Computing.Net > Forums > CPUs/Overclocking > celeron d 340 Vs athlon xp 2800+

celeron d 340 Vs athlon xp 2800+

Reply to Message Icon

Original Message
Name: Chuck Forest
Date: April 23, 2006 at 22:38:49 Pacific
Subject: celeron d 340 Vs athlon xp 2800+
OS: xp media center
CPU/Ram: celeron d 340
Comment:

Hi everybody, right now I have a Celeron D 340 and i dont really like it its sluggish in games and multasking. I was looking at newegg.com and saw a combo mobo and cpu
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16813135005. So should i buy the athlon xp 2800+ combo or stick with my clereon D 340.


Report Offensive Message For Removal


Response Number 1
Name: Cobra_R
Date: April 24, 2006 at 01:11:12 Pacific
Subject: celeron d 340 Vs athlon xp 2800+
Reply: (edit)

Go with a socket 939 nforce 4 and throw in an Athlon 64 3000+ and oc it.

AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+
2GB Dual Channel DDR 3200
Nvidia 7800GT
SATA II 2x 200gig 7200rpm 16mb cache RAID-0
Gigabyte Nforce 4 SLI



Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 2
Name: Sabertooth
Date: April 24, 2006 at 09:59:42 Pacific
Subject: celeron d 340 Vs athlon xp 2800+
Reply: (edit)

Can't you just upgrade the CPU instead of a dead-end MOBO/CPU combo ?

If you must go your route, there is another option below (it was $100.00 two weeks ago).

http://shop3.outpost.com/product/4705559?site=sr:SEARCH:MAIN_RSLT_PG


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 3
Name: jam
Date: April 24, 2006 at 11:07:43 Pacific
Subject: celeron d 340 Vs athlon xp 2800+
Reply: (edit)

You can't beat the combo deal posted by Sabertooth. And if you check the following site, you'll find all sorts of tips & tricks to overclocking it. Pay particular attention to posts by furballi & Zap:

http://forums.anandtech.com/messageview.aspx?catid=40&threadid=1796551&enterthread=y



Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 4
Name: Chuck Forest
Date: April 24, 2006 at 19:08:18 Pacific
Subject: celeron d 340 Vs athlon xp 2800+
Reply: (edit)

well the mobo that i have now with my celeron is a piece of crap, it only has 3pci slots no agp or pci e


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 5
Name: Chuck Forest
Date: April 24, 2006 at 19:15:15 Pacific
Subject: celeron d 340 Vs athlon xp 2800+
Reply: (edit)

that comob that Sabertooth's link is ATX i need a micro ATX and the althlon xp is better than the sempron


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal


Response Number 6
Name: Mattwizz3 (by mattwizz3)
Date: April 25, 2006 at 04:33:28 Pacific
Subject: celeron d 340 Vs athlon xp 2800+
Reply: (edit)

An Athlon XP is old technology now and spent its last years on Socket A.. If you got a socket 754 Sempron 2800+ anginst a 2800+ Athlon XP on socket A it would out perform the Athlon XP, So a 3100+ would slaughter it. Also, 754 still has a bit of a future and processors are still being made for it. Socket A was phased out in 2005 and it lived longer than expected.

If I were you I would also get a standard ATX case as you can get them cheap as dirt if get a plain one.. But that brings in the matter of the power supply... but maby someone else can contiue this as I have had enough typing for now.

Mattwizz3 : )


... meh


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 7
Name: jam
Date: April 25, 2006 at 04:56:02 Pacific
Subject: celeron d 340 Vs athlon xp 2800+
Reply: (edit)

"the althlon xp is better than the sempron"

That's incorrect. Sabertooth's link is to a S754 Sempron which is based on the Athlon64, so it's better than any socket A AthlonXP/Sempron.

But even if we were talking about a socket A Sempron, it's nothing more than an Athlon XP (TBred) with a new name, new FSB, & new PR rating system. In fact, the Sempron is actually better than the AXP it replaced because ALL Semprons run at 333FSB, while the majority of the AXP TBreds run at 266FSB. You can even find a couple of Semprons based on the Barton core.

http://www.tomshardware.com/2005/11/21/the_mother_of_all_cpu_charts_2005/page29.html


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 8
Name: Chuck Forest
Date: April 25, 2006 at 17:59:28 Pacific
Subject: celeron d 340 Vs athlon xp 2800+
Reply: (edit)

Yea but althon xp thats in the like that i posted is s754 and its 800/1600 mhz fsb. Plus the AXP is a 512 L2 cache and the sempron is only 256 L2 cache like my celeron. And the AXP is a barton core


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 9
Name: Sabertooth
Date: April 25, 2006 at 20:02:12 Pacific
Subject: celeron d 340 Vs athlon xp 2800+
Reply: (edit)

Err........before you get all pumped up about the Socket 754 Athlon XP-M 2800+ in the Newegg deal, you might want to cross check your information.

AFAIK the L2 cache on the 754 (1600 MHz) CPU is actually a measly 128KB and NOT 512KB as you claimed. Even its sibling, the Socket 754 Athlon XP-M 3000+ (also a Dublin) only comes with 256KB L2 cache.

I honestly suggest you listen to what the guys above are telling you, rather than acting like you know more than you apparently do !!!


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal






Use following form to reply to current message:

   Name: From My Computing.Net Settings
 E-Mail: From My Computing.Net Settings

Subject: celeron d 340 Vs athlon xp 2800+

Comments:

 


  Homepage URL (*): 
Homepage Title (*): 
         Image URL: 
 
Data Recovery Software




How often do you use Computing.Net?

Every Day
Once a Week
Once a Month
This Is My First Time!


View Results

Poll Finishes In 2 Days.
Discuss in The Lounge