Computing.Net > Forums > CPUs/Overclocking > Can't beat p4 3.2

Computer Problems? Computing.Net has over 1,000,000 posts about all things technology related! Over 90% answered within 24 hours! Click here to start participating now! Also, be sure to check out the New User Guide.

Can't beat p4 3.2

Reply to Message Icon

Name: Rob
Date: December 12, 2003 at 22:36:22 Pacific
OS: xp pro
CPU/Ram: AMD 1.6 gig, 512
Comment:

I just picked up a 2500+ 512L2 and have the fsb up too 440. I benchmarked on Sandra and beat the 3200+ hands down but the p4 beat me in almost all the tests. My vcore is still set at 1.65 and its running at 46-52c I have pc2100 thats running at 360 4 2 2 2...... nehope to beat the p4 3.2 gig my only thought is to get some dual c ddr400 and raise the vcore and fsb



Sponsored Link
Ads by Google

Response Number 1
Name: GerryC
Date: December 12, 2003 at 22:37:41 Pacific
Reply:

I can!!


0

Response Number 2
Name: Rob
Date: December 12, 2003 at 22:39:41 Pacific
Reply:

u can with what??????


0

Response Number 3
Name: ~Shawn~
Date: December 12, 2003 at 23:25:25 Pacific
Reply:

P4 benifits from Dual Channel DDR memory bandwidth and HT. AMD chips only have half of the memory bandwidth, so it's not surprising to see AMD is lagging behind a little. But for performance/price ratio, AMD chips are still the best choices.


0

Response Number 4
Name: real_cool
Date: December 13, 2003 at 12:17:28 Pacific
Reply:

The AMD64 can match the P4 HT 800 memory bandwidth. A P4 2.4C / 2.6C at $170 would have a better performance/price ratio.

We do have the choice for those who have, and those who have not.


0

Response Number 5
Name: ~Shawn~
Date: December 13, 2003 at 14:44:11 Pacific
Reply:

Here are some chips AMD is planning to make:

ClawHammer 940-pin – 1MB L2 cache, dual-channel memory controller, made at 0.13 micron SOI nodes.

ClawHammer 939-pin – 1MB L2 cache, dual-channel memory controller, Cool’n’Quiet technology, made at 0.13 micron SOI nodes.

Newcastle 939-pin – 512KB L2 cache, dual-channel memory controller, Cool’n’Quiet technology, made at 0.13 micron SOI nodes.

Winchester 939-pin – 512KB L2 cache, dual-channel memory controller, Cool’n’Quiet technology, made at 90nm SOI nodes.

San Diego 939-pin – 1MB L2 cache, dual-channel memory controller, Cool’n’Quiet technology, made at 90nm SOI nodes.

Note they all have dual channel memory controller, looks like AMD is catching up, starting with those current 64bit chips.


0

Related Posts

See More



Sponsored Link
Ads by Google
Reply to Message Icon






Post Locked

This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.


Go to CPUs/Overclocking Forum Home


Sponsored links

Ads by Google


Results for: Can't beat p4 3.2

P4 3.2 800FSB overclocking options www.computing.net/answers/cpus/p4-32-800fsb-overclocking-options/8631.html

Anyone OC'd a P4 3.2? www.computing.net/answers/cpus/anyone-ocd-a-p4-32/7882.html

AMD 2800+ vs Intel P4 3.2 w/ HTT www.computing.net/answers/cpus/amd-2800-vs-intel-p4-32-w-htt/13559.html