Q6600 is better overall then the E8400 dual core, because of it's quad core capabilites.

If it's broke, then blow that sucka up!


0

Related Posts

See More



Sponsored Link
Ads by Google
Reply to Message Icon






Post Locked

This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.


Go to CPUs/Overclocking Forum Home


Sponsored links

Ads by Google


Results for: Core 2 Duo vs. Core 2 Quad

Intel Core 2 Duo vs Centrino 2 Duo www.computing.net/answers/cpus/intel-core-2-duo-vs-centrino-2-duo/14805.html

AMD Turion vs. Intel Core 2 Duo www.computing.net/answers/cpus/amd-turion-vs-intel-core-2-duo/15287.html

Core 2 Duo or Core 2 Quad? www.computing.net/answers/cpus/core-2-duo-or-core-2-quad/14719.html